i really wish they would have taken some of these changes to the diablo 3 lobby into consideration when the game was still in beta and these were made it would have made the game feel a lot more like its predecessor and would have really given it more of a community feel
Great news about duping but I'm sure it will reduce dupes but not so sure it will really stop the dupers unless both the old "hacked/stolen item" and the restored item gets account bound.
I think that the TW server change should be brought to the US and EU servers as well. No reason for somebody to sell an item they restore anyway. If they're concerned about it for profit they should look after it in the first place.
'community' will roar against soulbind items. soulbind-for-n-hours change wil come soonish
Agreed. Would be lame if you cannot sell your 100 million worth item to other players when you found a better one. Sell it to a vendor for like 5000 is quite a difference lol.
'community' will roar against soulbind items. soulbind-for-n-hours change wil come soonish
unfortunately I don't see account bound for a limited time being a solution - for the TW market at least, since the main problem lies with commodities, especially gems.
Currently on the TW server, radiant stars are only about 2-3 mil, about the same price as flawless stars(!)
Onetwo did an amazing job with those screens. First time seeing it, and already sad that it isn't in the game. At this point Blizzard has not only dropped the ball, but they are currently chasing it down a flight of stairs and into oncoming traffic. For shaaaame
I think it would be great if they did update the main screen with something like Onetwo's work. From the get go, I didn't like the "feel" of the main screen (same with SC2). Feels too isloated.
Of course there are a lot of higher priorities that they should be working on before I can get into the game again! Here's hoping!
As stated before.... Sure it sucks that your items are account bound if you get your account restored. But it's better than having to start completely from scratch.
I guess there is only 2 environments in act 4, the gardens areas and the spire levels. Both are well done but I like the gardens area as it's a little brighter but still Diabloish
Those UI ideas look really polished and really well thought out... Great work OneTwo!
I hope Blizz takes these into consideration...
As for the items being bound... I like the work around buuut... humph, I reckon there could be another way...
Talking about nephalem valor, I think it's still too harsh to remove all 5 stacks for simply changing skills. This type of restriction doesn't promote "fun" play, because if I encounter a particular pack I can't beat, I can choose to either lose all my stacks by changing skills (not fun), skip the pack (not fun), or cut my losses and make a new game (also not fun). Removing a single stack of valor would make it so people are not changing skills randomly all the time, while not penalizing players to the point that changing skills once a 5 stack is reached becomes something that isn't even considered.
that should how battle.net lobby for D3 should look like but I doubt they will revise it, esp. that it's been almost half of the year w/out PVP.. they should have only sold this game for $30.. half the price coz no PVP
It would be extremely awesome the D3 layout looked like that, with the option to search for games the same as D2 did.
Those screenshots are very impressive for fan-made.
While I fully support the move to stop people benefiting from the rollback system to duplicate items, I'd rather it was more punitive. Not being able to profit from a deliberately offensive action does invalidate actually doing it, but I can't help but feel this is equivalent to "I botted for 200hr but don't worry, I didn't find any good loot". Can't say I can offer a better alternative though, so gg
I'm glad there's someone else who like to "photoshop" like me.
I made quite a few threads to write about ideas with the help of "self-created images" in the italian forum and I received a nice feedback from the italian community.
Anyway this is my first post and I logged-in only to say how amazing onetwo's work is.
It's great that there are people out there who can make Blizzard re-think their own games design.
Keep up the great work Onetwo!
P.S. I'm astonished that that thread was created in February.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Agreed. Would be lame if you cannot sell your 100 million worth item to other players when you found a better one. Sell it to a vendor for like 5000 is quite a difference lol.
unfortunately I don't see account bound for a limited time being a solution - for the TW market at least, since the main problem lies with commodities, especially gems.
Currently on the TW server, radiant stars are only about 2-3 mil, about the same price as flawless stars(!)
I think it would be great if they did update the main screen with something like Onetwo's work. From the get go, I didn't like the "feel" of the main screen (same with SC2). Feels too isloated.
Of course there are a lot of higher priorities that they should be working on before I can get into the game again! Here's hoping!
I guess there is only 2 environments in act 4, the gardens areas and the spire levels. Both are well done but I like the gardens area as it's a little brighter but still Diabloish
I hope Blizz takes these into consideration...
As for the items being bound... I like the work around buuut... humph, I reckon there could be another way...
Looking forward to release of HotS!
Those screenshots are very impressive for fan-made.
I made quite a few threads to write about ideas with the help of "self-created images" in the italian forum and I received a nice feedback from the italian community.
Anyway this is my first post and I logged-in only to say how amazing onetwo's work is.
It's great that there are people out there who can make Blizzard re-think their own games design.
Keep up the great work Onetwo!
P.S. I'm astonished that that thread was created in February.