[uote]And real medieval armor looks shitty most of the time, unless you're a knight in a jousting tournament.[/quote]
thats true, but there are some nice armors that arent tournamental. i have a book full of them.
i think it might be hard to show a cape over armor in games. infact i cant recall any game that has capes and armor in which the cape appears over the armor.
i would like to see capes and cloaks again in d3, but not as armor like they were in d1, rather more like they are in BGII.
NOTE:
Paper Doll. a term that refers to the picture of what your character looks like while wearing the items
as you can see fro mthe screenshot, this character is wearing a cape but it is not shown on the paper doll.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
there could be gothic armor like from near the end of diablo 1. that was the coolest armor. that plus a gothic shield was the best armor.
also, if they didnt do it already, swords that have their own aura. like a light, dark, ice, fire, double damage, defense sword. and the defense swords could double as a shield and would have armor. so you could have 2 swords equipped and that would let you have 2 shields as well so you are basically invincible. i came up with an idea so i win, i suppose.
they have gothic armor in d2, it doesnt look like it did in d1 but it is in the game.
2 swords, yes, 2 axes, yes, but 2 shields? that seems a bit much. the best defence is a good offence.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
NO. Im pretty sure i said that swords would have shield qualities. as in you can block with them and you can have 2 swords without losing the armor of a shield. you know? i think itd be useful, because it was bogus that with a 2 hand sword or big axe (really, any axe) you couldnt have a shield so it dragged you down. you get what im sayin, right? it could be useful. not 2 shields. 2 swords with blocking capabilities.
well that is ok. but im not sure if it can be done, it depends on the graphics engine. i dont recall chars actually blocking attacks in LOD it made a sould if they hit your shield but you didnt actually block the hits.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
I don't know. I don't know.
I just sit here and read, and I despair. Anything being said might be right or wrong, there's no truth, because we don't know anything. What am I supposed to do?
PlugY for Diablo II allows you to reset skills and stats, transfer items between characters in singleplayer, obtain all ladder runewords and do all Uberquests while offline. It is the only way to do all of the above. Please use it.
Supporting big shoulderpads and flashy armor since 2004.
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
care to be more specific on what your referring to?
all classes being ableto dual wield?
or anything else that has been suggested?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
well, if the swords could defend, that would be nice. and like have a barrier spell that costs like, half or more than half of your mana but protects you for like an entire epic/boss battle. it doesnt matter how long the battle is, be it 1 or 100 minutes (geez...), it will work for the whole battle. that would be cool.
i have sais something like that. all classes should be able to weild two small weapons, daggers and knives but classes like the barb would be able to dual wield great swords.
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
it happens, i havent reposted that list in a while.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
thats true, but there are some nice armors that arent tournamental. i have a book full of them.
i think it might be hard to show a cape over armor in games. infact i cant recall any game that has capes and armor in which the cape appears over the armor.
i would like to see capes and cloaks again in d3, but not as armor like they were in d1, rather more like they are in BGII.
NOTE:
Paper Doll. a term that refers to the picture of what your character looks like while wearing the items
as you can see fro mthe screenshot, this character is wearing a cape but it is not shown on the paper doll.
also, if they didnt do it already, swords that have their own aura. like a light, dark, ice, fire, double damage, defense sword. and the defense swords could double as a shield and would have armor. so you could have 2 swords equipped and that would let you have 2 shields as well so you are basically invincible. i came up with an idea so i win, i suppose.
2 swords, yes, 2 axes, yes, but 2 shields? that seems a bit much. the best defence is a good offence.
I just sit here and read, and I despair. Anything being said might be right or wrong, there's no truth, because we don't know anything. What am I supposed to do?
all classes being ableto dual wield?
or anything else that has been suggested?
you ca ncheck it out here http://www.diablo3.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1287&page=23 (2nd post down)