Quote from "GrrrboyMC" »
Defo agree with what has been said above about that demonic looking fallen angel. I really hope it's Inarius. Would make some kind of sense if he returned after the worldstone's destruction considering his powers were linked to the stone in some way.
Quote from "GrrrboyMC" »Thats what I would expect too, but this is what I see. And this is why I am confused!
Quote from "GrrrboyMC" »I'll take your word for it, although I'm looking and can't see that anywhere, either on the wallpaper itself, in the filename or above the links to download the different sizes of wallpapers themselves. Maybe the site is regional. Maybe I just can't see it
Quote from sef239 »I've been lurking this site for years but now I have finally registered. Anyways, here's an interesting comment I decided to paste from the Diablo 3 forums on battle.net concerning the (most interesting) new picture of the angel.
"It's Imperius, the Archangel of War. He wanted to destroy Sanctuary at some point, but Tyrael used his final vote to save it from destruction at the council of heaven.
Imperius' sign is an upside down sword or something, that's why I think it's him. Also, it would make sense that since Tyrael really influenced the outcome in d2, maybe he was cast down, thus allowing Imperius to descend on Sanctuary (the meteor in the cinematic?) to put an end to the descendants of the Nephalem."
Quote from "GrrrboyMC" »Is there something I've missed here?
Quote from "Murderface" »How many of those will actually refuse to buy the game is the number you are looking for.
Quote from "battlelore" »
Anyway, looks like the petition had an effect, after all
Quote from "ryanmax24" »im gonna laugh though if the new art director isnt happy with D3s art direction lol now that would be a kick in the teeth.
Quote from "Luckmann" »First of all, even the Art Director is a subject to the whims of his superiors; He can only act in the extent the others allow him to - he'd have a say, but they'd be able to run him over, and any artist worth their salt wouldn't take that for all too long.
Second.. do you REALLY think Actiblizz would cite "artistic differences" in the current climate, if their Art Director upped and left because Actiblizz insisted on a snuttified D3?
Quote from "liquid" »Maybe he was unhappy with what Blizzard was happy with?
0
Some seemed interactive some seemed to just be there, they all looked like slain adventurers though. Let me skip through the gameplay trailer see if there is some I missed.
0
0
0
If they add guns or anything like that, I'm gone.
0
You mean THAT announcement?
If you're being sarcastic saying it's not Diablo 3 it's "WoW2" or whatever then... :rolleyes:
0
0
0
Hopefully everything on that map (that we haven't been to yet) will make at least a small appearance.
0
In basic melee yes, but when you're fighting demons with thick skin, skeletons and armored monsters I don't see what nunchucks will do.
0
I enjoyed them all.
Or at least keep open if they remove lan, then you can play with your friends still just in private games.
0
Yeah I mean the Sin War... I dunno where I got the number I've just heard it a few times.
0
I feel the same kind of, everyone seems to be focusing on small things like the lighting and glowing weapons, to hell with all that. I want my D3 ASAP, none of that is going to change gameplay, just game experience by personal opinion.
0
I thought Cain was like 380 years old?:confused:
0
Alchemy seems a lot more Diabloish than nunchucks.
They have health and mana potions, so why not poisons?
I just can't picture playing a character thats running around flailing away on things with nunchucks. They have no practical use out side of martial arts. When you're fighting hordes of demons and armored undead, I'd much rather be using a large spiked flail than a small set of wooden nunchucks.
0
Or was that much earlier before he was even born?