just one thought, how could you blame the american deficit or any other worldy econimic problem on abortion, even if 40 million more babies had been born what would push you to think that THOSE children were better then previous generations. What would make THOSE children capable of curing desease or creating 40 million jobs and paying 40 million poeples worth of taxes, the truth is that point is invalid becuase there would just be 40 mil more homeless, or 40 mil more high school drop outs, or 40 mil more serial killers. there is NO information that states those aborted children would make it something big in this world that no one before them could.
There is also NO information to say that they would all be homeless/drop-outs, or that even a majority percentage of them would.
abortion is gross to think about for everybody, so we avoid it, but it is necisary, because you can't stop people from having unprotected sex, and having more than 2 children is very irresponsible. Also, you can't have regulations on it, because having a baby is a huge thing, so huge that people would just lie to get around it. Also, people don't want you snooping around their business, even if it is supposedly a good thing.
EXCUSE ME! My parents had 4 children, of which I am the second! Are you saying that it was IRRESPONSIBLE for them to have 4 children that they have been FULLY ABLE to support and raise?! That, sir, is complete ignorance, unsupported bias, and stupidity. Period. End of story.
And, what's more, what do you mean about "snooping about their business"? A doctor yelling at my sister telling her that her baby won't survive and telling her she's an idiot for wanting to keep it is snooping around someone else's business! And guess what? The baby did survive! So shit on him.
So, to finally answer your question, when people are entirely pro-life, it is not necessarily because they are religious, but because they are opting away from science. Being pro-life is, to many people, cursing a woman with 18 years of hell, along with incredible emotional distress. We know that a fetus is not life, and opting away from science is opting towards something else, religion or otherwise, it really doesn't matter. Getting an abortion is gross, but really just as gross as getting an appendix taken out. If you think it is grosser because the fetus could potentially be life, you are again opting away from science.
This is more blind ignorance on your part- I've offered you longer, more information-packed posts than you have offered me so far, and you're telling me it's unscientific? It's without fact basis? You're so stupid you make squirrels look smart!
You masquerade behind this stupid visage of science when you fail to acknowledge that the damn this is alive- it's grows, it needs oxygen and carbon-based material to live- it's just as alive as any baby seal that environmentalists rave about on a daily basis. It may not be a "human", but it's still a life, just as much as any stupid animal that everyone seems to think is more important than our own race!
I am a Christian, just to let you know, but I think abortion should be allowed under certain circumstances. For example the mother could die if the baby is born, then I would say go through with the abortion, other than that don't do it.
some people might want to have an abortion because they cant afford kids, but this? lol.
just one thought, how could you blame the american deficit or any other worldy econimic problem on abortion, even if 40 million more babies had been born what would push you to think that THOSE children were better then previous generations. What would make THOSE children capable of curing desease or creating 40 million jobs and paying 40 million poeples worth of taxes, the truth is that point is invalid becuase there would just be 40 mil more homeless, or 40 mil more high school drop outs, or 40 mil more serial killers. there is NO information that states those aborted children would make it something big in this world that no one before them could.
There is also NO information to say that they would all be homeless/drop-outs, or that even a majority percentage of them would.
i think he means that some people say you shouldnt abort a baby because it might become the next Einstein or Mozart and in counter he said a baby might be the next Hitler or Manson.
i think abortion should be allowed, im Christian and i feel that a fetus under 3 months isnt a human being and that science should come before religion.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Remember the String of Ears
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."
First of all, there IS information that the 40 million babies would have been growing up in unsafe environments, because, although not ALL abortions are because of lack of a safe place to rase a child, the majority of them are. This is fact, we have done studies.
Next, a cell is life too, but not intelligent life. A fetus doesn't feed it's self, or take in it's own oxygen, it is practically another body part, in the way that you keep your arm alive by regulating blood flow through it. Dumber than a squirrel? No, because the fact is, at the time that a baby is in the womb, it is dumber than a cockroach - in fact, it doesn't have any brainwaves at all until the last three months.
Lastly, you may not like it, but your parents WERE irresponsible. If everybody had 4 children in the space of 100 years, the population would grow by aproxamately 8 times, because the generations overlap. Yes, that's irresponsible. Saying that it is not is being either ignorant or selfish. My parents could afford a 2 MPH Hummer H2 (yes, it is that low, watch Top Gear), but it is not necessary and it is bad for the world. You are, in effect, taking advantage of the fact that other people care about the world when you do something like that.
I don't really see why people are pointing out that they're Christian, ect.
You do not need a religion to have morals and values.
Anyway, I'm pro-abortion if it was a case of rape, and if it's any other reason where you had a choice and did not choose to take that extra precaution then you deserve what you get. A burden that you most likely can't take care of and have to depend on others.
EXCUSE ME! My parents had 4 children, of which I am the second! Are you saying that it was IRRESPONSIBLE for them to have 4 children that they have been FULLY ABLE to support and raise?! That, sir, is complete ignorance, unsupported bias, and stupidity. Period. End of story.
And, what's more, what do you mean about "snooping about their business"? A doctor yelling at my sister telling her that her baby won't survive and telling her she's an idiot for wanting to keep it is snooping around someone else's business! And guess what? The baby did survive! So shit on him.
This is more blind ignorance on your part- I've offered you longer, more information-packed posts than you have offered me so far, and you're telling me it's unscientific? It's without fact basis? You're so stupid you make squirrels look smart!
You masquerade behind this stupid visage of science when you fail to acknowledge that the damn this is alive- it's grows, it needs oxygen and carbon-based material to live- it's just as alive as any baby seal that environmentalists rave about on a daily basis. It may not be a "human", but it's still a life, just as much as any stupid animal that everyone seems to think is more important than our own race!
wtf lol.
some people might want to have an abortion because they cant afford kids, but this? lol.
i think he means that some people say you shouldnt abort a baby because it might become the next Einstein or Mozart and in counter he said a baby might be the next Hitler or Manson.
i think abortion should be allowed, im Christian and i feel that a fetus under 3 months isnt a human being and that science should come before religion.
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."
Next, a cell is life too, but not intelligent life. A fetus doesn't feed it's self, or take in it's own oxygen, it is practically another body part, in the way that you keep your arm alive by regulating blood flow through it. Dumber than a squirrel? No, because the fact is, at the time that a baby is in the womb, it is dumber than a cockroach - in fact, it doesn't have any brainwaves at all until the last three months.
Lastly, you may not like it, but your parents WERE irresponsible. If everybody had 4 children in the space of 100 years, the population would grow by aproxamately 8 times, because the generations overlap. Yes, that's irresponsible. Saying that it is not is being either ignorant or selfish. My parents could afford a 2 MPH Hummer H2 (yes, it is that low, watch Top Gear), but it is not necessary and it is bad for the world. You are, in effect, taking advantage of the fact that other people care about the world when you do something like that.
You do not need a religion to have morals and values.
Anyway, I'm pro-abortion if it was a case of rape, and if it's any other reason where you had a choice and did not choose to take that extra precaution then you deserve what you get. A burden that you most likely can't take care of and have to depend on others.