• 0

    posted a message on Critical hit display numbers
    Quote from "deathMars" »
    You are trying to provoke me, which is kind of stupid coming from a guy with 13 posts. I thought we were having a discussion, but you needed to show your attitude and rudeness. What's wrong with you?

    Not trying to provoke at all. Trying to save Kelka some time. No attitude and/or rudeness was used there. My bad if you took offense.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Critical hit display numbers
    Kefka honestly, just stop trying to convince this guy. He's close-minded to any other ideas and he's made up his mind.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Critical hit display numbers
    Quote from "deathMars" »
    Cuz it just looks stupid. And plus it shows that Blizzard is losing its confidence that it once had.

    Lol...

    Ah forget it, this is completely off-topic now and it's a lost cause to continue debating...
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Best Drink?
    Hey, which is your favorite Soft Drink/Soda out of the following?
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on Critical hit display numbers
    Quote from "deathMars" »
    Well, you can also do something else:

    Step 1: Go to your skill tree
    Step 2: Hover over your desired skill
    Step 3: Look down to the damage.
    Step 4: Read it
    Step 5: Remember it.

    Or.... If you dont mind "flying numbers" turn on the numbers and see it for yourself. Saves so much time. I really dont see the debate here, YOU CAN TURN IT OFF. Like it's really not even an issue, if you have the crit number addition, it pleases both kinds of players, people who: "dont care if they do 1983 or 1893 dmg and just want the job done" or other players who want to know precise dmg because you can either turn it ON or OFF. I really dont get why theres a debate. If the question was: "Will you turn on crit numbers or not", then this would be a different story. But people, it's NOT.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Critical hit display numbers
    Quote from "Siaynoq" »
    I voted against it. I hate numbers floating out of people. It reminds me too much of Warcraft and even Final Fantasy.

    Yes, but what you aren't realizing is that Blizzard will most probably make it an option so we can turn it on/off. So why not have that extra feature to check our damage at times? It an extra feature that will increase the pleasure of the Diablo world for all players, PvP or PvE.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Critical hit display numbers
    Really don't know why you guys are all "anti-crit numbers." They arent showing every damage count, they are showing when you pull off a crit. You'll be able to see how much damage you're actually critting for, and we all know Blizzard is smart and wont make em huge numbers which cover up your whole screen, let alone make a way to turn them off. It's a great addition and we should be thankful that they are actually putting in-depth thought into the game.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Which is your favourite Act from D2 and D2:LOD and why?
    I was debating whether Act 1 or 5. They are my two favorite... I love Act 1 because it always reminds me of the first time I played Diablo and I love the quests there, but Act 5 because I've spent so much time there due to lvling and such. I just love the town of Harrogath.

    I would have to say that Act 3 is my least favorite in general just because I find it feels... unpolished... I dont know how to explain it but just like blizzard didnt spend enough time on it compared to the other acts. It just doesnt attract my attention like the other acts do. Anyone feel this way about it too?
    Posted in: Diablo II
  • 0

    posted a message on Poll Question
    Quote from "deathMars" »
    I think it's because you're new here.

    Oh okay, there's like a limit or something that we have to achieve before we can post polls?
    Posted in: Site Feedback
  • 0

    posted a message on Poll Question
    Hey,

    I'm just curious because I've posted like two polls that I thought had relevant material, but they dont seem to be appearing... I know a staff member has to approve it or whatever but when will it be approved? I did em about a week ago I believe... Anyways, just let me know. Thanks!

    -Ora.
    Posted in: Site Feedback
  • 0

    posted a message on This is how the Witch Doctor Should Look like!
    Wow... Honestly... No.

    If the witch doctor is that... thing, then you will never see me playing one.

    That is a monstrosity and an insult to Blizzard's creative side. I know Blizzard can do much, much better than a skeleton with a layer of skin as a character class, and I'm sure they wont disappoint.

    I mean, can that zombie even wield a shield without it's anorexic arm falling off? Or possibly lift his arm to cast a spell?

    Horrible picture, the current artwork and ideas are much better.

    -Ora.
    (This might sound harsh, but it's 100% honest. Feel free to agree or disagree :))
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Which is your favourite Act from D2 and D2:LOD and why?
    Which is your favorite act from Diablo2+LoD?
    Posted in: Diablo II
  • 0

    posted a message on lvl 99 or....
    Lvl 99 is perfect. No need to go higher and no need for it to be easily accessed.

    PvP = Gear

    A lvl 90 vs a llvl 85 is pretty much a fair fight.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Top 10 Monsters You'd Hate To See in Diablo III
    I agree with a few of those: Leapers, Swarms, Vampires, and a few others.

    But some of them, aboslutely not. He hates on some units that really weren't all that bad.
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo III Website Animation Updates
    Here's what I thought:

    I took this update as a sign. In my opinion it means that Tyrael is corrupted.
    And since they havent updated the storyline yet for D3, I'm thinking Tyrael is going
    to be the villain/boss. Because remember when in D1 the champion gets corrupted to
    become Diablo in D2, well in the cinematic at the end of D2:LOD, you see Tyrael throwing
    a sword into the giant soulstone and possibly getting corrupted from doing so. The new wings look more demonic and ''bat like,'' and he seems to have gotten a bit darker.

    This is just my personal opinion, but I took this update as a clear sign for D3.

    Tell me what you think, same as me?

    Ora.
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.