- ErU
- Registered User
-
Member for 17 years, 10 months, and 7 days
Last active Tue, Sep, 4 2012 00:06:14
- 1 Follower
- 515 Total Posts
- 13 Thanks
-
Jul 9, 2011ErU posted a message on The Future of Item SellingDiablo is all about finding gear and trades, how could blizzard add a store without affecting these?Posted in: News
-
Oct 22, 2010ErU posted a message on The Blizzcon HubAnd with the demon hunter, that's 5 classes from D2, returning into D3. :rolleyes:Posted in: News
Its early to say anything, but the pvp arena didn't impressed me, at all.. hopefully theres a more(a lot more) to show. -
Oct 6, 2010ErU posted a message on Blizzcon 2010 Schedule (10/22-10/23)Wait, this is the so called ''year of diablo 3'' that Bashiok mentioned?Posted in: News
2 hours of D3 and a Q/A Where they will probably be deflecting questions instead of answering?
Dear god... -
Sep 22, 2010ErU posted a message on Level 60 capPosted in: NewsQuote from italofoca
For me this is awesome news. A level 60 cap means they can add extra levels in expansions, wich is a feature that i particulary love in wow and any other rpg.
Very sweet news.
Meaning that they didn't reduced to 60 because they were having problems with it, they want to make more money by releasing lame ass downloadable (must-buy) content to raise the cap and rip people off.
I have this strange, strange feeling that D3 is not going to live up to diablo's name(in other words, FAIL). And this is the kind of news that just enforces that.. -
Jul 10, 2008ErU posted a message on Official BlizzCast 5 Q&A SubmissionsOk, english is not my first language, so dont mind any errors.Posted in: News
What are Blizzard plans regarding the current battle.net channel?
Why?
As all of you know, Diablo is a fast-paced, click and go carnificine, but, besides that, it also has a very deep economy and trade system, and this trade system is based entirely in the Battle.net channels. Looking for a iK armor? Go to Trade-useast, Found an eaglehorn and not going to keep it, you now where to go.
The trading channel is a reference when it comes down to trading, but it has one major problem.. it's hella confusing, 40 people with all kind of diferent and huge names doing they're propaganda, and when that dual leech/pris ring you was looking for catches your eye you waste 9385393 minutes trying to look for the guy, or, you try to msg him... but /pm l33Tz_arrrVzszs02324 can take too long.... long enough for him to quit battle.net, to trade with someone else, to whatever.
If i had a soj for each deal i missed because when i finally got to msg the guy his response was ''sry, just sold it''... oh well, you've got the idea.
The battle.net channel needs a re-vamp, it needs to be fast, easy to use, and user friendly. So, Blizzard, what are the current plans? - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
Dude, stop... just stop and pay attention to the game name, this is not kindergarten, and it's not about being mature either, grown-ups also say the F word you know.
It's incredible... nowsdays everything is a reason to ruin other people entertainment, graphics ruins my entertainment, pk's ruins my entertainment, and now cursing ruins my entertainment, what's next?
0
By doing this pvp in D3 better be damn good, fun, and rewarding... as sanctuary is a much safer place now.
btw diabloiii.net has a very interesting column, interview with a pk. I think it's worth reading.
http://www.diii.net/columns/671461/bone-appetit-3
0
I've never played hellgate: London, but that's not diablo, is it?
I've been reading some of the old posts, aren't you guys taking this pk vs pvp discussion a little too serious?
0
Unfortunately, yes. But OathofChaos is talking about the diablo franchise, and since D3 is not out yet, well...
0
From the very first post of this thread.
READ THIS:
Originally Posted by Max Schaefer, Senior Designer of Blizzard North
But we've decided that PKing is part of the Diablo universe. We are well aware that this does not please everyone. However, you are right: we are not apologetic about it. Not at all. Sure, we could implement a PK switch. It's a trivial coding task. But we wouldn't be being true to ourselves, and our goals as gamemakers.[/QUOTE]
0
I'm not saying it doesnt happen, i know it does, i've been there before(both getting ruined and ruining), what i said is it just doesnt happen in a very regular basis, at least not to the extent to be considered an issue in D3.
0
LOL
Anyway, i think metalgear is not talking about killing low levels, there was times i could not find a decent duel game... and after trying hours(ok minutes, i'm not that pacient) i would just go in a baal game or chaos run(D2 classic) and hostilize everyone.
Heck... to go in a game and hostilize a party of 7 lvl90+ does take some kind of elite skills(item wise, fast mouse-clicking, etc.)
0
0
The way you talk gives off the impression that pking happens at every single game, every run.
Not sure how D2 is this days, but back them... i had what, 1 pk every 40 games/runs or so, and i was a addicted player for more than 2 years, i dont think that ''pk ruins runs'' is a valid statement, and in my view, not even blizzard has a valid argument to remove it.
Yeah it sucks to get griefed(to grief, feels awesome ), but imo pking didnt happen so regurlary in D2 to the point of turning itself an issue in D3.
0
Exactly, Blizzard is not removing pk from the game because of ''it's they're game bullshit'' they are doing it because a considerable amount of the player base dislike getting griefed.
There's no such thing as ''its mine, i do it my way'', Blizzard take they're fan suggestions serious, and if enough people think that pk(or cartoonish graphics) are a nono them that's the way it's going to be.
ps: I love pk and the new graphics, but i'l trade pk for a deep pvp system anytime, anyday.
0
I was writing a very long and dense response to this, but then a saw this:
''Because it's Blizzard's game, they can do what.. mimimimi''
That alone proves you know nothing about D2 or Blizzard.
btw OP has some very good points, and i do agree that D3 will lose some of it's essence without pk, but i also think it's time to change.
0
Even if they are both barbarians the male would still be much stronger than the female, and you could say this by just looking at his size. But i do get your point you're thinkin only skillwise, i'm thinking only statwise.
But this post made me see something i had missed, gender traits would just unbalance the game(who would pick a female barb if the male has more str/vit?)
0
Lol, i just realized that... damn i'm stupid. :/
ok blizz, javs can stay.
0
OOohhh.. right, like, going into the depths of hell, wearing heavy armor, overloaded with loot, destroying demons and facing just a Diablo dude has EVERYTHING to do with day to day activities, but sure, a woman could take that beating, she has the same physical str of a man.
You're the one splitting hairs, you made the comparison of real world activities and diablo's sanctuary, not me.
0
Makes no sense to me.