I think they was talking about the Barbarian only with or with re-imagined warriors from Diablo’s past, like the
Ofc we will see a sorceress type character this is Diablo
Quote from "kiowa" »
Note they are talking warriors not just one:)
I think you have a point, but that the importance lies in the use of the word re-imagined: It seems to me that this implies a similar class to previous ones. They don't necessarily need to have the same name (barbarian), but be close to the older classes (ie: a very sorcerress-y type thing, but called, idunno, an elementalist.)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
And we can tie these caterpillars together to make bow strings for bows and arrows.
--Philip Fry
There was even talk of french toast, but there was none to be had
I have no doubt that Blizzard will make d3 interesting and fun and powerful! They already stated that there'll be no old classes (except barb) in d3, but also said there might be one or two classes in d3 expansion (so all of you waiting for palas, sorcs, amas (me) etc. keep your fingers crossed)! This doesn't mean that some skills or skill trees aren't going to be similar with current, but knowing Blizzard - they are going to make something similar, but in many ways better!
There's amazon island picture reveled which is going to appear in expansion so amazon is best guess so far IMO...
On-topic reply, I think one class is going to be reveled on BlizzCon (as I'm optimist I'll say maybe two ;)). As on which class that might be I don't know but if I would do it I would present most similar class to one in d2 (if there are similar classes which I believe will be the case) so other two more different and new classes raises our spirits just before they put out d3 on market.
I have no doubt that Blizzard will make d3 interesting and fun and powerful! They already stated that there'll be no old classes (except barb) in d3, but also said there might be one or two classes in d3 expansion (so all of you waiting for palas, sorcs, amas (me) etc. keep your fingers crossed)! This doesn't mean that some skills or skill trees aren't going to be similar with current, but knowing Blizzard - they are going to make something similar, but in many ways better!
There's amazon island picture reveled which is going to appear in expansion so amazon is best guess so far IMO...
On-topic reply, I think one class is going to be reveled on BlizzCon (as I'm optimist I'll say maybe two ;)). As on which class that might be I don't know but if I would do it I would present most similar class to one in d2 (if there are similar classes which I believe will be the case) so other two more different and new classes raises our spirits just before they put out d3 on market.
Thank you.
They already stated that there's going to be "warriors" FROM D2 in D3. That means that there are going to be at least another class from D2 usable in D3.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Arrogance, despised by some, considered genius by others.
i want an elemental melee class, that would kick such ass. I don't mean some screwy hybrid idea though (where the druid picks to fight with elemental magic, or turn into a melee character), I mean a class that only uses elemental magic to enhance his abilities.
like an enhancement shaman from WoW. If your not familiar, they imbue they're weapons with fire and ice and nature. They also have "shock" from frost flame and earth.
I'm pretty sure each character is going to be "re imagined", no "radically new" characters.
I.e.
Barbarian=barbarian
Necromancer=witch doctor (summon=summon, bone=fire, curse=disease)
Sorceress=witch (probly not elementalist as the sorceress had 3 element skill trees, so it would be too similar)
assassin=rogue
Amazon=archer/hunter
Druid=shapeshifter/shaman
Paladin=Cleric (not healing kind, but it is probly the class Blizzard was talking about when they said one class would make people mad)
Although I find these classes likely, I do not think they are a certainty (although if they do go with that many names from WoW I may have to cry). I'm pretty sure about the cleric and rogue though.
In response to the gunslinger thread closing, I find that we were on topic because the gunslinger question arose from Blizzard saying there would be a class that annoyed people, and we were speculating on what that class was.
I hope they annouce the new spellcaster. I really must know if they going to change the basic elemental nature of the soc or keep the same old thing.
A pally replace is not that urgent imo.
Well, realistically, since Diablo has become much more than just a single player game...I would think the paladin has to be in as that class is based in multiplayer, I hope that they nerf it so it's not the best ass kicker....damn hdins are boring to play. Necromancer, ya I suppose...seems the game engine wouldn't support it tho, so scrap the necro, sorcerer/ess is kinda a must...need some kinda magic powerhouse, I'd like to see the assassin make a comeback, w/o traps tho...an assassin should be all about speed, ass kicking while challenging gameplay of controlling a char that moves super fast.....hides...etc....I dunno. I think it would be fun, besides...imagine how awesome a geared sin would look....mwahahaha...pure awesomeness.
Druid? been replaced by witchdoctor.....now the Amazon....thats gotta be a tough one. They could probably roll that in with the barb class, make a fem barb and throw ranged wep skills in the skill set...who knows.
I'd like to see a reappearance of the monk, from the original Diablo expansion.....yes I've been playing that long. But I think there would be some serious kick-assedness going on to have a guy who just pummels you with fists or staff...yes....there is no end to the cool.
Rip off the seraphim from Sacred? an idea.....or even dark elf....hmmmm ideas abound.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I think you have a point, but that the importance lies in the use of the word re-imagined: It seems to me that this implies a similar class to previous ones. They don't necessarily need to have the same name (barbarian), but be close to the older classes (ie: a very sorcerress-y type thing, but called, idunno, an elementalist.)
-- Hank Venture
I have no doubt that Blizzard will make d3 interesting and fun and powerful! They already stated that there'll be no old classes (except barb) in d3, but also said there might be one or two classes in d3 expansion (so all of you waiting for palas, sorcs, amas (me) etc. keep your fingers crossed)! This doesn't mean that some skills or skill trees aren't going to be similar with current, but knowing Blizzard - they are going to make something similar, but in many ways better!
There's amazon island picture reveled which is going to appear in expansion so amazon is best guess so far IMO...
On-topic reply, I think one class is going to be reveled on BlizzCon (as I'm optimist I'll say maybe two ;)). As on which class that might be I don't know but if I would do it I would present most similar class to one in d2 (if there are similar classes which I believe will be the case) so other two more different and new classes raises our spirits just before they put out d3 on market.
Thank you.
They already stated that there's going to be "warriors" FROM D2 in D3. That means that there are going to be at least another class from D2 usable in D3.
Arrogance, despised by some, considered genius by others.
Yes, yes he did.
It's the decisions you make when you have no time to make them that define who you are.
-diablo2
Also D&D -starcraft
- warcraft3
-unreal tournament "all"
reach me at : [EMAIL="nezural1@hotmail.com"]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Yes, but to clarify upon that, they did say that they would probably bring back other D2 chars in expansions for D3.
like an enhancement shaman from WoW. If your not familiar, they imbue they're weapons with fire and ice and nature. They also have "shock" from frost flame and earth.
I.e.
Barbarian=barbarian
Necromancer=witch doctor (summon=summon, bone=fire, curse=disease)
Sorceress=witch (probly not elementalist as the sorceress had 3 element skill trees, so it would be too similar)
assassin=rogue
Amazon=archer/hunter
Druid=shapeshifter/shaman
Paladin=Cleric (not healing kind, but it is probly the class Blizzard was talking about when they said one class would make people mad)
Although I find these classes likely, I do not think they are a certainty (although if they do go with that many names from WoW I may have to cry). I'm pretty sure about the cleric and rogue though.
In response to the gunslinger thread closing, I find that we were on topic because the gunslinger question arose from Blizzard saying there would be a class that annoyed people, and we were speculating on what that class was.
A pally replace is not that urgent imo.
ROFL..
Blizzcon is on 10th-11th October.. there are still 8 days till blizzcon..
Theatre Major ie: waiter in training
Rise and rise again, until lambs become lions
kthxbye
Druid? been replaced by witchdoctor.....now the Amazon....thats gotta be a tough one. They could probably roll that in with the barb class, make a fem barb and throw ranged wep skills in the skill set...who knows.
I'd like to see a reappearance of the monk, from the original Diablo expansion.....yes I've been playing that long. But I think there would be some serious kick-assedness going on to have a guy who just pummels you with fists or staff...yes....there is no end to the cool.
Rip off the seraphim from Sacred? an idea.....or even dark elf....hmmmm ideas abound.