To be honest, we've only seen two characters, and the female barbarian dosn't look old at all. Plus, if you look at Diablo lore, the Necromancer is D2 was actually 200 years old I think. ( By magic, but still, old )
Until we've seen the other three classes we can't judge the age of all of them.
You know it's funny; I remember reading what that one blizz rep. wrote about the character classes they were making for Diablo III. I remember reading about how they "Didn't want to do a cross-over of any characters from the Diablo II franchise, and that all the characters for Diablo III were going to be unique and brand new for the game."
Yet, one of the first characters they introduced was the Barbarian. I'm not complaining, the Barbarian is an awesome class and a great character when thinking about hack'n'slash and all-out-melee, but I just thought it was kind of funny for them saying that, but the one class DID make a cross-over. It makes me wonder if they won't do the same for other unique classes like an updated Paladin or Druid character.
If they meant 'new', did they just mean the fact that they gave the class more unique abilities and powers? If so, that opens the door for any other character classes they plan on releasing in the future.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Until we've seen the other three classes we can't judge the age of all of them.
Yet, one of the first characters they introduced was the Barbarian. I'm not complaining, the Barbarian is an awesome class and a great character when thinking about hack'n'slash and all-out-melee, but I just thought it was kind of funny for them saying that, but the one class DID make a cross-over. It makes me wonder if they won't do the same for other unique classes like an updated Paladin or Druid character.
If they meant 'new', did they just mean the fact that they gave the class more unique abilities and powers? If so, that opens the door for any other character classes they plan on releasing in the future.