See, and others may find him consistent too. Consistently bad.Quote from Daanland
richard knaack is a great writer, he has a style, and is consistant with it.
Astonishing!Quote from Daanlandive been reading fantasy and sci-fi books for over 20 years, and have an immense collection of books.
So just how many fantasy and sci-fi books and how many years of having read them is required for our opinions to be informed?Quote from Daanlandi can say with some degree of informed opinion that he is a talented writer with a defined style.
I'm certainly not calling him a sellout. Who's saying that?Quote from Daanlandmany writers sell out v easily, and it becomes apparent very quickly that their material lacks substance anymore. richard is far from that.
But let me guess...your opinion will be much, much more, right?Quote from Daanlandthe OP and his friend are welcome to their opinion, but thats all it will ever be.
So in other words we don't have a right to criticize unless we can come up with something better, is that it? I thought all you needed to have an opinion about this topic was an immense collection of books as well as decades of reading experience. Are you saying you're a published author. Astonishing, again!Quote from Daanlandwhen you start writing your own material, lets see how that turns out. feel free of course in your own time to rewrite the books as you see fit, and post them up for the general publics opinion.
Fair enough. Except my complaint was not even about the plot, it was about the lack of character development which I personally, personally, find boring in novels. And it's not like Blizzard acting as editors are going to produce the best product. They're game developers not book publishers firsthand.Quote from Daanlandkeep in mind, that blizzard proof read every line and if they deem it to be incorrect, outlandish, "never going to happen!" or the like it would never have been published.
Humble, my ass.Quote from Daanlandblizzard agreed with every line, so feel free to change your bashing towards blizzard. your heated debate has little or no substance left to it, in my humble opinion of course:)
Gosh, thanks. You couldn't be anymore sarcastic right now, but thanks for real!Quote from Daanlandi bid you good day, and good gaming
1
Well, either way, a VERY belated welcome to the forum.
1
I still have no f**king clue what I just watched....
1
Other then that, best of luck to your signature-making future!!!
1
You will not pay monthly for this game.
Op question is answered. Multiple times. In multiple threads. Over multiple months.
Closing thread.
1
Whoever directed it, one day, I will kick in the nuts...
That's all I have to say about that...
1
1
1
Oh I don't doubt that Blizzard people are on this forum. I also don't doubt there are Blizzard people on forums for Warcraft, Assassins Creed, Halo, Zelda, and Metal Gear Solid. Now, being assigned is another story...
1
The Specter 0
The Peasant 1-9
The Squire 10-49
The Man at Arms 50-99
The Swordsman 100-199
The Knight 200-499
The Knight of the Realm 500-999
The Knight of the Order 1000-1499
The Paladin 1500-1999 * (Replaces The Cavalier)
The Lord 2000-2999 (Replaces The Paladin)
The Duke 3000-399
The Duke of Tristram 4000-4999
The Emmisary 5000-7499*
Tran'ouls Right Hand 7500+
Of course this is just a rough draft that I came up with off the top of my head. Give me a few hours and I am sure I can come up with some much better ranks. (Though I do like the "Tran'oul's Right Hand" one if I do say so myself...)
(Edited to add Atru's "The Specter" idea...)