for me Neverwinter Nights is the closet one that keeps the integraty of the games demiton and obeonts the other may have some neet images but they do not resibale the game as much. - as far as I know of the game basted of one screen shot.
Elder Scroll IV: Oblivion is eye candiy but it is a defrent kind of game it has simalerity but it would not be diablo if it was 1st person.
The vote for " Graphics similar to Diablo II" is not a annser. we all wont it to look like Diablo. I think in the end the devlipers will do like they did with d1 to d2 add some 3d but not go hoge wild and change the game. The devlipers will be garded in feer of scaring off Diablo fands if they chage it to much and with out soles Diablo dies.
Well if you are right I for one will not play the game. For me diablo is not a game about graphics its about the game. if one add to a sh*t load of exstra graphics that take up gigs of space the game suffers. I rather the room on te DVD be givin to new options and abilaty than how some thing looks.
The reson games like pong and tetris lasted so long is not be cose of the graphics it was for the game its self. Graphics are a destraction used to hide as guns are in movies when a movie has no plot.
Well, let me explain. There happens to be a game called Diablo. Which was a very good game. So they (Blizzard) made Diablo 2. Which was also very good. And this place/site is waiting for them to make a Diablo 3. Which will hopefully, also be very good.
Well if you are right I for one will not play the game. For me diablo is not a game about graphics its about the game. if one add to a sh*t load of exstra graphics that take up gigs of space the game suffers. I rather the room on te DVD be givin to new options and abilaty than how some thing looks.
Well, personally, I would rather have good graphics, but not to the point where they take away gameplay to implement graphics. Nor take away graphics to implement gameplay. Gameplay comes first, graphics come second, but they should have a balance. Sells better that way, to, making Blizzard more likely to continue the franchise.
Elder Scroll IV: Oblivion is eye candiy but it is a defrent kind of game it has simalerity but it would not be diablo if it was 1st person.
The vote for " Graphics similar to Diablo II" is not a annser. we all wont it to look like Diablo. I think in the end the devlipers will do like they did with d1 to d2 add some 3d but not go hoge wild and change the game. The devlipers will be garded in feer of scaring off Diablo fands if they chage it to much and with out soles Diablo dies.
Yes, I can help you.
Well, I first suggest that you get your facts straight...and that's about ti.
I don't have to like it...
The reson games like pong and tetris lasted so long is not be cose of the graphics it was for the game its self. Graphics are a destraction used to hide as guns are in movies when a movie has no plot.
To ewm90
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Well, let me explain. There happens to be a game called Diablo. Which was a very good game. So they (Blizzard) made Diablo 2. Which was also very good. And this place/site is waiting for them to make a Diablo 3. Which will hopefully, also be very good.
I hope that's clear enough for you...
Well, personally, I would rather have good graphics, but not to the point where they take away gameplay to implement graphics. Nor take away graphics to implement gameplay. Gameplay comes first, graphics come second, but they should have a balance. Sells better that way, to, making Blizzard more likely to continue the franchise.
Always and forever.
I hope......