-
- Non_Inertial_Frame
- Registered User
-
Member for 12 years, 8 months, and 13 days
Last active Wed, Jan, 2 2013 09:21:39
- 0 Followers
- 482 Total Posts
- 19 Thanks
-
Mar 15, 2012
Non_Inertial_Frame posted a message on Diablo III Launching May 15 – Digital Pre-Sales NOW OPENSign of beta?!?!?!Posted in: News -
Jan 30, 2012
Non_Inertial_Frame posted a message on Diablo 3 Test Server Maintenance - Beta Patch 11 IncomingDoubt any of the patches will be runestone related, they've already said runestones won't be in the beta no?Posted in: News
On a side note, assuming this patch fixes the crashes and errors etc I have a feeling we could be seeing a rather large wave of beta invites coming in the next few days. Hopefully? -
Jan 27, 2012
Non_Inertial_Frame posted a message on Small Maintenance - Minor Hotfixes, Friends and Achievements to be wiped.Although I'd be willing to bet once they'd resolved the login and other issues associated with the new changes from patch 10 there is probably going to be a rather large wave of invites. Maybe I'm letting my optimistic side get the best of me, but it looks like they've removed the stuff they felt would take them too long (done), now they just need to get the itemization and skills/rune finished and tested and slam their servers into a brick wall of logins a few times.Posted in: News
-
Nov 3, 2011
Non_Inertial_Frame posted a message on Beta Patch and Character WipesAnother update.Posted in: News
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/3424470536
Tomorrow afternoon again.. why do I have a feeling this may go on for a few days.
Edit: Oops, didn't realize the 'tonight' post was on the eu forums. Noticed the post I linked to was updated today thought they changed it. My bad. -
Oct 11, 2011
Non_Inertial_Frame posted a message on Diablo III Beta Key SweepstakesLol.. they've invited like 500 people in 3 weeks, and now it seems they'll only be inviting people who sign up through facebook... beta test ? no; publicity ? yesPosted in: News
Anyone else kinda like 'really.. ?'
Don't get me wrong I'm going to facebook right now, lol. =D - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
0
0
Despite this I voted no, purely out of faith that blizzard wouldn't bring back such an epic spell from d2, only to make it terrible.
0
Edit: Ahh now the image is added, I laughed. After I realized you weren't saying he was wrong. =D
0
Judging by your post, and the way you're insulting people in this thread, I'd say you were banned forever for being either profane, or just generally rude. Also for 'telling some punk kid how it is.' Seems like a legit ban to me, Blizzard doesn't need you throwing temper tantrums on their forums every time someone disagrees with you.
0
I'd like to slightly modify the above suggestion of skill order.
Get your pets in, get right in behind them and drop a soul harvest before eels (runed grasp) and dropping back for longer range damage. Personally I prefer the triple shot poison arrows or firebats for big enemies, but whatever floats your boat.
0
0
Honestly don't understand the problem very well myself, coming from the phys side of things and no the cs one.
0
But it *doesn't* do stuff between 0 and 1. It isn't using 0s and 1s at all. Classically these are represented by a voltage, whether 5V or 0V, 1 or 0 (there are some more clever implementations but thats the basic idea.) For quantum they are represented by states of particles (or whatever) and are allowed to be both 0 and 1 simultaneously, with some associated probabilities. If you have 50% of 0, and 50% of 1, that is NOT the same as 0.5. You cannot exploit 0.5 to do anything. You cannot entangle 0.5 to something and exploit that property.
IE: If people don't care about it beyond "stuff between 0 and 1" then they simply will not understand it.
It would be like explaining to people that brain surgery actually only amounts to sticking a knife randomly in someones head through their eye.
0
A wild math/cs/phys/CO student appears.
0
It isn't a very accurate description to be honest. First of all it most definitely is not 0.1, 0.2 etc. The state 0 and 1 are not represented numerically on a quantum level. There are a variety of implementations, but one uses the spin orientation of the molecule. The 0 and 1 states are represented as up and down spin. You do not have some value "0.1", you have a particle that, with some probability, is spin up, and with some other probability, that it is spin down. (Note these probabilities must add to 1.)
The power of quantum computing is employing clever algorithms which exploit the probabilistic nature of QM. The computer you talk about would just be a higher numerical base computer, using 10 digits instead of 2, which actually isn't all that useful, like I said it is quantum nature that allows quantum computers to be powerful.
0
I didn't say it was unbreakable, I said that even a thousand super computers running parallel will still take over a billion trillion years to crack this code, on average. You guys do realize that banks use 128 key encryption to store your personal financial information. Why would someone waste their time trying to crack d3 when the same exact process could yield millions in dollar in robbing a bank.
If the game information is stored locally, the safety mechanisms can be *bypassed*. NO ONE cracked SC2 encryption code, they bypassed it and made the game work offline, as you said. They could no log into battlenet. If I'm not mistaken it also bypassed inputing your authentication key, so you actually had to reinstall the game if you wanted to play online.
Diablo 3 does not have an offline mode to exploit in this manner, and as such will no be played. At most they can datamine the information that is stored locally. Which even then would surprise me. If I had to guess I'd say the managed to crack the installer to display 0-100% install progress, but it isn't actually working. Especially considering it's been 8 hours since they were 20% completed, and no updates.
Ya the offline mode was cracked since all the game information was stored locally.
That guy doesn't know what he's talking about and clearly couldn't have read everything I wrote. Because I clearly state that it's specifically to do with the fact that game information isn't all stored locally. No one cracked SC2 and was able to log into BNET. They by-passed the encryption and got the game to work in 'offline' mode. That isn't the same thing.
I have a feeling that in that video they also managed to bypass the encryption, rather than crack it. Which means they won't be playing the game any time soon, since there doesn't exist a game world for them to play in.
0
I watched that super cop gif for like 5 minutes lol. What is that from?
0
This.
0