Found this on a forum:
As we inch nearer to Blizzard's mega-announcement in Korea, we have oh-so-little more to go on regarding the reveal. We still don't know what's coming -- even though you've told us it better be StarCraft 2, so here's hoping -- but Blizzard's itinerary for the day reveals a "Medusa Demo" following the announcement.
Sounds like one of the games may in fact be a new IP.
- Blazur
- Registered User
-
Member for 17 years
Last active Mon, Aug, 20 2012 09:34:09
- 0 Followers
- 226 Total Posts
- 8 Thanks
-
May 18, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "Why-E" »Starcraft 2: Make what you want out of it. :confused:
Nah, that's a mod for C&C. There's also a mod for WC3 designed to depict SC in a 3-d perspective. It's not official footage of SC2. -
May 18, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Man this suspense is killing me...I wish somebody would leak some official details soon! I really hope we don't have to wait until 3am tomorrow to find out.Posted in: News
I really think you guys are reading too much into the patern of game announcements. If anything the words may lead to some sort of clue, but analyzing the order of the games seems like folly because it's not like that's gonna influence their next game. If anything, you should look at what universe has received the least attention. -
May 17, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "NeciFiX" »KOREANATTACK2007!
OMG Korean rush kekeke! -
May 17, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Oh and another thing. Many people are claiming that even after the announcement is made we've still got another 1-3 years before the game gets released. However, I think we might actually see it this year.Posted in: News
Many rumors are claiming the same saying we might have a SC2 beta by end of 2007. But based on these timeline graphics I think that's plausiable. They're attaching a year to each game, and ultimately the final year is gonna say 2007, leading us to believe that it might actually be finished or in a playable state in 2007. Unless of course the final image to be revealed shows the game with a 2008 or 2009 timestamp. -
May 17, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "meuhey" »i guess they gonna uptade the website at midnight pacifik time
Something tells me they won't, so don't be disappointed if the new image doesn't appear at the strike of midnight. I have a sneaking suspicion they're gonna hold the suspense as long as possible to coincide with the announcement in Korea. :mad: -
May 17, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "KoreanSky" »Who's going to countdown and stay up till midnight tomorrow?
My goal Fri night is to continue painting my house during the day, and when the sun sets I'm gonna commence drinking beer and playing SC until I pass out. If I can't make it to 3am hopefully I'll have a nice suprise waiting for me when I wake up. It'll be like Christmas! -
May 16, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "whiteghost21" »It may might just be me, but does the pic. of diablo in the background seem slightly clearer on this day's background then the background for Diablo 1
Nah, they're the same:
Diablo 2
Diablo 1
Looks like they've added an image map to the timeline allowing you to revisit previous days. -
May 16, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!If they are in fact updating the graphic at 3am EST, I'm curious if they'll do the same on Sat. morning, or if they'll coincide it with the actual announcement at WWI? Hopefully we don't have to wait too long!Posted in: News
-
May 16, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "Jetrall" »Lol. Cain = God. Now that would be a twist!
In many stories between God and the devil God cannot directly intervene with the lives of humans but can influence them. Imagine if that were the case with D3? He represents himself as a kind elderly man who's knowledgeable about the devil and all his cohorts, and also motives and assists those in their plight to destroy evil. It just might work! -
May 16, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Posted in: NewsQuote from "Jetrall" »But why use Cain twice? They could have used ANY other Diablo character's words, but they used Cain both times.
Meh, Cain is really the only character that exists in both games (and isn't corrupted). He also plays an important role and is probably the most memorable.
It's been said that D3 will have the battle brought to the gates of heaven. I've always thought it would be cool if Cain's true identity is revealed as being an angel or seraphim in disguise. He seems to fit the profile... -
May 16, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!They should've used this as the main graphic or background for D2. I've always thought this was cooler and more dark than any of the wallpapers or images Blizz created.Posted in: News
-
May 16, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Cain always sounded like Sean Connery to me.Posted in: News
-
May 15, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!Okay, they just released SC patch 1.15 which basically does nothing except add league creation. Seems all too conincidental. Is it possible they're implementing the patch right before announcing SC2 to get some metrics on who still plays the game, and how that number might be influenced by the potential of a sequel?Posted in: News
Oh and get a life goodguy8705. Are you so lonely that you have to troll on other forums to insult others and challenge them to a private pissing contest? And by the way, being a prick does nothing to exemplify intelligence. Only impression I get is you're a frustrated teen that's never been laid and looking to take it out on someone... -
May 15, 2007Blazur posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!I can't wait to see what graphic they'll put on the main Blizz website to the left side. It's been WoW crap for who knows how long!Posted in: News
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
So you actually prefer a game that has less skillfull play in favor of simple gear checks? You're likely in the target audience Blizz has catered this game to...those who will willingly buy an equipment loadout for $300 on the AH because they've accepted that's their only chance at success in D3.
0
I don't agree with their "By Design" reasoning, and despite their claims would enjoy this game infinitely more if I could dodge attacks with reflexes and quick fingers. Being forced to stand in harms way because it's impossible to avoid damage is not my idea of fun. That philosophy removes much of the challenge and enjoyment in playing the game.
0
I hear ya. On countless occasions I've tried to escape attacks using vault, leap and furious charge...only to have my body reduced to bones when the escape animation completed because the monster attacked my previous position. We need clairvoyance to dodge attacks since you cannot rely on visual clues. When a monster begins its attack animations you're already hit.
7
This thread is a compilation of videos and photo evidence demonstrating how broken the hit detection is in D3. According to Blizzard this is intended design to prevent dodging, as they deem it not fun for players and not part of their design philosophy. Evidence here: http://us.battle.net...c/4427663050#15
Blizz, I implore you to give this attention because it's frustrating and I believe a fundamental flaw that's preventing many from enjoying your game. Hardcore is suicide because hit detection is unpredictable. Inferno is pointless because you get 1-shot and cannot effectively avoid taking hits. If this persists in PvP it'll enrage players.
- http://www.diablo3pr...hardcore-death/
- http://imgur.com/a/puNOU#1
- http://www.reddit.co.../comments/v1fwn
- http://imgur.com/a/crN39#0
I want to be able to dodge attacks and missiles. I want to test my reflexes. I want to feel like I'm in control of my characters survivability. And more importantly...I want to keep playing this game. But this issue is really making me question why I'm investing time into D3.
Until this issue is resolved I can no longer look at D3 in a positive light . There's a lot of bugs in D3 which can be excused. This one, I feel, is game breaking.
0
0
0
0
Edit: I haven't seen all entries but am expecting much redundancy to Thriller due to the obvious reference.
0
0
0
0
Never played Mythos but it looks boring.
0
0
0