Rather than limit where you can put Gems, why not just limit the total number of Leg Gems you can have in your gear? With the way it looks currently you could have a max of 3. So why not just have a max of 3 across your entire set of gear? This would negate the need to ruin good rings and amulets just to get a socket for a Leg Gem.
The cost to unsocket could be a hefty gold sink to make you consider what you use them on. So say you get your first Leg Gem that is just ok, then you get a really nice one - you do not have to get a whole new item to place it in.
I think the benefit of using them in any socket is - it adds flexibility to your gear. It will still comes at a cost no matter where you put them. I suppose a question is are these new Leg Gems going to be something that is actually worth dumping Ele %, Crit %, Crit DMG or ATK Speed for (especially in the Rings and Amulets as it is right now)?
The cost to unsocket could be a hefty gold sink evento make you consider what you use them on. So say you get your first Leg Gem that is just ok, then you get a really nice one - you do not have to get a whole new item to place it in.
I think the benifit of using them in any socket is - it adds flexibility to your gear. It will still comes at a cost no matter where you put them. I suppose a question is are these new Leg Gems going to be something that is actually worth dumping Ele %, Crit %, Crit DMG or ATK Speed for (especially in the Rings and Amulets as it is right now)?
Rather than limit where you can put Gems, why not just limit the total number of Leg Gems you can have in your gear? With the way it looks currently you could have a max of 3. So why not just have a max of 3 across your entire set of gear? This would negate the need to ruin good rings and amulets just to get a socket for a Leg Gem.
0
Rather than limit where you can put Gems, why not just limit the total number of Leg Gems you can have in your gear? With the way it looks currently you could have a max of 3. So why not just have a max of 3 across your entire set of gear? This would negate the need to ruin good rings and amulets just to get a socket for a Leg Gem.
The cost to unsocket could be a hefty gold sink to make you consider what you use them on. So say you get your first Leg Gem that is just ok, then you get a really nice one - you do not have to get a whole new item to place it in.
I think the benefit of using them in any socket is - it adds flexibility to your gear. It will still comes at a cost no matter where you put them. I suppose a question is are these new Leg Gems going to be something that is actually worth dumping Ele %, Crit %, Crit DMG or ATK Speed for (especially in the Rings and Amulets as it is right now)?
0
I think the benifit of using them in any socket is - it adds flexibility to your gear. It will still comes at a cost no matter where you put them. I suppose a question is are these new Leg Gems going to be something that is actually worth dumping Ele %, Crit %, Crit DMG or ATK Speed for (especially in the Rings and Amulets as it is right now)?
0
This is actually my first post.
Rather than limit where you can put Gems, why not just limit the total number of Leg Gems you can have in your gear? With the way it looks currently you could have a max of 3. So why not just have a max of 3 across your entire set of gear? This would negate the need to ruin good rings and amulets just to get a socket for a Leg Gem.
Just a thought...