Siaynoq, you completely destroyed the point I was trying to get across.
Just because you can read what I wrote doesn't mean you can pick it apart and think you know exactly what I was meaning.
5 people can say the same exact thing and all of them can mean something completely different.
Me and you can look at my post and you can see something completely different than what I intended.
Doen't mean it is correct.
Me using "Proposed" means exactly this; and we all know this is true.
Just because a president says they are going to do something; doesn't mean it will get done or not. Hell, there's a chance it won't get done in that way even.
He has very good "proposed" ideas, but Congress could tear it apart so badly that it might not even be the way he intended by the time it becomes passed into law.
Don't think I'm tearing him down.
I am merely saying there is a lot that stands in a man's way of getting things done.
And for a president you have so many factors that can hinder you. Our government is rediculous.
Just like our "Hidden Taxes".
We are taxed on so many things that aren't even made public.
30% of our gas price is a tax from the government.
I like how Obama wants to set up a website so we can see what is being taxed and where our tax dollars are going, but we don't know what CONGRESS will still make hidden.
Quote from "VegasRage" »
We won't get out of this, no one seems to ask the most basic questions like:
* Where are we going to get the money?
* How are we going to even begin to pay down a $15,000,000,000,000 and growing national debt?
* Will our ROI realized in 10 to 20 years do enough to avert certain fiscal catastrophe?
* How will we not default on our national debt?
* How is our debased dollar going to recover?
* How long will China keep on loaning us money they know we can't repay?
There are a lot of people rooting for Obama on blind faith things are going to work out, but lack the facts of what is happening.
I agree with what you are saying.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Watching 240 guys talk trash about cavaliers is like two retards having a slapfight over a sippy cup.
Siaynoq, you completely destroyed the point I was trying to get across.
Me using "Proposed" means exactly this; and we all know this is true.
Just because a president says they are going to do something; doesn't mean it will get done or not. Hell, there's a chance it won't get done in that way even.
Whatever. You still failed to address the other points I was making. The ones that were even more relevant. So we have a different idea on what is meant by "proposed". So what? All I was imploring you to do was elaborate and avoid being vague.
Whatever. You still failed to address the other points I was making. The ones that were even more relevant. So we have a different idea on what is meant by "proposed". So what? All I was imploring you to do was elaborate and avoid being vague.
Ok.
Judge a man not based on his color but by his actions.
That's basically what I meant.
Whether Obama is African American or not is irrelevant to the fact that he is still our President.
And we should look up to him as so.
The one leading our country. Color shouldn't have a damn thing to do with it.
He isn't out to only help African Americans; he is out for a much greater cause.
We are in an Economic Crisis and his main concern is helping us get out of this Economic Depression.
Better? :rolleyes:
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Watching 240 guys talk trash about cavaliers is like two retards having a slapfight over a sippy cup.
Judge a man not based on his color but by his actions.
That's basically what I meant.
Whether Obama is African American or not is irrelevant to the fact that he is still our President.
And we should look up to him as so.
The one leading our country. Color shouldn't have a damn thing to do with it.
He isn't out to only help African Americans; he is out for a much greater cause.
We are in an Economic Crisis and his main concern is helping us get out of this Economic Depression.
Well I do agree with you. Dont judge a book by its cover, but it happens in politics. People vote for whomever they relate to more. If you blame African Americans of voting for Barack Obama because he is African America, then you have to blame the White blue color voter who votes for Mccain...gotta be fair
I personally, liked Dr. Ron Paul.
He was a republican that seemed to be a combination of both parties.
He had some really good ideas and I agree with a lot of what he says.
He's a really smart guy.
I've seen and like a lot of Obama's ideas, but I fear that Congress is going to screw a lot of it up.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Watching 240 guys talk trash about cavaliers is like two retards having a slapfight over a sippy cup.
Congress won't screw up anything since the the democrats have the majority. Ron Paul is a smart guy, just not a good politician. I liked him the most out of the republican candidates.
So, if a person is a democrat they are infallible? :confused:
I don't think so Obama was a better choice on many fronts, McCain never had a chance and I get to say that as I said that the moment he won the party nomination. I voted for Obama because I knew it was going to boil down to McCain and Obama and he was the better of the two in my estimation. I don't think McCain is a bad guy mind you, I just don't think he was going to represent us very well, he just mirrored Bush too closely.
That said I think Ron Paul was the best with respect to economy, I just knew he too stood a zero chance of winning. The Democrats and Republicans are both wrong the economy. Both wanted a bailout and voted for it, and Bush blessed it. Both were for a stimulus (just their own brand of stimulus) and ended up mewing over a trite $30 billion out of a massive nearly $800 billion, so either way each party was for spending, er I mean investing.
I'm not for additional spending, neither party nor any of the Keynesian economists can explain where the money is coming from nor seem to care, let alone bother asking. That should scare the hell out of us all. They all just seem real comfy with the idea the money is going to magically fly out Bernanke's ass on a rainbow like they were Lucky Charms.
I really don't understand this New World Order thing... Seems like a logistical nightmare too me
China + India + Russia = probably over half the worlds population. Say, are they going to be apart of this 'New World Order? - It wouldn't seem so... Perhaps they should at least subtract the word 'World' out of the phrase
As of now I have lost faith in the American government, but do realize that Obama is carrying alot on his shoulders. I can understand if it doesn't work the way he planned.
This bill alone will (i fear) forever cripple the United States if it does not succeed.
I Liked when Ron Paul was speaking with all the other Republican candidates and McCain was making fun of him.
McCain has nothing good to say.. so he resorted to poking fun at his ideas.
McCain is an asshole.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Watching 240 guys talk trash about cavaliers is like two retards having a slapfight over a sippy cup.
I Liked when Ron Paul was speaking with all the other Republican candidates and McCain was making fun of him.
McCain has nothing good to say.. so he resorted to poking fun at his ideas.
McCain is an asshole.
Lol i remember that. And yes I think you are right. Remember the debates, and mccain would just make faces while obama talked?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Just because you can read what I wrote doesn't mean you can pick it apart and think you know exactly what I was meaning.
5 people can say the same exact thing and all of them can mean something completely different.
Me and you can look at my post and you can see something completely different than what I intended.
Doen't mean it is correct.
Me using "Proposed" means exactly this; and we all know this is true.
Just because a president says they are going to do something; doesn't mean it will get done or not. Hell, there's a chance it won't get done in that way even.
He has very good "proposed" ideas, but Congress could tear it apart so badly that it might not even be the way he intended by the time it becomes passed into law.
Don't think I'm tearing him down.
I am merely saying there is a lot that stands in a man's way of getting things done.
And for a president you have so many factors that can hinder you. Our government is rediculous.
Just like our "Hidden Taxes".
We are taxed on so many things that aren't even made public.
30% of our gas price is a tax from the government.
I like how Obama wants to set up a website so we can see what is being taxed and where our tax dollars are going, but we don't know what CONGRESS will still make hidden.
I agree with what you are saying.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=220252&title=cnbc-gives-financial-advice
One of his best
i always thought that Jim Kramer bloke was a wank...
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."
Peter Schiff was right 2006-2007 - CNBC edition
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0YTY5TWtmU
Peter Schiff Was Right 2006 - 2007 (2nd Edition)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0YTY5TWtmU
Siaynoq's Playthroughs
Ok.
Judge a man not based on his color but by his actions.
That's basically what I meant.
Whether Obama is African American or not is irrelevant to the fact that he is still our President.
And we should look up to him as so.
The one leading our country. Color shouldn't have a damn thing to do with it.
He isn't out to only help African Americans; he is out for a much greater cause.
We are in an Economic Crisis and his main concern is helping us get out of this Economic Depression.
Better? :rolleyes:
You sounded more sarcastic in your first argument
I honestly wasn't meaning too.
I have a weird way of wording things and I tend to get a little carried away.
I personally, liked Dr. Ron Paul.
He was a republican that seemed to be a combination of both parties.
He had some really good ideas and I agree with a lot of what he says.
He's a really smart guy.
I've seen and like a lot of Obama's ideas, but I fear that Congress is going to screw a lot of it up.
I vote for the candidate I feel is best suited to run the United States.
Whether it be Republican, Democrat, or Other.
Each side has it's flaws and stereotypes.
That said I think Ron Paul was the best with respect to economy, I just knew he too stood a zero chance of winning. The Democrats and Republicans are both wrong the economy. Both wanted a bailout and voted for it, and Bush blessed it. Both were for a stimulus (just their own brand of stimulus) and ended up mewing over a trite $30 billion out of a massive nearly $800 billion, so either way each party was for spending, er I mean investing.
I'm not for additional spending, neither party nor any of the Keynesian economists can explain where the money is coming from nor seem to care, let alone bother asking. That should scare the hell out of us all. They all just seem real comfy with the idea the money is going to magically fly out Bernanke's ass on a rainbow like they were Lucky Charms.
I couldn't have said it better myself.
Nevermind, I realized what Explorer was talking about when I was at school today
China + India + Russia = probably over half the worlds population. Say, are they going to be apart of this 'New World Order? - It wouldn't seem so... Perhaps they should at least subtract the word 'World' out of the phrase
This bill alone will (i fear) forever cripple the United States if it does not succeed.
McCain has nothing good to say.. so he resorted to poking fun at his ideas.
McCain is an asshole.