-
- Ora.
- Registered User
-
Member for 15 years, 3 months, and 26 days
Last active Sun, Mar, 8 2009 15:24:00
- 0 Followers
- 134 Total Posts
- 0 Thanks
-
Mar 2, 2009Ora. posted a message on Diablo III Trade and EconomyWell i hope it stays the way it was in D2 maybe even add an auction house, but mann i hateed the way WoW trading worked.. binding items to you... was lame. you had to raid to get items and if you couldnt get a good group you couldnt do anything, was extremely frustrating.Posted in: News
-
Feb 24, 2009Ora. posted a message on Blizzard Announces Theme Park Contesthmm.. well i'd love to do this... i've played roller coaster tycoon, sim theme park, etc. religiously... i've mastered the hardest levels in those games so i would know exactly what to do except one problem.... i cant draw for shit! ahahha so yeh.. is there like another way we can submit this? hahahaPosted in: News
-
Feb 21, 2009Ora. posted a message on Blizzard Poll: Which Class Will You Play First?For me... Probably the wizard out of the three but I got to admit... I'm not a big fan of any of the three so far... I need a PALADIN OF THE SORT!!! The barb looks good, but I mean it's a barb.. Never been that big of a fan of the barb... Witch Doctor looks sooo support that he couldnt do anything on his own.. Maybe if he had some kind of direct damage.. Like a spear or spirit or some dmg dealing skill... and the Wizard well, she's the typical spell caster.. So yeah, out of those three the wizard but I am dieingggg to know the two remaining classes!!!!Posted in: News
-
Feb 13, 2009Ora. posted a message on Blizzard Poll: Which Class Will You Play First?So far it's pretty split at like almost 33% each class!Posted in: News
But..
I refuse to vote until the two remaining classes have been announced!
I dont see why I would vote for one of these three when I might not actually play them first if one of the two remaining classes appeals to me more than any of these three.
-
Dec 27, 2008Ora. posted a message on Top 10 Monsters You'd Hate To See in Diablo IIII agree with a few of those: Leapers, Swarms, Vampires, and a few others.Posted in: News
But some of them, aboslutely not. He hates on some units that really weren't all that bad. -
Dec 27, 2008Ora. posted a message on Diablo III Website Animation UpdatesHere's what I thought:Posted in: News
I took this update as a sign. In my opinion it means that Tyrael is corrupted.
And since they havent updated the storyline yet for D3, I'm thinking Tyrael is going
to be the villain/boss. Because remember when in D1 the champion gets corrupted to
become Diablo in D2, well in the cinematic at the end of D2:LOD, you see Tyrael throwing
a sword into the giant soulstone and possibly getting corrupted from doing so. The new wings look more demonic and ''bat like,'' and he seems to have gotten a bit darker.
This is just my personal opinion, but I took this update as a clear sign for D3.
Tell me what you think, same as me?
Ora. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
If you remember the LoD cinematic with the King getting pwned by Baal, that's a pretty grand structure if you ask me. Something that with modern technology probly couldnt be made either. (Remember dude.. It's a game, not reality. Fantasyyy)
You're jumping the gun, let the game develop. You know that Blizzard is doing what's in the game's best interest so just give it time.
And even if they come out with something you dont like, remember it's Diablo3 and chances are you'll adapt to it and spend countless hours on it.
Imo people are freaking out too much about it's development... I think we all know that whatever they come out with we will ALL be playing it... Unless they royally mess up... (99% sure that Blizzard wont royally mess up.)
0
When making a new character, the class kind of self-determines whether it'll be male or female for me.
0
hmm entrances? such as the durance of hate?
0
But since there are not many negatives about the acts I dont like, i'll explain those. (I do like certain things about acts 3+4 , but I'll just focus on the negatives.)
Act 3: Lame Monsters imo... Like other than the High Council i found the monsters pretty damn lame... Hell, even Mephisto was a little weak looking imo. (Not to mention.. ANNOYING monsters!)
Wasnt a big fan of the scenery... The jungle got lame after the first quest, and I hate how EVERYTHING was a giant maze.
(Loved the Gidbin quest though... Just thought I'd put that in there.)
Act 4: Too short, felt like it was half-assed imo.
Scenery was cool, but was expecting a lot more since it was Diablo's act.
I hated those leapers and those stupid burning souls or whatever they were.
(Although anti-climactic, Diablo's death was relatively interesting with his soul going into his mouth and stuff.)
They're all good acts though imo.
0
That's disgusting... If it's actually 4 I'm going to be extremely disappointed...
0
0
i agree, even 10 or 12 i'd say... It's so much fun playing with a lot of people and I love the fact that the monsters get harder for the increased amount of people in the game. If your comp lags that badly with like 10-15 people in one game, then maybe it's time to update your computer
0
Wow.... Way to blow things completely out of proportion... We just wanted to know how much we hit for. And actually it's really not for "annoying kids who can't put one and two together", it's for a certain group of players who like to know the exact amount of damage they are doing, what's the problem with that?
0
Umm.. people? I do believe I am a person and would fit into the category of people, yet I want the feature.. So... Speak for yourself please.
0
0
I think you're right... People are choosing this act just because it's fast and easy to get rushed through... They aren't thinking of the content and environment of the other 4 acts...
0
In my opinion, it shows... I've always found it weird how every act has 6 quests but Act 4... I admit Izual and Hellforge were cool quests but if Blizzard spent a little extra time on them and the environment of Act 4, they could've made it an insanely cool act.
0
but i mean the environment in act 4 is kinda lame... are people picking act 4 just because of diablo?
0
I understand your point and ur concern but just to go back to the part where you say he's assuming. Yes, he might be assuming that there will be an option to turn on/off, but it's a positive assumption since Blizzard normally likes to please all players and they wouldnt leave out something like that.
On the other hand, you are assuming as well to think that Blizzard wont add that option. Your assuming negatively, seeing that without that option it's like if Blizzard got lazy and used an easy escape route which they normally dont do.
And yes, even I'm assuming but since the game isnt near release all we will get is assumptions from everyone. So please dont focus on the part of assuming.
0
THANK YOU!!!
Finally someone puts what me and Kefka have been trying to say for the last 3 pages in a clear and understandable way.
Gratz on this amazing post.