Okay so I've been patrolling youtube videos, forums, and the game itself and a common theme is that people like to say that Diablo 3 is a very disappointing game and that the expectations it had were undeserved and all that usual nonsense.
What?
Diablo 3 is a very good game. First off, the gameplay is extremely well done. Just because it takes aspects of WoW, which is arguably the greatest multiplayer game ever made (coming from a guy who does not like WoW), does not make it a bad game. Just because the map is in the corner and not covering the whole fucking screen does not make it bad. The enemies are very enjoyable and the skills you have are also extremely fun and awesome. Like I finally decided to get a Wizard to Inferno and I realized how much freedom I had compared to all the other Diablo games.
I think that over the course of twelve years of waiting for this game, hardcore fans (don't worry I did this too) made their own Diablo 3 in their head and were very sad to not see their own ideas in the game. I think the story was extremely awesome. Yes I agree that Diablo's taunts were a bit cheesy and Magdha could have been a bit better done, but seriously, who cares? Maghda was a very interesting character and gave Belial a better name. I honestly just wished we could have faught against Imperius -___-
The music is also very good in the game.
The gameplay is very solid, the lore is awesome, and questing/multiplayer is very cool. I don't know why people hate on it so much, but like the old saying goes, haters gonna hate.
Diablo 3 = 9/10
- proletaria
- Registered User
-
Member for 12 years, 8 months, and 24 days
Last active Thu, Jan, 3 2013 15:24:25
- 10 Followers
- 2,174 Total Posts
- 211 Thanks
-
6
Irrational posted a message on Diablo 3 is a very good gamePosted in: Diablo III General Discussion -
1
shaggy posted a message on Idea: Kill Streak = Magic Find BonusI think that this is a solution looking for a problem more than anything.Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
The last thing we need is for players to feel as if they need to go get a 50+ kill streak before they kill that rare/champion. We need as few breaks in gameplay as possible. People would farm the shit out of Leoric's Manor even more than they currently do because it's a pretty easy 30+ kill streak and usually 1, sometimes 2, rare/champion packs. -
2
shaggy posted a message on What do you think about HellGate Public Server???I think you'll probably hear from Blizzard's lawyers at some point, that's what I think.Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion -
3
Beefaaleaf posted a message on This will make you want to play the WizardYet still on the forums complaining :/Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion -
1
Daemaro posted a message on Diablo 3 better than diablo 2?Diablo 2 was only unpredictable because Diablo 1 didn't leave a whole lot to go on. Nearly all of the lore was in the manual except what was happening currently in the game. So when you kill Diablo at the end of Diablo 1, you don't expect him to be alive in 2 so you're wondering how it's possible and what else they threw in. We didn't learn a whole lot between 1 and 2.Posted in: Off-Topic
We learn a LOT more about the Diablo series between 2-3, tons of books were written to flesh the lore out, we have lore carrying over from D2 and D1 as well. Yeah it was sort of predictable in some parts but that's because I came to expect that from the characters as I've grown to know them more. I knew the merging would happen right away, I knew Imperius would have SOME sort of hand in Tyrael leaving The High Heavens and I knew it was only a matter of time before Deckard Cain got himself killed constantly putting himself in harms way. I concluded all of this back in 2008 when they released the first bits of information.
If they would have thrown some sort of curveball that didn't make any sense, like I saw posted as suggestions and theories in the lore forum, I would have been pissed. Things like Imperius working with Diablo, Tyrael becoming corrupt, Lillith being Leah, those would have made no sense to me lore wise and I would have really felt betrayed, like they just tried to do it for shock value. The story was, for the most part, predictable but I'd rather them stick with the lore and true to the characters than to throw in some M. Night Shyamalan twist for no reason.
Wow I just realized that was a whole lot of offtopic...
I view them as just as good. D2 has some things nailed down more than D3 like loot and the ability to PvP at all, but I like some of the systems in D3 better like the combat and the AH (when it finally settles down more). -
5
overneathe posted a message on This must go out to the world ... my sympathies to the poor fellaThat's not rubberbanding. That's lag. Doesn't anyone know the difference?Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
I'm sorry but I hate how words go through "evolution" and stop meaning what they meant when they were first created. What's the point of them even existing when the small specific thing they meant turns to a meaning that already has more than a few words associated with it? It's killing the language.
The very, very specific effect of rubberbanding is when the ingame model of something gets stretched out across the screen due to glitches to the animation of its separate components. The effect looks quite a lot like stretching rubber, thus the name "rubberbanding".
Lag on the other hand is when the game servers haven't realized yet you've moved and return you to your previous direction when they last remember you being. The effect we're seeing in some videos is very often (and I mean very, it's easy to make it happen purposefully) happening close to corners where there is less space the character can move to and the servers have a harder time realizing if you've moved.
The OP's video doesn't even have _that_. It's just a 1 sec lag. He isn't constantly getting teleported, he gets teleported once. There are very, very, very few game companies that can avoid that. If any. -
2
Zakaz posted a message on D3 "DEAD" in 2-3 monthsPosted in: Diablo III General DiscussionQuote from sifuedition
@ LDVvinci
Nice job ignoring his entire point AGAIN. An analogy has to be a relative comparisons and those analogies were horrible ones. He was right.
If you want to make an analogy to a job in the real world, how about this. You can come to work for me. I need you to work 50+ hours a week. At the end of the week, I'll sign a check to you. It may or may not have any value. You should want to work for the extremely rare chance that it could be a large check. In short, there is no guarantee to any reward for your effort becuase that would make you an entittled dbag.
That is more the feeling this forum is trying to impose on anyone who prefers the reward systems of the previous titles in this series. But no, you'll slippery slope that into "I want free purples for logging in".
Speaking of absolutely fucking terrible analogies...
Are you rolling a god damn dice to decide his paycheck? Is the job sitting on your ass watching TV? What if you're doing a job you expected to pay to do in the first place, and now you've actually made money from it?
Seriously, stop trying to give others shit for something and then do a piss-poor job of yourself.
You two can +1 eachother and circle-jerk to until your heart's content, but you're still sounding like entitled brats. There's no slippery slope here (so stop using it, because you sound ridiculous). He very clearly stated he DOES want rewards at an expected point in time (whatever his subjective idea of "reasonable" is), which is exactly what this series has never offered. He's already made money for fuck's sake, but that's not enough "reward." He wants more. Entitlement. Gratification. Get a dictionary, both of you. -
1
Zakaz posted a message on After 320 hours of game time I finally got a set itemPosted in: Diablo III General DiscussionQuote from maka
Quote from Zakaz
People farmed for hundreds of hours in Diablo 2 to get the best gear in the game, don't kid yourself.
"People" farmed? "Don't kid yourself"? He just talked about what he liked to do in D2, and here you come and try to tell him what "people" do? Damn, I thought he was "people"...Damn, I thought I was "people". Because, and this may come as a shock to you, I liked to use completed low level sets and uniques on alts. But I guess we're not "people". Must be some kind of alien or something. Go troll some other thread.
My god man, you are really dense. Let me re-quote the post I was responding to, with the part related to your semantics rant bolded for emphasis.
Quote from Soul
grats on the lucky drops, but in all honesty... we should be seeing a shit load more legendaries and sets... Remember legendary is the new name for uniques so they aren't meant to be so bloody rare that you find shit all of them... They also need to be powerful if they are to be of legendary status.
Don't get me started on how crap the items are in D3 atm. All the rage is about the items sucking so bad with nothing to find bar stupid rares since the sets and legendaries have crappy stats(most). You should not be playing for 320 hours to find 1 or 2 fucking set pieces in a diablo game PERIOD...
Go play a game of Diablo 2 classic or LOD play through to act 5 hell and tell me how many uniques and sets you find now compare that to Diablo 3... You see where everyone is coming from? Don't say you can't compare a 10yr old game to a new release, this should have been done a long long time ago. When you release a sequel it is generally a lot better than the predecessor.
I'm gonna stop here cause man it just isn't a diablo game atm...
The implication here was that because legendary items (even low level ones) aren't dropping like candy from a pinata, this game sucks balls and is actually no longer a Diablo series title. I mean, there's no embellishment there. We'll ignore the warped reality that an item denoted as "legendary" is to be of amazing power always (because something of "legend" is clearly always immortal, all-powerful, etc, and never has anything to do with lore alone /sarcasm), including the very basis for the game we're playing which would indicate that will never be, nor has ever been the case.
It must really suck to see everything in black and white, eh? But hey, those previous posts where you use ad-hominem to respond to someone really makes you the epitome of an upstanding poster around here, right? Enough to warrant your dismissal of others as a troll because they made you look stupid.
-Edit: Indication of sarcasm for the brain-dead. -
3
Belloc posted a message on So i just got banned...WhyPosted in: Diablo III General Discussion
1. There isn't a lack of end-game content -- you're just not satisfied with what there is. That tends to happen when you spend 200+ hours on a game. Diablo 2 was a similar situation for the first year, at least.Quote from mekanykl
Why do you think this is a bad post ?Quote from Kooqu
I really wish we had an option to hand out negative reputation to posts like these.Quote from mekanykl
Is it not enought that people are quitting Diablo 3 in packs due to the lack endgame content, troubleing itemization and rubberbanding every other minute , they also ban the few remaining ones.
2. Itemization is fine at this point in the game. Not every item is supposed to be fantastic. Expansions and content updates will improve it further. This is something that most people fail to realize about Diablo 2 -- It was a very different game at launch, so comparing itemization between the two isn't very useful (I realize you didn't directly compare it to anything, but it's pretty much accepted that everyone's complaints about D3 are inspired by their love of Diablo 2).
3. We have no proof that they've banned anyone for any illegitimate reasons. The Linux complainers were apparently cheating/botting. The OP in this thread may be the same -- he's certainly not going to admit it. Perhaps his account has been compromised. He may be telling the truth, but automatically assuming that his complaint is 100% legitimate is silly considering that no other ban complaints have been confirmed as legitimate. In other words, you'd be a fool to trust every random "I got banned for nothing!" post. It's also foolish to suggest that players are leaving the game in droves. D3 has an active, large player base and this will continue for a long time.
In short, I thought your post was bad because you're complaining about end-game content, which will be improved upon as the game progresses (just like Diablo 2), you're complaining about itemization, which will be improved upon as the game progresses (just like Diablo 2), and you're complaining about false bans when there's no legitimate reason to suspect that any such bans have taken place. You're also spreading the misconception that the game is rapidly dying. It's not.
I have no issue with your rubberbanding complaint, but the rest of your post was awful. That's why I want the ability to neg rep it. -
1
MCMXCIX posted a message on Does The Auction House Ruin The Game?My opinion: if you don't like the idea of getting items without any work, even though you do work by getting gold to trade for it, then don't use the auction house. What other people do should have no effect on your enjoyment of the game. Just because you may or may not like the auction house, that shouldn't mean it should be removed. Now, if you say "Well, it's there, so I have to use it." No. Just, no. It's called willpower. Drugs are available around every corner. Does that mean you have to buy them? No. [/rant]Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
5
There are at least a dozen other threads for that stuff.
2
2
Neither argument really makes sense alone, but together they're a gem of true hypocritical rants.
1
Would anyone like to give me the cliff-notes here?
4
OK! Protesting is stupid. Anyone with enough free time to protest is a useless hippie and a drain on society. That goes double to anyone who's parents have money, because those kids didn't EARN anything! Of course, people shouldn't be taxed for being successful and therefor their offspring are almost guaranteed to be a generation of spoiled, useless, rotten hippie filth, BUT THAT IS WHY WE HAVE POLICE AND JAIL!
Laws are written to be followed. Even very banal laws like "don't loiter," are absolutely keystone to the conduct of a smooth society. What's more, I am sick and tired of every hippie and his hackey-sack taking pot-shot jokes at police and other law enforcement! Everyone knows that once a man puts on the uniform he immediately becomes inscrutably honest, up-right, and deserving of the benefit in EVERY doubt. Sure, there may be some bad apple policemen who've shot and killed innocent youngsters in the housing projects of our cities, but that is a SMALL price to pay for the safety and well-being of our middle-class suburban neighborhoods!
Finally, I've had it up to HERE with poor people. SERIOUSLY, I HAVE HAD IT! They claim to be "disabled veterans," or people "born into low-income families with little or no access to secondary education." Well guess what scumbags? I was born into a HARD-SCRABBLE lower-middle-class household where we only had ONE CAR! Can you believe that?! We were so poor, my family had to no buy a second car just to send me to college! When my father-in-law gave me a six-figure job, it wasn't because I was related to him. It was because I was the best goddamn vice-president of middle-management financial analysis advisory secretary around! Nepotism is a joke because it never really happens. Just like there is no such thing as luck. Only the strong survive and I am living proof of that. After all. I'm relatively successful and I think that I'm strong. Therefor, anyone who isn't successful is naturally weak and probably not worth helping.
God bless America, a christian nation that was definitely not founded by deists. A place where, hopefully soon, the right to vote will again be limited to those who own property, or perhaps shares in blue-chip stocks. I have to get back to the O'Riley factor. He's going to call that smug little liberal juden John Stewart a traitor bound for hell. I need to record it for our Sunday school class.
1
The most conservative pro-life family in the town I grew up (the "Boss Hog," types) in had three daughters, all of whom were known to have had abortions. It was not something they talked about, and they were against it in public, but the fact of life is that the mother decides whether or not the time is right to raise a child and unlike in the wild we don't have the option of seeing how it goes and killing it in early childhood if it turns out to be impractical.
Abortions are going to happen, whether pro-lifers like it or not. They have to realize this and take the steps necessary to keep the mothers safe from back-alley operations that would seriously endanger their health: that is, to not criminalize abortion and not attempt to strategically sap funding from all planned parenthood clinics (they have attempted to do both in recent years).
I can't condemn the pro-lifers for caring (or pretending to care, I can't really tell) about life in general, but I have zero respect for someone who decides the life of the mother is less important than that of an under-developed fetus, or that a struggling low-income family should be forced to raise a child with severe birth defects just because it would be morally reprehensible to terminate the pregnancy. This is the kind of talk that gets a lot of pro-life advocates labeled pro-execution/war/death. The fact that many of them are also war-hawks and in favor of state execution is another reason.
1
Should have got that liberal arts degree.
~tenured
2
Incorrect, the masses just don't give a shit.
I can tell you exactly why TIME didn't run that cover in the US. It's because they wouldn't have sold as many copies due to the mainstream ideology being "Huh? Oh, that's not in America. Who cares?"
The side-effect of being bombarded by FOX-style news media isn't necessarily conservatism, but it is certainly willful ignorance. Anything about another culture that can't be condensed into the type-cast worldview is ignored because ~liberalmediabias~ heh.
1
We certainly have the ability to destroy our "host," environment, but not the planet itself and rest-assured that even if we nuked the planet into a smoking husk there would be a plethora new life-forms around in a million years or less.
1
I see what you did there.
@Dae
Tips for better mornings:
-Stay hydrated all day (esp before you sleep and after you wake up)
-Don't eat and immediately go to sleep, give yourself at least a couple hours to digest
-Get more sleep
-Refrain from drug and alcohol use shortly before bed