Yep, he seriously fucked up there.i also dont like what has been said here. this is rarely the case (at least for me) and it sucks how a minority of pkers are ruining pvp for the rest of us. Diablos gone soft lol.
What's wrong with being more "soft," anyways?
What's the point of continuously hacking away at CPU's? You'd have to admit, the satisfaction of annihilating a fellow thinking entity is far greater than that of subjugating a faulty CPU.I agree entirely, i'm glad it's going to be more player-friendly. Getting PKed and even dueling seems like just a distraction from the actual game. If i'm trying to fight evil, i don't want some guy that's supposed to on my side coming out and trying to kill me while i'm already being killed by demons. There's no point.
0
[shotdead]
0
Exclude it (as he did) and it is 5.
LoD is an expansion. Obviously, if they do 7 characters in the original, 2+ will be extra hard in the expansion. This is super-advanced long-term thinking, guys.
0
But anyways, I don't really care whether or not mercs are back.
0
0
Drops seems to be more slang than a proper word.
I don't recall Blizzard North to have used the word "drops" either, before the "influence of WoW".
Also, the worst case scenario is that the game will be a screw-up, and we won't play, Diablo fan or no. But, as you say, it's unlikely, to say the least, that that scenario will occur.
0
You have to understand, the characters would have to be greatly improved in order to fight without potions and TP. Especially for boss fights. In Diablo 2, I am certain that I couldn't have beaten the game without the aforementioned two.
Also, TP was, in effect, disabled at the area where the ancients resided. It's been done before, with half-successful results; the player could just TP right before the ancients anyways.
Running away is, and has always been an option in DIII. If not with TP, it is usually possible to just escape into the previous level.
0
(Same thing as sorc, but looks way cooler, with a big, colossal robe/cloak, a hidden face, glowing red eyes, a halo, a devil's tail, an eagle's wings, sunglasses, a scarf, one of those ninja-cloths that covers the mouth, and a unicorn horn!)
So_badass TT_TT.
0
Understatement of the minute.
0
Generous with... nothingness! Ohohohohohoho:cute:
0
I wouldn't say that, rather, overconfident, perhaps.
0
...
Le Sigh.
The line between constructive posts and whining is paper thin, and this is not a constructive post.
I seriously do not want to debunk another post, but here goes...
It's NOT based upon "not much to nothing."
They released a GAMEPLAY VIDEO about GAMEPLAY. There is a TREND that GAMEPLAY VIDEOS will reflect GAMEPLAY for the GAME. [SO extremely irritated]
Those that post sh!t like I "FEEL IT" are obviously not posting the right thing.
Those that post reasons for their statements ARE. Although I do not agree with those that disagree with the current art direction, I do not deny that some of them do NOT base their statements solely on so-called "Feelings". Degrading well founded statements to whining is hardly constructive.
I WANNA FEEL THE THUNDER I WANNA SCREAM! [shotdead]
0
What? I am in the "WoW hater" camp because I pick out an objective mistake?
OK, here's my elaboration.
Gothic has many definitions. The one used in context of Diablo 3 is gloomy/horrifying.
Gothic architecture is a STYLE OF ART from the 12th to 16th century, which has nothing to do with neither gloom nor horror.
This is NOT subjective.
Oh. My. God.
Firstly, to clarify, I think that the direction that DIII is absolutely A-OK!
However, there are too many posts (on both sides, to be fair) arguing for the current art direction that are just so... asinine (tee-hee asinine)!
This post is (A) Feigning ignorance to post incorrect claims or (B) Being ignorant. I'm telling it as it is right now, so I apologize that it seems insolent - I'm an impudent person (though I like to call it bluntness, honesty, et cetera).
There are two ways to show the asininity (tee-hee asininity) of this post.
A (parody)
Cute
I searched and could not find any of those X definitions to reference the rainbows, pink fluffy ears, or a lack of gruesomeness and manslaughter. It is 100% OK for some people to find faults in fluffy wuffy bunnies, but "cute" is not a word they are looking for as best I can tell.
B (debunk)
Big shoulderpads supposedly look unrealistic and consequently cartoony, which contradicts gothic.
Green light is not traditionally gothic.
Bunnies and rainbows are not traditionally gothic.
Yes, gothic is the word they are looking for. It means gloomy/horrifying, which is what they want in the game.
These points should be understood and accepted before further debate.
0
[/thread]
0
I'm not saying this subjectively.
Objectively, the title "gothic architecture" doesn't infer that the architecture is "gothic".
So, I can "just" say "no, that[']s wrong".
EDIT: OK, here's my elaboration.
Gothic has many definitions. The one used in context of Diablo 3 is gloomy/horrifying.
Gothic architecture is a STYLE OF ART from the 12th to 16th century, which has nothing to do with neither gloom nor horror.
0
Women are evil, it doesn't have to be proven mathematically.
However, according to Einstein's fourth law of psychology, evil is akin to badass.