Quote fromI'm gonna guess a generic "Ranger" class because we've already had Rogue/Amazon/Druid and they need a ranged fighter and a nature-magic user, and "Ranger" covers both of those. Actually, I have a theory they're gonna have 6 classes in the game because at this point the game is mostly likely not coming out until 2011, which gives them more time, and I'm sure they have too many ideas to fit into 5 classes.
They are probably going to have 7 classes, like last time, with two being part of the expansion.
There's no reason for the monk to not be the range character.
He could fill the holy/range part just fine.
0
But I do pass gas.
Does anybody want to know how I pass gas?
Anybody?
0
He may not have reacted for two reasons:
1. He's knocked out.
2. It worked so well before that he had total faith in his friends ability and now he's in shock.
I mean this respectfully. Mexicans, Russians, and Japanese have some of the most interesting shows in the world.
0
In fact, I've currently paused it and it might stay there for a while.
The guy with the can should have teamed up with this woman.
It would have gone better.
0
If that's the intent, that's better.
However, from what I've read, the author of the thread didn't make it seem that way. His description made it sound more limiting.
I don't mind having the trees completely open and having the abilities being open dependent upon the character level. That's fine.
0
I was sort of more concerned about the guy with the pointy arrows myself. They should have checked to see how his aim was.
It appears a little more to the left and up and it would have worked just fine.
0
I study economics and downturns are completely normal and should not be mitigated by spending. The best way to minimize harm during downtimes is to allow maximal freedom of how people spend their money, not take on useless debt.
I don't mind governments spending money on capital projects, but only states should do capital projects, not the feds. The feds should be limited to national objectives, not intrusion on state responsibilities.
0
I guess I'd have to see how it plays out to know for sure if I like it.
The way the person described it, it sounds like I choose a character and then I, as long as I'm playing that particular character, choose a path of abilities to stick with to the end of the game. If I choose a sorcerer and I've chosen flame, I can't choose ice later.
It sounds like it's removing choices to me.
I think a person should be able to customize their characters as freely as possible and whenever they feel like it.
That's different. If I find that I don't like the sorcerer class, that's fine.
However, with this proposal, if I choose a sorcer-fire, and I don't like it. I'd have to kill off the character completely in order to try something different. It sounds inefficient to me.
0
I hope I did it correctly.
If it doesn't work up there, try below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYkpt1YEo8o
0
I view it differently. In D2, if I became a barbarian, I could experiment within the class and see what works with what Blizzard gives me. It sounds like that if I become a barbarian in D3, and choose a barbarian and lock myself into a bow and arrow class, I can't decide that I don't like it and switch to axe.
I don't like that.
0
I quote, learn a specialized skill tree that would orient them towards what magic focus they want if you follow a quest line once you enter the first town upon entering the normal difficulty. So essentially 2 basic trees and the specialized tree for mages\sorceresses."
It sounds pretty locked in to me.
Having it similar to D2 is probably, I think the best way to go. It allowed somebody to focus on specific spells and allowed for experimentation.
I hope for something similar in D3.
0
Since it was Obama that doubled the debt, I vote letting him and his supporters assume the debt.
0
I'd prefer to waste a skill point on a specific skill to see if it has potential. If it doesn't work, I've only wasted one or two points, as opposed to an entire character.
0
0
The only way most women can be as big as a guy is when they've also been overeating for 20 years.
And what I said was obviously a joke. Didn't you see the smiley?
Did you know that one sign of intelligence is the ability to get jokes?
0
Life should be reflected in the game.
Woman are at a disadvantage in real life: they get pregnant, they're usually smaller and weaker (and some say less intelligent).
It's only reasonable that they be at a disadvantage in the game as well.:cool: