I have already suggested this, but i suppose it couldnt hurt to have others thinking this also.
i feel out of place, just about everyone in the thread, save me have one of those sigs, while i agree with it i dont feel like changing my sig (or avatar if avys are made too)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
Both serious are good, one or two similarities but we arent here to discuss that (maybe another thread prehaps).
been a fan of both, always have always will till the day i die, then ill still be a fan in the afterlife.
and yeh keep the sigs coming. maybe you could wrangle up a few avatars as well.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
-Diablo released in December 1996, 10 years on is, December 2006, passed that date, so that one is out
-Diablo II released in June 2000, so 10 years on is, June 2010, sounds good, hopefully its no further than that.
but if it doesn't comeout til 2010 i'll be able to stay busy with Lich King and SC2 until then... just like everyone else
definitely SCII for me, not a big fan of WOW, me.
My only problem with this one is I've always thought that to be the Balrog from LOTR. And Diablo is too good for LOTR.
or a Baalor from DND
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
I don't know about you guys, but if it is as late as 2010, I'm sure Starcraf II will provide me with lots of entertainment until then.
indeed, i look forward to getting my hands on this game, and D3 of course.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
personally i hope it wont be that long, but then again this is blizzard, we will probably get an annoucement in '08 and the game in 2010 /tear.
Ill still be here, assuming the site is still up at that time.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I have already suggested this, but i suppose it couldnt hurt to have others thinking this also.
i feel out of place, just about everyone in the thread, save me have one of those sigs, while i agree with it i dont feel like changing my sig (or avatar if avys are made too)
been a fan of both, always have always will till the day i die, then ill still be a fan in the afterlife.
and yeh keep the sigs coming. maybe you could wrangle up a few avatars as well.
-Diablo II released in June 2000, so 10 years on is, June 2010, sounds good, hopefully its no further than that.
definitely SCII for me, not a big fan of WOW, me.
or a Baalor from DND
indeed, i look forward to getting my hands on this game, and D3 of course.
Ill still be here, assuming the site is still up at that time.