• 2

    posted a message on ‘Diablo 2 Remaster and Diablo 4 will be announced at Blizzcon’

    I want both of these games. I'm afraid to hope for anything so I'll wait til Blizzcon and believe it when I see it.

    Posted in: Diablo IV: Return to Darkness
  • 1

    posted a message on Blizzard President about Diablo Immortal: “we’re happy with how it’s coming along”

    They should have announced their progress on their other diablo titles instead of expecting people to eat their shit and love it for diablo immortal.


    I honestly assumed they weren't going to make this game anymore since I haven't heard a peep since it was announced.

    Posted in: Diablo: Immortal
  • 1

    posted a message on Barbarian's Tattoos

    The blue warpaint is very reminiscent of scottish warpaint (famously seen in the move Braveheart) but seems like that block color style was used more for the D3 Barbarian, rather than D2. The D2 Barb looks like he is wearing something closer to viking or norse paint/tattoos. Since it might be difficult to recreate exactly what you are looking for, a nice compromise might be an enlarged rune tattooed on your forearm in blue. Then it will be recognizably Diablo, and also have that Barbarian blue warpaint style you are looking for.


    Posted in: Fan Art
  • 2

    posted a message on Future diablo 4 Ideas. what do you think

    Diablo at its core has always been an ARPG dungeon crawler with heavy emphasis on item hunt. It would be a risk to deviate from that original model, but the culture surrounding those kinds of games has changed. I'm hoping to see a nice heavy ARPG element with that item hunt still present, but I really want set items and legendaries to change, I want runestones, and more build customization, I want to explore more zones and meet new characters and get good character development, and I want a creepier atmosphere.


    Act V Reaper of Souls was heads and tails above the vanilla game in terms of characters, exploration, writing, and spookiness, and even the new zones were really interesting and creepy. It felt more like an M rated game. I want more time to explore and flesh out zones with things to do (questing perhaps?) I don't want an MMO, but I'd like a similar kind of experience, only with single player. I guess a bit like the Witcher, tho that would lose the top-down look of a dungeon crawler.


    I'd love to see less quest driven dialogue that beats us over the head with telling us where to go so much that we could go through the motions asleep. Having to think for even 5 seconds about where we are, what we're looking for, and where we should be going would be an improvement. Diablo 2 never had a blinking yellow circle on the minimap telling you exactly where you needed to go. D3 was a little too linear with leading you through campaign by the nose. Also bosses were always too easy, normal mode was too easy. I think there was too much emphasis on making the game too accessible for new players. People aren't stupid, they can learn new things without it being dumbed down.


    I'd be incredibly disappointed if the nephalem became an evil character, and I'd also be incredibly disappointed if everything was retconned. I LIKE the characters, I LIKE my characters, and I want them to do well. Making us choose between good and evil sounds lame tbh, because it's always been a game about maintaining the balance and fighting the minions of Hell. I don't want the characters I've grown to like to be forgotten, I just want them to be written better. I want the game to get a great lore treatment like so many of the diablo novels did.


    This got a little long lol, but I'm very passionate about the characters and world, and I want to see more of it, and to see it handled well.


    Edit: I personally don't much care for PVP, but I want it to be added to the game because I know a lot of people missed that. Also I think D3 still has a lot of cool end-game content that should stay, but some that needs heavy revision.

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on The Future of Diablo

    Quotes and direct reply don't seem to be working for me BUT-


    I haven't played D2 in at least a year, so I see how some hints would be easy to miss, but I'm hesitant to be 100% sure about anything.


    I like a lot of the possibilities brought up here: I'd love a D2 HD release, and I'd love an open world type of game, the only thing I want is for D3 to tie up its loose ends, which will hopefully be done with a DLC.


    I'm cautiously optimistic, because we've been burned at every blizzcon since Reaper of Souls and Necro, but very hopeful that this time they're actually serious with some announcements lol.

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Diablo 3 Valentines

    [deleted post]

    Posted in: Fan Art
  • 1

    posted a message on Diablo 4000

    I think there are already scifi games that approach this territory (Doom, etc), and it's weird to mix genres like this. The only thing that really changes is the setting and technology, so it seems like you just don't like the medieval setting, which is kind of integral to the game concept.

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Necro DLC for $21.95!?!
    Quote from Mr29cM»

    I would like to get the Necromancer class but $21.95 (Australian Dollars) is too much for a single character and some cosmetic add ons.

    Then d-d-d-d-d-don't buy it
    Posted in: Necromancer
  • 1

    posted a message on Reaction to Diablo III: Rise of the Necromancer

    I'm honestly really excited about the Necromancer coming back, that class is really fun and I expect they'll put a new and interesting spin on them as they've done with the D3 versions of other original classes. I'm excited about the dialogue we'll listen to with followers and story and I'm looking forward to the Necro's release! The Tristram event looks really fun and I can't wait to check it out!


    That said, what I really wanted was an expansion announcement which we didn't get, but I'm looking forward to hearing what'll be in store for us tomorrow. I'm hoping, with the Necromancer apparently being a paid addition, that this will start a trickle of new content and story DLC. I want an expansion, but getting it in pieces is fine with me too, as long as they actually DO this.


    I love this game, I haven't lost hope, and I'm gonna keep playing.

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Am I the only one for whom the introduction of ancient items basically ruins the game?
    I do not think it ruins the game, but I do think it was a poor idea.

    Devs claim that Ancient items were for players that already have the best gear and that it's supposed to take them to the next level, yet ancient items can be found as early as torment I. I think in order for this philosophy to work they should be T6 only. What better way to prolong the item hunt then to make the very best items at the end of line when you've already done some major hunting? If you get lucky in earlier Torments it shortens the hunt significantly.

    Most legendaries are thrown away unless they fall under the handful of BiS items for each class. Instead of ancient items, I'd rather see itemization repaired so that 99% of them aren't useless.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.