Well they already have keyboards and mouse for game consoles so that isn't much of an issue... the only diffence is that you can see the game on a bigger screen, other then that it's exactly the same as the computer unless they completly change the format of the game...
Have had my Ps2 ever since they came out and it reads my games instantly, I also use it nearly everyday. The Ps2 that I have has an internal hardrive, the internet play is actually very good, all of the ps2 controllers that I've see are the same length as x-box controllers...but that doesn't matter to me, I use a wireless control( which work really well)
Bless you for being so true to the ps2. `sniff.` Makes me happy. :). Ps3 outta be very, very good from what I hear.
you dont type...its call headset, as for creating games...yea that would pose a problem....diablo will never come out on consoles...but if it did, i bet it would be cool.
That would be realy stupid if they make Diablo3 for PS3...they should leave it on PC only!
And i donit get how people will play it?! how can u play it without a mouse?!
I never liked PS1/2 or x-box.....because in some games the controles are so STUPID and FUCKED UP!
and if u play on the enternet it will take u so long to type someting....
PS1/2/3 SUCK and all the other console's.....
----SlipKNoT----
They do have keyboard attachments now for consoles, and mouse attachments to. So if they did come out with it on the new system, I don't think it'd be a problem.
Of the 3 lastest consoles...xbox is def the best Why?
Game cube has shitty games, shitty graphics, shitty controllers and a little kid design design.
PS2- fails to read games after about 2 months, no interal harddrive, shittiest internet play ever. Short controller cords.
Xbox plusses- Interal harddrive...still 50k+ :), awesome graphics, good games, excellant online system, system links, Halo 2.
Xbox negatives- Ugh...ugh....just outdated like the rest of them. oh...u gotta buy a dvd remote to watch dvds...but i suggest a real dvd player over any console system.
As for navigating....not a problem at all, if games liek fable, baldurs gate, morrowind have done it...dont see why diablo cant.
The new PS3 has its own processor now. Thus, solving that problems. And, I don't know what problems you've had with a ps2, but I have NEVER had a read disc error problem.
Ok, I have actually attempted to make a Hammerdin. At first I thought that it was a cool idea. 10k dmg? SURE!
So, I finally get to be able to use his Hammer, and what do I end up finding, that the hammer is not very reliable in hitting its target. I have almost died because of its inability to hit its target unless the target is in the spiraling path, but even then it doesn't happen.
I don't see why there is all the buzz about Hammerdin's I really don't. If you can make it work, great, for me, I'll just go with a Holy Shock/Zeal Pally.
Or maybe have each of the lesser evils control a part of hell, and thus you have a garanteed 7, yes, SEVEN! acts to go through, ontop of killing the 3 prime evils again, making for an astounding 10 ACTS! :O.
Well, Gamespy has a TBA Release date of 2k6 for Diablo 3, so if they are making it, they did a damn good job of keep it under wraps.
And also, Blizzard does not throw shitty junk together. Everyone who plays a blizzard game. They do high quality work and make sure that it does what is intended to do.
I really love the Diablo series and would love to see the next installment. The game made Blizzard and all of the fans deserve the game. But with much of the original designers gone, a cancelation might be the eventuality.
Really thinking about it, i would really rather have it canceled then blizzard throwing together some crap and charging for the online play. I love the series, but I have had other game series that are just crap compared to their original.
It wasn't only just Diablo that made Blizzard big. It was there other quality games. Anyone remember Warcraft 1 and the crappy graphics? It was still a fun, challenging game to play. Though Diablo was a huge seller, I'm jsut saying that it wasn't Diablo that made Blizzard famous.
You're all living in a dream world. Blizzard isn't going to make a special area just for dueling. They are just going to leave it out on the open field where bsing and teamups are gonna happen and there's nothing we can do about it.
1. Hundreds if not thousands of more items, uniques especially, sets, etc.
2. No immunities in hell....its not fair to sorcs.
3. More then 1 "good" build for each class.
4. Monsters like souls shouldnt be so powerful
5. More classes
6. More skill tabs (fire, cold, lightning, *magic*) for example.
7. A couple more Acts
8. Another item type "like runes" such as elements, as well as more gems and like 30-50 more runes and runewords.
9. pvp needs to be way different, ppl should drop 1 of their weilding items if u kill them.
Ill edit and add more as i think.
1: There are already hundreds, if not thousands of items in Diablo 2 and LoD combined. I could see them possibly revamping a lot of them, maybe even making some new ones, but to do a full out complete new list would probably not a good idea, but then again, it would add some mystery as to what would be the best items and such.
2: Immunities in hell. This presented an interesting challenge to all classes. I actually like the immunities bit as it gives Hell that difficulty edge where Nightmare did not. Sorc's weren't the only ones that felt the sting. Necro's Skel mages felt the sting too. I'd say leave it in and leave the challenge.
3: 1 Good build? Your kidding me right? There are about 2 good builds to each class, with a possible 3 for a few. It's all in how you build them. Skill and strategic planning is the key.
4: I haven't ran into any "Souls of" Monsters, but if they are poweful, its to provide a challenge. Everyone knows that in Normal and Nightmare, once you got to a certain point, the lvl wasn't challenging anymore and thus is was far to easy to just walk around, wacking everything with one shot. More powerful monsters=more power items=more challenges=more fun.
5: I agree with you here. I think they should add in a couple more classes. I had heard rumors of Diablo 2 having an Angel and Demon type classes, but they ended up being false. Something else to add on here would be Sex selection. After you pick your class, pick which sex you wanted to be. I'm sure a lot of males found it annoying to play a sorc or an assassin as a female. Not that I am discriminating against females, I'm just saying let there be a choice between the two.
6: Personally, I think 3 skill tabs is enough. You only have so many skill points to spread around. If you give a person too many options, they end up spreading themselves too thin that they won't be effective enough. I could possibly see one extra skill tab, but I don't think it's going to happen. Although a magic tab would be interesting.(I'm starting to think you play a sorc.)
7: Diablo 2 and LoD presented us with a total of 5 acts. Thats pretty big if you ask me. Though, I think for a couple they could have been longer or better done(Act 3 is a really good example, since its THE most confusing act of the game.) I do like the quests where you get to add things like the imbue, socket and Personalize quests. Those were a good idea, along with the skill quests. I would say, add on a couple more quests to each act and that should suffice, unless you want to have a 4-5 disc game(Balder's Gate anyone?).
8: This probably goes along with my reply to the first one. Not really too sure what else to say on this other than if they did come out with new ones, it would add more mystery. More rune words would definately be a neat idea.
9: I disagree with this. Why? Because of the pking that goes on. Unless they developed a system of a duel question popping up where both agree, having your opponent drop a weilding weapon is a horrible idea. You finally get that one weapon you've been striving for and all of a sudden you get bs'd by someone more powerful than you, he kills you and takes your weapon. Now your weapon is lost and you have a bad taste in your mouth, and possibly may quit the game. Thats not very far is it? The way they have the duels is good enough unless they improve on the pk aspect and attempt to stop it, though highly undoable.
0
Bless you for being so true to the ps2. `sniff.` Makes me happy. :). Ps3 outta be very, very good from what I hear.
0
You must have missed Diablo 1 on the ps1.
0
They do have keyboard attachments now for consoles, and mouse attachments to. So if they did come out with it on the new system, I don't think it'd be a problem.
0
The new PS3 has its own processor now. Thus, solving that problems. And, I don't know what problems you've had with a ps2, but I have NEVER had a read disc error problem.
0
So, I finally get to be able to use his Hammer, and what do I end up finding, that the hammer is not very reliable in hitting its target. I have almost died because of its inability to hit its target unless the target is in the spiraling path, but even then it doesn't happen.
I don't see why there is all the buzz about Hammerdin's I really don't. If you can make it work, great, for me, I'll just go with a Holy Shock/Zeal Pally.
0
0
0
And also, Blizzard does not throw shitty junk together. Everyone who plays a blizzard game. They do high quality work and make sure that it does what is intended to do.
0
It wasn't only just Diablo that made Blizzard big. It was there other quality games. Anyone remember Warcraft 1 and the crappy graphics? It was still a fun, challenging game to play. Though Diablo was a huge seller, I'm jsut saying that it wasn't Diablo that made Blizzard famous.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1: There are already hundreds, if not thousands of items in Diablo 2 and LoD combined. I could see them possibly revamping a lot of them, maybe even making some new ones, but to do a full out complete new list would probably not a good idea, but then again, it would add some mystery as to what would be the best items and such.
2: Immunities in hell. This presented an interesting challenge to all classes. I actually like the immunities bit as it gives Hell that difficulty edge where Nightmare did not. Sorc's weren't the only ones that felt the sting. Necro's Skel mages felt the sting too. I'd say leave it in and leave the challenge.
3: 1 Good build? Your kidding me right? There are about 2 good builds to each class, with a possible 3 for a few. It's all in how you build them. Skill and strategic planning is the key.
4: I haven't ran into any "Souls of" Monsters, but if they are poweful, its to provide a challenge. Everyone knows that in Normal and Nightmare, once you got to a certain point, the lvl wasn't challenging anymore and thus is was far to easy to just walk around, wacking everything with one shot. More powerful monsters=more power items=more challenges=more fun.
5: I agree with you here. I think they should add in a couple more classes. I had heard rumors of Diablo 2 having an Angel and Demon type classes, but they ended up being false. Something else to add on here would be Sex selection. After you pick your class, pick which sex you wanted to be. I'm sure a lot of males found it annoying to play a sorc or an assassin as a female. Not that I am discriminating against females, I'm just saying let there be a choice between the two.
6: Personally, I think 3 skill tabs is enough. You only have so many skill points to spread around. If you give a person too many options, they end up spreading themselves too thin that they won't be effective enough. I could possibly see one extra skill tab, but I don't think it's going to happen. Although a magic tab would be interesting.(I'm starting to think you play a sorc.)
7: Diablo 2 and LoD presented us with a total of 5 acts. Thats pretty big if you ask me. Though, I think for a couple they could have been longer or better done(Act 3 is a really good example, since its THE most confusing act of the game.) I do like the quests where you get to add things like the imbue, socket and Personalize quests. Those were a good idea, along with the skill quests. I would say, add on a couple more quests to each act and that should suffice, unless you want to have a 4-5 disc game(Balder's Gate anyone?).
8: This probably goes along with my reply to the first one. Not really too sure what else to say on this other than if they did come out with new ones, it would add more mystery. More rune words would definately be a neat idea.
9: I disagree with this. Why? Because of the pking that goes on. Unless they developed a system of a duel question popping up where both agree, having your opponent drop a weilding weapon is a horrible idea. You finally get that one weapon you've been striving for and all of a sudden you get bs'd by someone more powerful than you, he kills you and takes your weapon. Now your weapon is lost and you have a bad taste in your mouth, and possibly may quit the game. Thats not very far is it? The way they have the duels is good enough unless they improve on the pk aspect and attempt to stop it, though highly undoable.
Well, thats my repsonse to this post. Enjoy.