• 0

    posted a message on Affixes
    Yeah, I think just a straight-up table would work best for this page. Since the affixes are the only focal point for the page, there's no reason we'd want to have them be collapsible and you know my position on the sortable part by this point. :)
    Posted in: DiabloWiki
  • 0

    posted a message on Affixes
    Well, I think there are pros and cons to doing it both ways, but yours certainly looks nicer and works just as well so we might as well go with that.
    Posted in: DiabloWiki
  • 0

    posted a message on Motivational Pic Thread
    And last, but certainly not least:
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on Affixes
    See my edit ^
    Posted in: DiabloWiki
  • 0

    posted a message on Affixes
    I don't see anything in the link in your post or anything new in the one in mine.

    EDIT: and all the items that spawn with that particular range of bonuses are in once cell. The name "Beryl" might spawn on regular items, all charm sizes, and jewels, but has a different range of bonuses for each. That's why they need to be separated.
    Posted in: DiabloWiki
  • 0

    posted a message on Affixes
    OK, example's up.
    Posted in: DiabloWiki
  • 0

    posted a message on Affixes
    Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »
    The list doesn't even necessarily have to be sorteable. If the items are just entered in a logical way to begin with, it will be apparent from the beginning what items a given affix spawns on and what not.


    Yeah, like I've said, if we make this new list sortable, there's very little point in redoing it at all, since we'll still have to put in individual entries for every affix/item combination and it won't help to reduce the current bulk at all. So basically what I'm thinking is that we'll have:

    Beryl
    Viridian
    Jade
    Emerald ^All for normal equippable items

    Beryl
    Viridian
    Jade
    Emerald ^All for Grand Charms

    Beryl
    Viridian
    Jade
    Emerald ^All for Large Charms

    Beryl
    Viridian
    Jade
    Emerald ^All for Small Charms

    Beryl
    Jade ^For Jewels

    within each category...obviously Poison Resistance here.
    Posted in: DiabloWiki
  • 0

    posted a message on Set/Legendary/Unique reappearances you want again
    It might be cool if they made something like the Bul'Kathos set not utterly worthless.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Affixes
    Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »
    I see what you mean. Still, it's a lot of extra space if you have to add two extra sections under each group. You still haven't told me the significance of separating charms and jewels from all other items.


    Yeah..see my edit ^
    Posted in: DiabloWiki
  • 0

    posted a message on Affixes
    Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »
    That's still a lot of headers? I mean, you'd have to double the amount of bold headers you have everywhere, it just makes the list that much longer.

    Why not include Charms and Jewels in the affix lists directly?


    EDIT: I'm dumb. This'll work and look much better, and I'm pretty sure that's what you're going for:
    I can just put them in with the regular items, but separate them out within that category. Like for Poison Resistance, I'd have the 4 affixes that can occur on regular items followed by the 12 that can occur on charms (4 for each size) and then the 2 that can exist on jewels. That what you're going for?
    Posted in: DiabloWiki
  • 0

    posted a message on Possible 5th Class - DHAMPIR
    Quote from "shibblicious" »
    he is also half Demon (Vampire counts as a demon no?)


    I think Vampires count as undead. So if he were half human and half undead, would that make him some sort of weird 1/4 deadsy 3/4 alivesy type thing? I'm confused. :confused:

    Also, unless I'm mistaken, humans in Sanctuary are already half demon, half angel. Granted, there's a good chance that I am, indeed, mistaken.
    Posted in: Unannounced Class
  • 0

    posted a message on Affixes
    Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »
    Why so? It is after all supposed to be a master list, and if I look for what items can give me extra damage, I want to know if charms/jewels can as well.


    Good point...how about this: I'm planning to separate the different categories within a header with just bolded type, i.e.
    ===+Elemental Resistance===
    Cold Resistance
    blah blah blah
    Fire Resistance
    yadda yadda
    Lighting Resistance
    and etc.

    So I can just make a bolded section for charms/jewels within the proper header, yeah?
    Posted in: DiabloWiki
  • 0

    posted a message on Affixes
    Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »
    But it's all in the master list on the affix page, which is what we're talking about.


    Mmk. Well, in that case, how about if we separate the Charms/Jewels from the rest of the regular items? That way they'll still be on the page, but they won't be mucking up the regular item categories.

    Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »
    Agreed. One for AR and Damage, and put all related to that there.

    Ok then, I'll make a +AR/ED category for those and Fool's and then throw Grinding into just the regular ED category.
    Posted in: DiabloWiki
  • 0

    posted a message on Affixes
    Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »
    Actually, there are a few min/max damage prefixes, charms and others ;)

    Fool's should perhaps be listed on both places?


    Yeah, but we were gonna make separate pages for the charms, remember? :)

    I can definitely throw Fool's in both places since it's only 1 affix. Do you think things like Sharp through Grandmaster's should be in the AR and ED categories both too? They do both obviously, but there's a lot more there than just Fool's. If we want to put those in both sections, it might be a better idea to just make a Header of their own.
    Posted in: DiabloWiki
  • 0

    posted a message on Your favorite guitarist?
    I'd have to cast my vote for SRV, but since he's already been mentioned, I've gotta give some props to my hometown hero, Trace Bundy. Amazing finger-style guitarist.
    Jalan Crossland also does some pretty sweet finger-style stuff, but mostly plays (still awesome) bluegrass. There are also some pretty amazing flamenco players out there like Paco Peña and Paco de Lucia. Also, I can't believe no one has mentioned Rod y Gab yet!
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.