Hey, what if when d3 comes out an its complete garbage, after years of waiting an hopeing for its release then you get a pile of crap game? what would you then do?
would you kill yourself?
ehe, just kiddin fellors, of course nobodys going to off themselves over this game but wouldnt that better pretty histarical if there were mass suicides cuz d3 sucks. ahaa
if d3 sucks bad when release what other games can we hope for? im hopeing for chucky the game right now. but thats not a sure deal since im not sure there even going to release it.
what game would you play if d3 sucks? guild wars 2 maybe? kotor online?
The games im waiting to try are d3 of course, gw2 an maybe kotor online.
That would be terrible if it didn't live up to expectations. I think it will though. Every Blizzard game has entertained me for many many years, so I'm not worried at all. I'm not sure what game I'd go for then though if it did in fact suck that bad.
I'll play the other games I was looking at, Borderlands, Skyrim, SW:TOR, then there's a bunch of other games, I'll probably buy HoT, and really there's so much crap coming out this winter...
I think Diablo III will be OK. Most such games do not live up to expectations, and Diablo III may be "meh" but the name will save it. As long as they keep patching it it should be all right.
I'm certainly done with D1 and D2 and considering how crappy D2 was, Blizzard will have to majorly screw up to make DIII worse.
What's with all the D2 hate?! I thought it was really fun for its time...I'd never go back to it full time, but it's fun to rekindle some memories every once in a while =)
Battlefield 3 and Tribes: Ascend would definitely eat my life away in the off-chance that D3 isn't great.
As an aside, I actually worked on the original Tribes game. I was in high school, and my summer job was an internal game tester for Dynamix, INC, the developer. My mom was doing seriously sci-fi Computer Science research in a building shared with Dynamix, so I got literally the most fap job EVER for a high-schooler. I love Tribes more than I love myself. And that's saying something.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions."
-Thomas Jefferson
You don't put as much work as they have put into it and get shitty results. It's going to be an awesome game. Hell, even the demo was hella fun to play.
Its Blizzard. They made SC2 get good reviews, when it doesn't deserve half of it.
I think D3 has the chance to be a pretty good game. But their games just ain't special anymore. I just want D3 for the coop fun with my friends. Unlike lots of fanatics, I won't be putting 1000 hours on it in a few months. I'll just play it for a while and then move on.
I think it can live up to simple expectations. Its not even supposed to be anything extraordinary.
Its Blizzard. They made SC2 get good reviews, when it doesn't deserve half of it.
I think D3 has the chance to be a pretty good game. But their games just ain't special anymore. I just want D3 for the coop fun with my friends. Unlike lots of fanatics, I won't be putting 1000 hours on it in a few months. I'll just play it for a while and then move on.
I think it can live up to simple expectations. Its not even supposed to be anything extraordinary.
What is it you want for D3 to be special then? Is it just the fact that it's not revolutionizing like the first Diablo?
I mean if it wasn't ARPG/H&S it wouldn't even be Diablo so that wouldn't work. Give a suggestion instead of being cynical!
OT: Well that would be 2012 in a nut case(Rage of the Diablo fans).
If this game turns out bad I will never play another new released blizzard game again.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
www.myspace.com/mpotatoes for all your Trans Siberian Orchestra listening pleasure
If you want to arrange it
This world you can change it
If we could somehow make this
Christmas thing last
By helping a neighbor
Or even a stranger
And to know who needs help
You need only just ask
Its Blizzard. They made SC2 get good reviews, when it doesn't deserve half of it.
I think D3 has the chance to be a pretty good game. But their games just ain't special anymore. I just want D3 for the coop fun with my friends. Unlike lots of fanatics, I won't be putting 1000 hours on it in a few months. I'll just play it for a while and then move on.
I think it can live up to simple expectations. Its not even supposed to be anything extraordinary.
Well your entitled to your opinion, but I honestly think SC2 was one of the best games in the past year or so. Sure the campaign was lack-luster but you should expect that from and RTS. Ranked multiplayer is getting more balanced so there is competitive play and its really challenging when you get into the higher ranks. And of course the most underrated part of SC2 always gets overlooked the Custom Games, where you get so many different games you can play from TDs, DOTA, Arenas, they even got Shooter games, etc., etc.
Anyhow, if anyone has played the Blizzcon demos(like me) they would know the game was awesome so far and they are improving as they go on, at least thats my opinion and the majority of the Diablo community I think. I dont think it'll fail from my experience we'll see come beta. But if it does, which I highly doubt, I'll be playing Dark Souls, Skyrim, or something of the like.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"The righteous shall fall before the wicked, and all of Creation shall tremble before the burning standards of Hell."
Its Blizzard. They made SC2 get good reviews, when it doesn't deserve half of it.
I think D3 has the chance to be a pretty good game. But their games just ain't special anymore. I just want D3 for the coop fun with my friends. Unlike lots of fanatics, I won't be putting 1000 hours on it in a few months. I'll just play it for a while and then move on.
I think it can live up to simple expectations. Its not even supposed to be anything extraordinary.
Lol. Starcraft only spawned an esport and a following like no other RTS has ever dreamed, and sc2 follows that legacy. http://www.teamliquid.net/ To say SC2 didn't deserve the reviews it got doesn't make much sense.
It won't be bad. You can see from the videos it's not bad, if only because it's so true to the previous games. At absolute WORST it could be mediocre, but I seriously doubt it
You don't put as much work as they have put into it and get shitty results. It's going to be an awesome game. Hell, even the demo was hella fun to play.
duke nukem?
anyway, if the game fails, I wont have any faith in blizzard.
Agreed Duke was horrible. waited forever for nothing!
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Sometimes you don't always know where you stand... until you know that you won't run away.
What is it you want for D3 to be special then? Is it just the fact that it's not revolutionizing like the first Diablo?
I mean if it wasn't ARPG/H&S it wouldn't even be Diablo so that wouldn't work. Give a suggestion instead of being cynical!
I'll be cynical as much as I please and I don't have to elaborate because of it.
Lol. Starcraft only spawned an esport and a following like no other RTS has ever dreamed, and sc2 follows that legacy. http://www.teamliquid.net/ To say SC2 didn't deserve the reviews it got doesn't make much sense.
Heh, it still doesn't to me. It didn't push anything in fact, it probably made sure the genre doesn't move on and I even felt the genre was dumbed down on some level, not the opposite. Battle.net 2 was a travesty. The whole thing was made ridiculously casual just to grow their shiny esports. And without going too far into this because I already have in the past, Blizzard assumes too much control over the entire game. SC1 became what it is because of the community. SC2 is made and maintained as a money magnet, with textbook tried and true concepts and a very carefully laid out balance that prevents evolution of the genre. If you don't understand that, don't ask me to explain it.
SC2 is by no means bad, but to me it just feeds on ignorance, just like CoD did. Except Blizzard just knows how to treat their costumers in a way that it just doesn't go over the "line", so they're all still praising Blizzard. But I don't see them as a benefit to gaming at this point.
This whole point is hard for a lot of people to agree with, simply because "hey, the game is good, right?". I'd give it a 7/10 despite what I said, but it doesn't change anything. And I'm sick of people hungry for the exact same thing.
I waited for Spore for four years, became a moderator on the fansite, played the game once when it came out, got bored with it, and proceeded to wait for Diablo 3.. It kinda feels like deshavu up to this point lol.. I have my hopes admittedly high that Blizzard won't let me down as EA did though.
“We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be enthusiastic about.” - Albert Einstein
You don't put as much work as they have put into it and get shitty results. It's going to be an awesome game. Hell, even the demo was hella fun to play.
duke nukem?
anyway, if the game fails, I wont have any faith in blizzard.
Agreed Duke was horrible. waited forever for nothing!
I'm pretty sure 3DR didnt spended 100% of the time on duke nukem, blizzard on the other hand have a full group working ONLY on diablo 3.
Come on, look at how old duke nukem looked, engine, gameplan, gameplay, A.I and so on...
I don't know for sure if diablo III will rock but i do know that its not going to suck, worst case scenario it wont be as good as i'm hoping for. If that happen i'll be back to WoW, probably playing bf3 or w/e comes to mind, theres always something new to try (guild wars 2 looks promising).
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Sorry about my english, still learning.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
would you kill yourself?
ehe, just kiddin fellors, of course nobodys going to off themselves over this game but wouldnt that better pretty histarical if there were mass suicides cuz d3 sucks. ahaa
if d3 sucks bad when release what other games can we hope for? im hopeing for chucky the game right now. but thats not a sure deal since im not sure there even going to release it.
what game would you play if d3 sucks? guild wars 2 maybe? kotor online?
The games im waiting to try are d3 of course, gw2 an maybe kotor online.
1. It wont be a bad game.
2. Guild Wars? C'mon. If you dont play Diablo 3 you play Diablo 2 or 1.
:: Enkeria [Twitter / Twitch / Website / Tattoos]
the hell, speak for yourself, d1 is too old, and d2 is too lame, not to say guild wars doesn't suck
I will probably send much hate mail to jay, maybe find out where he lives and delivery personally.
but, I have a lot of faith that Diablo 3 is going to rock.
a better question is, what if diablo 3 consumes us all? o.o
then what will you do? 0-0
I think Diablo III will be OK. Most such games do not live up to expectations, and Diablo III may be "meh" but the name will save it. As long as they keep patching it it should be all right.
I'm certainly done with D1 and D2 and considering how crappy D2 was, Blizzard will have to majorly screw up to make DIII worse.
As an aside, I actually worked on the original Tribes game. I was in high school, and my summer job was an internal game tester for Dynamix, INC, the developer. My mom was doing seriously sci-fi Computer Science research in a building shared with Dynamix, so I got literally the most fap job EVER for a high-schooler. I love Tribes more than I love myself. And that's saying something.
-Thomas Jefferson
I think D3 has the chance to be a pretty good game. But their games just ain't special anymore. I just want D3 for the coop fun with my friends. Unlike lots of fanatics, I won't be putting 1000 hours on it in a few months. I'll just play it for a while and then move on.
I think it can live up to simple expectations. Its not even supposed to be anything extraordinary.
What is it you want for D3 to be special then? Is it just the fact that it's not revolutionizing like the first Diablo?
I mean if it wasn't ARPG/H&S it wouldn't even be Diablo so that wouldn't work. Give a suggestion instead of being cynical!
OT: Well that would be 2012 in a nut case(Rage of the Diablo fans).
If you want to arrange it
This world you can change it
If we could somehow make this
Christmas thing last
By helping a neighbor
Or even a stranger
And to know who needs help
You need only just ask
Well your entitled to your opinion, but I honestly think SC2 was one of the best games in the past year or so. Sure the campaign was lack-luster but you should expect that from and RTS. Ranked multiplayer is getting more balanced so there is competitive play and its really challenging when you get into the higher ranks. And of course the most underrated part of SC2 always gets overlooked the Custom Games, where you get so many different games you can play from TDs, DOTA, Arenas, they even got Shooter games, etc., etc.
Anyhow, if anyone has played the Blizzcon demos(like me) they would know the game was awesome so far and they are improving as they go on, at least thats my opinion and the majority of the Diablo community I think. I dont think it'll fail from my experience we'll see come beta. But if it does, which I highly doubt, I'll be playing Dark Souls, Skyrim, or something of the like.
I like Diablo, thats why Im waiting on Diablo 3.
D3 will rock.
And of course I speak for myself, everyone else does.
:: Enkeria [Twitter / Twitch / Website / Tattoos]
Lol. Starcraft only spawned an esport and a following like no other RTS has ever dreamed, and sc2 follows that legacy. http://www.teamliquid.net/ To say SC2 didn't deserve the reviews it got doesn't make much sense.
*knocks on wood*
I hate the way you cling to ignorance and pass it off as innocence
Agreed Duke was horrible. waited forever for nothing!
I'll be cynical as much as I please and I don't have to elaborate because of it.
Heh, it still doesn't to me. It didn't push anything in fact, it probably made sure the genre doesn't move on and I even felt the genre was dumbed down on some level, not the opposite. Battle.net 2 was a travesty. The whole thing was made ridiculously casual just to grow their shiny esports. And without going too far into this because I already have in the past, Blizzard assumes too much control over the entire game. SC1 became what it is because of the community. SC2 is made and maintained as a money magnet, with textbook tried and true concepts and a very carefully laid out balance that prevents evolution of the genre. If you don't understand that, don't ask me to explain it.
SC2 is by no means bad, but to me it just feeds on ignorance, just like CoD did. Except Blizzard just knows how to treat their costumers in a way that it just doesn't go over the "line", so they're all still praising Blizzard. But I don't see them as a benefit to gaming at this point.
This whole point is hard for a lot of people to agree with, simply because "hey, the game is good, right?". I'd give it a 7/10 despite what I said, but it doesn't change anything. And I'm sick of people hungry for the exact same thing.
I waited for Spore for four years, became a moderator on the fansite, played the game once when it came out, got bored with it, and proceeded to wait for Diablo 3.. It kinda feels like deshavu up to this point lol.. I have my hopes admittedly high that Blizzard won't let me down as EA did though.
I'm pretty sure 3DR didnt spended 100% of the time on duke nukem, blizzard on the other hand have a full group working ONLY on diablo 3.
Come on, look at how old duke nukem looked, engine, gameplan, gameplay, A.I and so on...
I don't know for sure if diablo III will rock but i do know that its not going to suck, worst case scenario it wont be as good as i'm hoping for. If that happen i'll be back to WoW, probably playing bf3 or w/e comes to mind, theres always something new to try (guild wars 2 looks promising).