Diablo 2 is just a tad outdated eh? the perspective dosent have to affact the graphics, i voted for oblivion because it obviously blows the others out of the water when it comes to graphics. As for the view/style of the game, it seems most people like the classic diablo, but i like the idea of a scroll in to 3rd person, not everybody's gonna have it the way they want just a thought.
if they made diablo 3 look like a different game or make it first person and not look like diablo 2 it would ruin they effect of diablo 2 i think they should make it look the same but not completely make things a lil better looking in graphics
I think the game will look like diablo 2 except at higher res, and with only slight style changes. Blizzard isnt going to make a game that is barely recognizeable in the screenshots. When you see a screenshot, you will know it's diablo 3, folks.
The other two diablo games used pre-rendered 3d models on low res textures. I dont know about the specifics of their models, but they might be able to use them in the game, straight up, they wont of course.
And there is no doubt that the game will be 3d, either. It essentially has to be 3d; in a game as huge as d3 will need to be, 2d would be approaching practical physical limits.
One benifit of 3d will be all the extra detail youll be able to see on a character, about equiped items and overall state. Another benifit is that there could be a lot of shared animations between different classes, such as leap attack, etc.
I want d2 graphics with the wc3 scroll down ability and the character appearance change of fable. That would make the game dessimate all
yeah that would be pretty badass to see ur d2 character grow like that, but you should be able to pick his features and such so you dont have a buncha d2 players that all look the same, like maybe u should pick a new character feature every so often from a list or something it gives you, cuz runnin around and seeing a million people that look exactly like you would get boring, and i wanna see what the armors and shit look like in d3, thatd be pretty awesome
EVEN NOW.....2006 WHERE GRAPHICS AND TECHNOLOGY ROCK......I STILL LOVE DIABL-2 GRAPHICS! AND I WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM AT ALL IF DIABLO-3 WOULD CREATED WITH THE SAME GTAPHIC-MACHINE!
BUT I HAVE TO SAY I PREFER NOT TO BE FIRST PERSON LIKE NOOBIE GAMES(WOW...LINEAGE2) ETC...I NEED DIABLO-3 BE LIKE DIABLO-2 GAME-PLAYING WITH LITTLE MORE MEGA-PIXELS IN GRAPHICS :))
i agree to an extent, the first person would really suck for dueling and such, but i would like the graphics a little different but still with the birds eye view
I think the game will look like diablo 2 except at higher res, and with only slight style changes. Blizzard isnt going to make a game that is barely recognizeable in the screenshots. When you see a screenshot, you will know it's diablo 3, folks.
The other two diablo games used pre-rendered 3d models on low res textures. I dont know about the specifics of their models, but they might be able to use them in the game, straight up, they wont of course.
And there is no doubt that the game will be 3d, either. It essentially has to be 3d; in a game as huge as d3 will need to be, 2d would be approaching practical physical limits.
One benifit of 3d will be all the extra detail youll be able to see on a character, about equiped items and overall state. Another benifit is that there could be a lot of shared animations between different classes, such as leap attack, etc.
yes but do you have any idea of what kind of computer it would take to run a 3d world like that and have skills like leap attack and teleport, looks like i better start saving ^_^, although the extra detail would be really awesome, like i said in a earlier post, im really anxious to see the armor and weapons
as long as d3 doesnt take the rediculous amount of power that Titan Quest needs to play at full performance, i'd buy.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
----------------------- "What man, anywhere under Heaven's high arch, has fought in such darkness, endured more misery or been harder pressed?" -Beowulf
It would be kewl if the graphics in D3 would be just like in D2, but alittle bit more enhanced so that everything would look much more detailed. I think that would be awsome. Thats only my view for the graphics.
thats basically wut i was trying to say in my last post or the one before it if they took away D2's graphics and made something totally different they might as well change the game name!! lol
i'd choose a fun to play game over spectacular graphics anyday.
The other two diablo games used pre-rendered 3d models on low res textures. I dont know about the specifics of their models, but they might be able to use them in the game, straight up, they wont of course.
And there is no doubt that the game will be 3d, either. It essentially has to be 3d; in a game as huge as d3 will need to be, 2d would be approaching practical physical limits.
One benifit of 3d will be all the extra detail youll be able to see on a character, about equiped items and overall state. Another benifit is that there could be a lot of shared animations between different classes, such as leap attack, etc.
i agree to an extent, the first person would really suck for dueling and such, but i would like the graphics a little different but still with the birds eye view
yes but do you have any idea of what kind of computer it would take to run a 3d world like that and have skills like leap attack and teleport, looks like i better start saving ^_^, although the extra detail would be really awesome, like i said in a earlier post, im really anxious to see the armor and weapons
"What man, anywhere under Heaven's high arch, has fought in such darkness, endured more misery or been harder pressed?"
-Beowulf