it would be cooler if they put shrines but you couldnt know what they were going to give you, a fire ball or replenish mana... like a trap
honestly, those fire shrines were inutile after 2 days playing D2...
Kind of like how the Treasure Chest in the gameplay video was?
Is that what you mean?
Good idea, but if you havent noticed, Wii's have unreliable internet connection,
and it would also be VERY hard to communicate with other players.
You would have to go into a list of letters and click each letter 1by1 and by the time your finished you would be killed by a mob.
I dont HATE WoW,
but it's just, too....
over-populated (Cant think of the word)
Like warcraft 3, that didnt have comercials, didnt have 10 year olds, didnt have cartoon graphics.
But WoW, they just did too much marketing.
Commercials just brought in all the 10 year old spongebob watchers.
The cartoon graphics also added to the 10 year old population and decreased the older population.
WoW is a teen/kid game, diablo is a young adult/adult game,
PLEASE KEEP IT THIS WAY BLIZZARD!
IMO.
I think Barbarian/Ranger are going to be the BEST classes.
Barbarian kind of reflects a fury warrior from WoW, but seems much more for smashing and gashing.
I've ALWAYS loved rangers/archers, being a archer on Runescape; Hunter on WoW; I just think that they cant make D3 without a bow&arrow type person.
Id like to see some kind of telekinetic/psionic kind of character.
his/her skills would include being able to pick up debris off the ground with their mind and throw it at enemies. also gather smaller debris and have them orbit around the character for a time, at high levels effectively making the character a walking tornado, with rocks and boulders damaging enemies when it hits them.
Also able to possess a monster and control the monsters movements for a time (while the actual player remains stationary)
what do you guys think?
(sorry if this has already been suggested but i wasnt going to read through 166 pges)
I really like this idea.
That would be cool.
But instead of posessing a monster, you create a golem, out of the stones laying around.
0
0
Is that what you mean?
0
You cant judge the game just from a 20 min gameplay video where they aren't even half done.
0
I am a very active RPG player, so i think i'll catch on fast.
0
Could yo.u explain it to me?
0
and it would also be VERY hard to communicate with other players.
You would have to go into a list of letters and click each letter 1by1 and by the time your finished you would be killed by a mob.
0
but it's just, too....
over-populated (Cant think of the word)
Like warcraft 3, that didnt have comercials, didnt have 10 year olds, didnt have cartoon graphics.
But WoW, they just did too much marketing.
Commercials just brought in all the 10 year old spongebob watchers.
The cartoon graphics also added to the 10 year old population and decreased the older population.
WoW is a teen/kid game, diablo is a young adult/adult game,
PLEASE KEEP IT THIS WAY BLIZZARD!
0
I think Barbarian/Ranger are going to be the BEST classes.
Barbarian kind of reflects a fury warrior from WoW, but seems much more for smashing and gashing.
I've ALWAYS loved rangers/archers, being a archer on Runescape; Hunter on WoW; I just think that they cant make D3 without a bow&arrow type person.
0
Witch Doctor isnt human, hes like a troll, or something.
I wouldn't be surprised if they fuck it up even worse.
0
That would be cool.
But instead of posessing a monster, you create a golem, out of the stones laying around.