• 0

    posted a message on mass effect series
    Quote from Mayne

    3rd game doesnt have that massive improvement from 1 -> 2 but it is about the same level as the 2nd.
    For the most part they had the combat all figured out by 2 so there weren't many serious changes to it that needed to be made in 3.

    And yeah I don't get why so many people think the combat in ME1 is that awful, really. My biggest problem with it was just that skills didn't really make much of a difference either way. You could be any class really and most skills had some way of temporarily disabling an enemy whether it was making them float or overloading their weapons. But I still thought it was fun. And at least ME1 has the Mako which I personally thought was a blast especially when fighting the Geth.
    Posted in: Other Games
  • 0

    posted a message on mass effect series
    Despite the controversy with the third one, overall they are definitely worth playing all the way through. The first one doesn't have the best combat mechanics, but by the time you finish the third one, you'll be sentimental for everything about the first one. And the second one is overall really great.
    Posted in: Other Games
  • 0

    posted a message on What I love so far about PoE...
    Quote from maka

    Si, add me, we can play some PoE.

    EDIT: By the way (regarding blowing one's brains out)...South Park 'Cash for Gold', anyone?
    Pfft! I'll add you, but you still haven't even played D3 beta with me yet.
    Posted in: Other Games
  • 0

    posted a message on What I love so far about PoE...
    Today was my first day playing it but I think the gameplay is pretty solid actually.
    Posted in: Other Games
  • 0

    posted a message on How to wait for diablo 3
    How To Eat With Your Butt
    Posted in: Off-Topic
  • 0

    posted a message on What I love so far about PoE...
    You what I love about Path of Exile so far? The monsters don't flash white when you hit them. I wish to god in D3 they would at least make that an option to turn on/off.

    You should know you're hitting your enemy without this arbitrary white flash occurring. In PoE, they're getting knocked back, bleeding, getting arrows lodged into them, making grunting sounds of pain, and best of all, none of them are flashing WHITE!
    Posted in: Other Games
  • 0

    posted a message on TeamPK
    I can't join any group that states you must have fun. And you don't even have an avatar. I find this indicative as a total lack of interest or commitment. I just can't trust you, ya know?
    Posted in: Clans [NA] [PC]
  • 0

    posted a message on Mass Effect
    Quote from TheDFO

    One of the giant bomb podcasts talked about that, and they make a good case for that being somewhat central to the flaws in ME3. At some point, Bioware began trumpeting this game as "a good time to get into the series" and that you "didn't need to play the other games to understand this one." Both of those statements are patently false, unless you're just playing the game like a generic FPS, and you don't care about story (in which case, ME3 would be a terrible game). It just seems like they were so in love with the idea that people can jump in blind to ME3 that they didn't bother with including lore from the rest of the trilogy.
    Well considering it was the final game of the trilogy, I can understand why they would market it as a good as game as any to start playing it. I mean heck, the beginning of the game you can actually choose an option that just makes all your choices for you so it's less of an RPG. And for those who did play ME3 and it was their first time playing any ME game, it's unlikely they did play it for the story so all along the confusing plot wouldn't have made sense but maybe they wouldn't have cared.

    Quote from TheDFO

    Oh, and personally, I didn't want a traditional happy ending. I mean, it was bad enough that we can already defend ourselves against a FLEET of Reapers, but to make some super happy ending would have just destroyed all the Reaper street cred they tried to build up as them being so super powerful.
    I felt the same way. I didn't need a happy ending at all. Maybe at least just a hopeful ending. I mean, the ending was hopeful but it felt so hamfistedly written. I think I would've been happy if for the most part the Reapers did destory or assimilate everything but only a few thousand survivors escaped them on a ship such as the Ascension. And this could be like a glimmer of hope because they start their own exodus and later turn it into a genesis in perhaps another galaxy. So therefore, unlike the previous cycles, there were just a few survivors that in the next 50,000 years might reappear in the Milky Way and truly defeat the Reapers. I think that could've been far more interesting.


    Quote from Siaynoq

    I disagree. Dr. Ray says they are improving "context," with additional custscenes and epilogues. The context that I, and many others, are upset about, is the Catalyst. I very much doubt that some custscenes can clear that up. My guess is it will be an Animal House style ending. Will see how the major characters did, who died and who didn't, and maybe some context on why Joker and the rest of the Normandy are suddenly a bunch of deserters.
    Here's why it feels like an apology to me. The content will be free. Just think about that. The day of the game's release there was the From Ashes DLC which was like 10 bucks. And now later they want to give us a bunch of content for free. Seems rather uncharacteristic of them at this point to do that unless it really is just an apology.

    Quote from TheDFO

    Why is the VI taking the form of the little kid?
    My interpretation of that is it was some kind of lame Contact like thing where the computer thing just scanned Shepherd's mind and found the image of the child there and took that form in order to more easily relate to Shephered.

    Quote from TheDFO
    Why does it feel that war between synthetic and organical life is envitable?
    More importantly, why do the Reapers actually be the ones who are making it inevitable? I mean just think about it. This is the thing that drives crazy about the whole kid AI explanation. The Reapers come and start everything over by wiping everything out or assimilating it, and this is what prevents organics and synthetics from eventually destroying each other? As if they know that a possible war between organics and synthetics will somehow be more destructive than the actual destruction wrought by the Reapers. This makes...NO...sense! It made far, far more sense when the Reapers just did what they did because they were trying to contrive their own evolution. They reached the limits of their own natural evolution it seemed. So in an attempt to move further ahead the evolutionary flowchart, they let the galaxy flourish for 50k years at a time so they could come in and absorb whatever they could to make themselves stronger and to advance more. This, this actually makes sense. And this also, was the explanation of the Reaper's motives as early as the first game and I really liked it. Then in one fell swoop, they ruined all logic of the Reaper's by having that kid AI say that he's killing all of you so you don't kill yourselves. It's stupid, man.

    Quote from TheDFO
    Why does Shep just stand there and take it, with no options to argue (uh, if the Qurians and Geth can get along, and it turns out the Geth never actually wanted to kill us, and the only true Synthetics were either confused, as EDI was when she was the malfunctioning luna base VI, or defending themselves, as the Geth and that one computer in the first game)?
    I honestly think it's because the writers here got lazy. All those who played all three games were wondering all this too. It seemed there were tons of ways to defeat the kid AI with logic just as all these exceptional things you cited there had occurred. But the writers just didn't feel like taking it all into account. They just created a blanket solution to all the game's pragmatic philosophies and possibilities.

    Quote from TheDFO
    Why does destroying the reapers (and organic/synthetic hybrid) destroy the Geth (a pure synthetic race)?
    Why does destroying the reapers kill me?
    Who else does destroying the reapers kill? Any one with Cybernetics? Anything with computer intellegence (AI/VI)?
    What kind of insane space magic is the synthesis option, and how does it actually help anything?
    I thought the ending was supposed just be all technology being wiped out. I guess I misunderstood what was happening. Although I didn't even know which option I was choosing anyway even though I heard all three options pretty much end the same. Yeah and the whole synthesis thing was stupid too. If the synthesis was an option all along, they didn't the kid AI just force that in the beginning instead of repeating this cycle of destruction and assimilation every 50k years?

    Quote from TheDFO
    If the Crucible is several cycles old, how was the Citadel added to it, if the first thing the Reapers always captured was the Citadel?
    How could any race put together enough resistance to build even part of the Crucible if they did not have access to Relays?
    A few things I guess. For one, it does actually take time for the Reapers to conquer the galaxy as you saw in ME3. And remember the difference in this cycle was that the Reapers didn't come through the Citadel relay otherwise the galaxy would've been conquered much faster. Shepherd stopped that part of the plan and it bought everyone some time. And also, the Crucible never got close to being finished in previous cycles because the Reapers did come through the Citadel relay. Maybe in previous cycles they thought they could capture the Citadel long enough to use it with the Crucible which is why it failed in previous cycles.

    Quote from TheDFO
    If the Catalyst is controling the Reapers, it predates the Reapers. And if the Catalyst is required to activate the Crucible, does that mean the Catalyst created the Crucible? If so, why? If not, then why would it allow itself to work at odds to it's own goals?
    If the Catalyst controls the reapers, it presumably controls the citadel and the keepers. If so, how come it couldn't fix the Citadel, allowing the Reapers to use it as a Relay?
    I seriously doubt the writers themselves have the faintest clue.


    Quote from TheDFO
    If the goal is to prevent Synthetic/Organic war, then why wait 50k years? Just wipe out any race advanced enough to gain ME tech.
    Why is the real simple goal of preventing organic life from creating synthetic life under the idea that synthetic life will always try and kill organic life so amazingly complex that the Reapers wouldn't even tell us that?
    If the reapers goals are to prevent synthetic life from wiping out organic life, why would they work with the Geth at all?
    Again, it's because this motive doesn't make sense and it wasn't created as their motive until ME3. I was saddened by it, really. The Reapers seemed totally in control of what they did. They were in control of their own destinies. But then you just find out they're pawns of a great power which I thought was depressing. Suddenly the Reapers lost all their presence, all their threat.

    Quote from TheDFO
    It also bugs me that so many people are focusing on what I feel are either very minor flaws (why don't we know what happened to the rest of our squad) or are not flaws at all (why can't we have a super happy ending)?
    Yeah it wasn't that necessary to know what happened to the rest of the crew. I certainly was pissed to keep seeing Joker so much in the final cutscene. I was like, "Go on git! Git outta here!" I fucking hate Joker though. To be fair, I fucking hate Seth Green.
    Posted in: Other Games
  • 0

    posted a message on The NightWalkers Only Recruiting Hardcore
    Ah, I'd rip on him for that too actually.

    Myself, I've been trying to form a real life clan. I don't have any friends in real life that play video games, but I found a few employees at the local coffee shop who are lined up to join me.
    Posted in: Clans [NA] [PC]
  • 0

    posted a message on The NightWalkers Only Recruiting Hardcore
    Quote from Walbert

    So even though I'm 17 and in the Army protecting you I can't join your clan?
    LOL

    Well someone in the Army should have an appreciation of an organization's rules, right?
    Posted in: Clans [NA] [PC]
  • 0

    posted a message on From D2 to WoW to D3... Environments
    Screens from D1 is really necessary for a full perspective isn't it?
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Unlock #3 - Developer Diary II, Battle.net Updated ToU
    Blizzard: May 15....so close......MUST sustain hype....machine!
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • 0

    posted a message on PC System advice.
    Yeah I mean even though a quad core isn't totally necessary, I'd certainly recommend it to get the full benefit of your GPU. Ram's a cheap upgrade. Always upgrade RAM.
    Posted in: Technical Support
  • 0

    posted a message on Ultimate Random Chat Thread [URT] v4
    Quote from Trannsvaal

    PS. I'm as wasted as fuck :P
    No one fucking gives a shit.
    Posted in: Off-Topic
  • 2

    posted a message on Why is blizzard making D3 like WoW?
    Sorry, but I'm retired now.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.