Of course it doesn't say it in our current King James bullcrap bible, but if you look at accurate translations of the oldest Bibles, and you can make an accurate estimation of there ages. (Just like telling that Jesus was in no way born during December, or in Winter at all.)
Before I talk, I want to say that I'm not being sexist.
The man is usually the more dominant figre in nature, except for spiders and other animals I can't remember. And age is a huge factor in dominance, as you are usually stronger, wiser, and tougher. Yes, there are SOME cultures that are female dominated, but for the most part, it is the older man who marries and has sex with the younger woman.
Are you trying to say that it is normal for 13 year old boys, who still don't have the maturity of raising and supporting a child, to get 15 year old girls pregnant?
The biological limit is there for old evolutionary times where the most important thing was reproduction and raising a kid didn't really consist of more than feeding them and teaching them wildlife survival.
Now we have to bother with houses and education and technology and humongous amounts of stuff, and it's been pretty much proven that people before 18 (make it 25) do not mentally mature fast enough to be ready to go out there. Anyone can knock someone up, we see proof of that all over the place. Now try not making that kid a mentally unstable outcast. This is the price we pay for civilization.
Before I talk, I want to say that I'm not being sexist.
The man is usually the more dominant figre in nature, except for spiders and other animals I can't remember. And age is a huge factor in dominance, as you are usually stronger, wiser, and tougher. Yes, there are SOME cultures that are female dominated, but for the most part, it is the older man who marries and has sex with the younger woman.
actually no, the female is often the dominant figure in nature. the female reproductive structure is often much larger than the males.
and wow, that girl is dirrrty.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Remember the String of Ears
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."
actually no, the female is often the dominant figure in nature. the female reproductive structure is often much larger than the males.
and wow, that girl is dirrrty.
This made me lol because I couldn't follow the logic...I had no idea that reproductive structure size defined dominance with women too!
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"I want to say something but I'll keep it to myself I guess and leave this useless post behind to make you aware that there WAS something... "
-Equinox
"We're like the downtown of the Diablo related internet lol"
-Winged
This made me lol because I couldn't follow the logic...I had no idea that reproductive structure size defined dominance with women too!
then you havent taken any biology courses have you? if you have huge ovaries and youre a small animal, take a grasshopper, then your going to be bigger than your male counterpart. this is usually common within most of the kingdom animalia and plantae.
but i wouldnt use 'dominant' (frick, i did didnt i? lol...) but you know what i mean, the females are bigger. (although being more dominant is also there )
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Remember the String of Ears
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."
Funny how if a guy did it, nobody would even notice.
Gotta love that Lozers comic on double standards...
the fact that she had multiple sex partners at the same time doesnt qualify as dirty? and if a guy did it im sure someone would notice. but then again, men dont get pregnant.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Remember the String of Ears
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."
the fact that she had multiple sex partners at the same time doesnt qualify as dirty?
Well, let's define:
does any person that has multiple sex partners at the same time qualifies as "dirty"?
Quote from "applesoffury" »
and if a guy did it im sure someone would notice. but then again, men dont get pregnant.
Watch any teenage movie or any movie about hormonal guys and usually, a guy can have active sex with tons of people and nobody really cares (in fact, it's supported, sorta), but when a girl sleeps with the football team, she's a slut. Again, going back to the Lozers comic.
Yes, guys don't get pregnant, which is why it's harder to point at guys since you can't prove anything.
Well, let's define:
does any person that has multiple sex partners at the same time qualifies as "dirty"?
Watch any teenage movie or any movie about hormonal guys and usually, a guy can have active sex with tons of people and nobody really cares (in fact, it's supported, sorta), but when a girl sleeps with the football team, she's a slut. Again, going back to the Lozers comic.
Yes, guys don't get pregnant, which is why it's harder to point at guys since you can't prove anything.
true, but then again thats hollywood, and when have they ever been 100% truthful let alone 50%...
its probably my use of slang thats got you all confuzzled right?
heres a question: would you let your daughter sleep around at that age?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Remember the String of Ears
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."
I have no control over what my daughter does at any age. So I dunno what you mean by "let". If she can actually go outside and is willing to sleep around, there is either a mentality problem (my fault) or an environmental problem (nothing I can do). This applies equally to both guys and girls. I don't understand why would anyone be more willing to let their son sleep around. One thing I'm not going to do is hang over them, not letting them out of the house and monitoring their internet surfing.
And yes, it was commonplace.
I was reffering to this...
It seems very strange to many of you, but really, it is not that uncommon.
Now if the girl were say 55 years old... I might agree with the statement that this whole thing was strange.
The man is usually the more dominant figre in nature, except for spiders and other animals I can't remember. And age is a huge factor in dominance, as you are usually stronger, wiser, and tougher. Yes, there are SOME cultures that are female dominated, but for the most part, it is the older man who marries and has sex with the younger woman.
Now we have to bother with houses and education and technology and humongous amounts of stuff, and it's been pretty much proven that people before 18 (make it 25) do not mentally mature fast enough to be ready to go out there. Anyone can knock someone up, we see proof of that all over the place. Now try not making that kid a mentally unstable outcast. This is the price we pay for civilization.
Who and why brought this up?
I joke.
I am so glad I only know you by your avatar.
And to everyone, there's a reason why boys mature later than girls.
and wow, that girl is dirrrty.
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."
This made me lol because I couldn't follow the logic...I had no idea that reproductive structure size defined dominance with women too!
-Equinox
"We're like the downtown of the Diablo related internet lol"
-Winged
but i wouldnt use 'dominant' (frick, i did didnt i? lol...) but you know what i mean, the females are bigger. (although being more dominant is also there )
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."
Gotta love that Lozers comic on double standards...
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."
does any person that has multiple sex partners at the same time qualifies as "dirty"?
Watch any teenage movie or any movie about hormonal guys and usually, a guy can have active sex with tons of people and nobody really cares (in fact, it's supported, sorta), but when a girl sleeps with the football team, she's a slut. Again, going back to the Lozers comic.
Yes, guys don't get pregnant, which is why it's harder to point at guys since you can't prove anything.
its probably my use of slang thats got you all confuzzled right?
heres a question: would you let your daughter sleep around at that age?
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."