I can't see the purpose of these topics: "what do we like" and "what we don't like". What difference does it make? As long as i know, Blizzard isn't searching for opinions.
I've thought the same thing so many times, but in the end it comes down to one question:
ya got something better to talk about on a forum for a game that basically nothing is known about yet?
Answer that and I will never have to post on these kind of threads again. In the end, there is nothing better. *sigh*:(
I can't see the purpose of these topics: "what do we like" and "what we don't like". What difference does it make? As long as i know, Blizzard isn't searching for opinions.
Um what? Bashiok already confirmed they read fan sites and b.net forums and bring good ideas and/or topics to blizzard designers. You tard.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
If you get personally attacked by letters through the internet its a good thing to always have a box of tissues and a band-aid around.
I can't see the purpose of these topics: "what do we like" and "what we don't like". What difference does it make? As long as i know, Blizzard isn't searching for opinions.
Lol I laugh at you uninformed idiot.
Like my counterpart above me, Bashiok already confirmed they do ACTUALLY read these sites. And I don't really understand why Blizzard would link this fan site if they weren't going to look over it once in a while.
ehh things i dont want back: iron maiden -.- we all know what im talking about and smite if its gonna be "hits every time" because thats just fuckin gay... like at least with hammers u can dodge them and u have to aim... traps always have chance to miss u if ur running around and stuff zeal requires points into dex to hit... etc... just hated smite... and thats basically it
I never liked Sorceresses, I'm more of a close quarter fighter, rather than a TELEPORT STRIKE TELEPORT STRIKE, and then act like I can own God kinda player. There's not much art in playing a sorceress. I only like a handful of 1-x spells, like Lightning Sentry. Lightning + Corpse explosion = orgasm.
I never liked Sorceresses, I'm more of a close quarter fighter, rather than a TELEPORT STRIKE TELEPORT STRIKE, and then act like I can own God kinda player. There's not much art in playing a sorceress. I only like a handful of 1-x spells, like Lightning Sentry. Lightning + Corpse explosion = orgasm.
Well the point of the 1-x skills is that they usually have higher ranges as well as lower. But the average usually comes out in the middle. So usually you'll get the average damage or around it and on occasion you'll get the higher or the lower.
Like my counterpart above me, Bashiok already confirmed they do ACTUALLY read these sites. And I don't really understand why Blizzard would link this fan site if they weren't going to look over it once in a while.
Uninformed fool is uninformed.
lol I laugh at you clueless idiot.
I laugh at you for beleiving the post of someone that makes a living keeping us interested in the game. /face
Well you also have a probability of a higher hit... it works itself out. :confused:
I just save myself the trouble and get one with a more fixed value to it. I told you, I only like a very few 1-x spells, like the Assassin's Sentry, where Corpse Explosion just makes it awesome.
I never liked Sorceresses, I'm more of a close quarter fighter, rather than a TELEPORT STRIKE TELEPORT STRIKE, and then act like I can own God kinda player. There's not much art in playing a sorceress.
Standing still and clicking a monster is smarter than teleporting around while shooting a monster? I wonder what the world is coming to.
I thought you criticized a skill, not the sorceress. You need to decide, you know. And nobody forces you to use teleport.
I just save myself the trouble and get one with a more fixed value to it. I told you, I only like a very few 1-x spells, like the Assassin's Sentry, where Corpse Explosion just makes it awesome.
I thought corpse explosion was a % of the monsters hp not a 1-x skill?
yeah, most people dont want FoH and Hammers because they got OWNED OFF THEIR A**
I personally just didn't like Blessed Hammer because of it's design. It's an attack that has to be used at a certain angle. I can't think of any other ability like that. There is absolutely nothing wrong with FOH. Though if you ask me it was strictly for PvP. They could improve it to better suit PvE. Maybe lower the damage but hit multiple targets?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
We are accomplices.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I've thought the same thing so many times, but in the end it comes down to one question:
ya got something better to talk about on a forum for a game that basically nothing is known about yet?
Answer that and I will never have to post on these kind of threads again. In the end, there is nothing better. *sigh*:(
Um what? Bashiok already confirmed they read fan sites and b.net forums and bring good ideas and/or topics to blizzard designers. You tard.
Lol I laugh at you uninformed idiot.
Like my counterpart above me, Bashiok already confirmed they do ACTUALLY read these sites. And I don't really understand why Blizzard would link this fan site if they weren't going to look over it once in a while.
Uninformed fool is uninformed.
gamma11 > east
I never liked Sorceresses, I'm more of a close quarter fighter, rather than a TELEPORT STRIKE TELEPORT STRIKE, and then act like I can own God kinda player. There's not much art in playing a sorceress. I only like a handful of 1-x spells, like Lightning Sentry. Lightning + Corpse explosion = orgasm.
Rise and rise again, until lambs become lions
Well the point of the 1-x skills is that they usually have higher ranges as well as lower. But the average usually comes out in the middle. So usually you'll get the average damage or around it and on occasion you'll get the higher or the lower.
Rise and rise again, until lambs become lions
Well you also have a probability of a higher hit... it works itself out. :confused:
lol I laugh at you clueless idiot.
I laugh at you for beleiving the post of someone that makes a living keeping us interested in the game. /face
I just save myself the trouble and get one with a more fixed value to it. I told you, I only like a very few 1-x spells, like the Assassin's Sentry, where Corpse Explosion just makes it awesome.
Rise and rise again, until lambs become lions
I thought you criticized a skill, not the sorceress. You need to decide, you know. And nobody forces you to use teleport.
I thought corpse explosion was a % of the monsters hp not a 1-x skill?
We are accomplices.
Ehhh ravens were pretty good, they blinded opponents as well as damaging them.
Telekinesis kocked back opponents as Pendragon said.
Hammers were kind of cheap but meh, if they're in the game I'll deal with it. I had no problem with FoH.
I personally just didn't like Blessed Hammer because of it's design. It's an attack that has to be used at a certain angle. I can't think of any other ability like that. There is absolutely nothing wrong with FOH. Though if you ask me it was strictly for PvP. They could improve it to better suit PvE. Maybe lower the damage but hit multiple targets?
We are accomplices.