As I've said in so many words, most Diablo, Warcraft, and Starcraft fans are interchangeable in games. So I don't even think Blizzard needs to think about which games would be the most popular at the time, they only need to know that their games are popular, period.
What I've wondered is that surely by now they're so big, there would be a Blizzard North, East, South, West, all developing these different games. Or at least a North and South making Starcraft and Diablo.
- Siaynoq
- Registered User
-
Member for 17 years, 9 months, and 19 days
Last active Sun, Aug, 7 2016 20:07:13
- 50 Followers
- 15,813 Total Posts
- 221 Thanks
-
Apr 29, 2007Siaynoq posted a message on Blizzard Confirms New Product Next Month!I reckon that would instigate some letter bombs.Posted in: News
-
Apr 29, 2007Siaynoq posted a message on Blizzard Confirms New Product Next Month!Hmm, I never even considered it would be a new franchise. If that's the case, I wonder if it would be a magic/fantasy game or sciency spacey game. Or something more akin to a regular Earth setting placed in our current timeline.Posted in: News
-
Apr 29, 2007Siaynoq posted a message on Blizzard Confirms New Product Next Month!Burning Herpies would be a gay name for any game period.Posted in: News
-
Apr 27, 2007Siaynoq posted a message on Blizzard Confirms New Product Next Month!It seems like WC fans have plenty to chew on for awhile. That would be way too audacious of Blizzard to announce another WC project at this time.Posted in: News
The time is so ripe for Diablo. I'm putting my money on it. -
Apr 27, 2007Siaynoq posted a message on Blizzard Confirms New Product Next Month!This is great news. And even if it ends up not being Diablo 3, I still believe it is inevitable anyway, so I'll celebrate a Starcraft 2 just the same.Posted in: News
-
Mar 27, 2007Siaynoq posted a message on "Official" Diablo 3 PetitionI don't think it means squat. Not much, true. But I think to some extent Blizzard likes to see how much people care. Even in the end, we all petition and vote with our money, just to say we are here waiting and are anxious, I believe that means something to them.Posted in: News
-
Feb 20, 2007Siaynoq posted a message on The Final Diablo 3 is Coming argumentmassive multiplayer onlinePosted in: News
If I'm not mistaken. -
Feb 20, 2007Siaynoq posted a message on The Final Diablo 3 is Coming argument"The only argument I disagree with is that they say "Diablo 3 is a license to print money". Unless you've been under a very large rock the past year, Blizzard already has a license to print money, it's called World of Warcraft and it pulls in almost as much cash in a month as Diablo 2 has pulled in overall. The only question now is, is it worth it to sacrifice programmer power for a game that is going to generate more publicity than revenue? I imagine Blizzard has discussed the possibility of making Diablo 3 a MMO considering the success of their last shot at it."Posted in: News
I read this comment from that page and I disagree with what this person is saying. Does Blizzard necessarily need to sacrifice programming power to make another Diablo game? Isn't that what Blizzard North was founded for? I'm not sure however how I feel about Diablo being an MMO. I actually feel like you're sacrificing some quality in graphics and in-depth content to make an MMO that is designed to appeal to a wide mainstream audience. -
Oct 10, 2006Siaynoq posted a message on "Official" Diablo 3 PetitionPosted in: NewsQuote from "AcidReign" »I read that there was a petition for Peter Jackson to direct The Hobbit movie. They had 40,000 votes, and New Line Cinema was looking into it now. Hah!
Even then, I doubt a poll of 40,000 votes had any real impact. I'm sure any decision to make the Hobbit would be mostly based on the success of the LOTR trilogy in theaters and DVD sales, merchandise, etc. They know the fanbase already exists, and not just the hardcore fans either. -
Oct 9, 2006Siaynoq posted a message on "Official" Diablo 3 PetitionYes, while I'm sure a petition doesn't make a huge impact one way or another, I still believe that the people at Blizzard are interested in what fans are thinking about these games. I've noticed a lot of people are cynical about polls, but if it none of it helps, none of it certainly hurts either.Posted in: News
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
0
Huh, I always knew about who the wanderer was, and eventually came to the conclusion that the rogue was Blood Raven. But I never even considered that the sorcerer was the Summoner in the Arcane Sanctuary. What a tasteful way to reference the first game.
0
0
0
0
And they all claim to be legit, but seriously! I'll just be sticking to the single player. If only I can get through Hell, Act V. Still can't beat the Talic, Madawc, and Korlic guys.
0
The mortals, who had unique qualities about them: being finite in their existence, unpredictable, and easily swayed to either side, made them ideal for shaping the outcome of the war.
And while the Sin War was a new dynamic to the battle as a whole, most mortals did not have much understanding of it all except for just one long Great Conflict. Except of course a minority of mortals who understood things on the greater level, and were convinced or coerced into fighting each other in the name of good or evil (of course, ignorant people were also drawn into the war without really understanding what was really happening).
So I've always interpreted the Sin War as a sort of bet between the two forces to decide the fate of all creation. And both sides would be allowed to infiltrate Sanctuary posing as various things to get mortals to fight in the name of this or the name of that. Then over time as demons and angels came to either admire mortals for what they were or be jealous towards and hate them, both sides began cheating sort of and became more actively involved in the Sin War and began abandoning their methods of subterfuge.
Most importantly, since it was the Three that realized the mortals' potential in the outcome of the Great Conflict, they worked hardest of all to corrupt them. Then I suppose due to the ignorance of the Lesser Evils, the Prime Evils were overthrown and banished directly to Sanctuary. Which is ironic I suppose because this exile is exactly what allowed them to become so powerful and influence mortals the way they did, almost gaining complete victory in the end, except for that your character kills them all and destroys their soulstones.
0
By rebel, do you mean like someone who works for Hell? Or do you just hope there will be a generally rebellious character, that's a male?
0
I wonder if the soulstones were created from merely chipping pieces off the Worldstone.
Despite some of the holes or loose ends in the plot, D2 had a great storyline. That's what I look for most in a game, plus direction and music. But if D3 has at least the most former, then I'll be satisfied I'm sure.
0
Even then, I doubt a poll of 40,000 votes had any real impact. I'm sure any decision to make the Hobbit would be mostly based on the success of the LOTR trilogy in theaters and DVD sales, merchandise, etc. They know the fanbase already exists, and not just the hardcore fans either.
0
Interesting. Then does anyone know for what purpose Baal would corrupt it? Cause surely based on what you said, would allow Heaven to interfere more as much as Hell. Perhaps Baal knowing that Heaven rarely interfered with Sanctuary, but Hell often did, he wanted to make it easier for his minions enter. And was this supposed to allow Mephisto and Diablo to return?
I think there's too many unknowns about the nature of the Worldstone to say for certain.
0
0
SotC? Fill me in on that one.
0
0