So I read a post where blizzard said they actually feel ww is in a good place right now...lol
They say its aoe lets you move through mobs bla bla.
Dumbest thing ive read in awhile, they don't even know how to balance this game.
How is it for an "aoe" ability it does "great" area damage yet an ability like hota does "better" aoe damage and single target damage? The logic of which they write with baffles me and all they know how to do is drop the nerf hammer.
Do I really need to make a video where I can demonstrate just how bad ww is versus a hota build? I can literally prove to these monkeys how even on an aoe level hota crushes ww. How do we even voice our opinions to these monkeys? Maybe that's why blizzards so banana's, they appeal to all the kids who don't have a clue as to whats good and isn't.
I just need a build where I can actually use my hexing pants.....WW is the only way really.
The big debate? fix ww or bring back shard of hate
Too bad, maybe you could realize that you are missing something cruical when comparing ww and hota.
Bring back soh op proc? That would only make it so lightning ww is the only useful rune so seriously, that's not a fix.
[...] So basically lightning is the only useful rune because bis items are lightning procs. Blizzard are a bunch of monkeys lol.
[...]
WW is still a dumper and it should still be t6 viable, right now it is nowhere near t6 viable and its an awful skill yet a SIGNATURE skill. When you get Raekor fury isn't an issue and WW should be a choice over hota.
Okay, stay on topic or this thing gets locked up. Removed all the personal attacks stuff, totally unnecessary. If this discussion continues on a personal level this thread will be locked.
"If it requires no skill than why are there thousands of posts looking for guidance?"
Logical fallacy. Go check google trends for trivial stuff and behold the sad truth; People on the interwebz look for guidance in every single matter. Enough people with internet access to provide us with weird statistics.
"Why aren't you a top barb in the community"
Because i play all classes (or at least try to). And i don't spend that much time on gaming. Sure, i played a lot on release but i have to go to work and do other daily chores that prevent me from being able to compete with people who spend more than 10 hours a day, every single day.
"better yet you're so far above the skill cap why do you even post on the d3 forums?"
Never claimed to be far above the skill cap. I do think that i'm knowledgable to a certain degree when it comes to barb, wd, wiz and dh. I post on the forums because i got involved with the community a couple of years ago, and i developed a habbit of visitng the forums almost everyday.
"Go back to your low tier wow skills."
I've played wow vanilla when it first came out for the 1 month free period and then quit. So nope, i just don't play mmo's.
OT: you should provide a third option in the poll that says that ww is fine as it is. WW is not supposed to directly compete with hota in terms of raw damage whether it be a single target or aoe dps. The benefits that ww provide even out the playing field. I think that many spenders (not only barb skills) require some sort of a buff and that ww is not an exception. In relation to other skills in game, ww is in a fine spot imo.
Looks like they didn't even fix the Hexing pants bug with whirlwind. That would have at least made fire WW semi-viable in leapquake over hammer. Thanks for nothing Blizzard.
They say its aoe lets you move through mobs bla bla.
Dumbest thing ive read in awhile, they don't even know how to balance this game.
How is it for an "aoe" ability it does "great" area damage yet an ability like hota does "better" aoe damage and single target damage? The logic of which they write with baffles me and all they know how to do is drop the nerf hammer.
Do I really need to make a video where I can demonstrate just how bad ww is versus a hota build? I can literally prove to these monkeys how even on an aoe level hota crushes ww. How do we even voice our opinions to these monkeys? Maybe that's why blizzards so banana's, they appeal to all the kids who don't have a clue as to whats good and isn't.
I just need a build where I can actually use my hexing pants.....WW is the only way really.
The big debate? fix ww or bring back shard of hate
/discuss
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/barrybondz-1111/hero/17437659
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/barrybondz-1111/hero/17437659
Bring back soh op proc? That would only make it so lightning ww is the only useful rune so seriously, that's not a fix.
[...]
WW is still a dumper and it should still be t6 viable, right now it is nowhere near t6 viable and its an awful skill yet a SIGNATURE skill. When you get Raekor fury isn't an issue and WW should be a choice over hota.
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/barrybondz-1111/hero/17437659
Because i play all classes (or at least try to). And i don't spend that much time on gaming. Sure, i played a lot on release but i have to go to work and do other daily chores that prevent me from being able to compete with people who spend more than 10 hours a day, every single day.
Never claimed to be far above the skill cap. I do think that i'm knowledgable to a certain degree when it comes to barb, wd, wiz and dh. I post on the forums because i got involved with the community a couple of years ago, and i developed a habbit of visitng the forums almost everyday.
I've played wow vanilla when it first came out for the 1 month free period and then quit. So nope, i just don't play mmo's.
OT: you should provide a third option in the poll that says that ww is fine as it is. WW is not supposed to directly compete with hota in terms of raw damage whether it be a single target or aoe dps. The benefits that ww provide even out the playing field. I think that many spenders (not only barb skills) require some sort of a buff and that ww is not an exception. In relation to other skills in game, ww is in a fine spot imo.
sure i can't be as efficient as a leapquake barb with hota...but who cares. not every build is supposed to be super efficient.