• 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Quote from "refraction" »
    IIRC it was to allow the gates of hell to open and let all that is evil through in to the mortal world. Obviously the soul/world stones were protecting the mortal realm, so he attempted to "corrupt" it to essentially nullify it.

    Tho when you think about it that way, destroying the thing is probably worse!

    Actually, I think the worldstone is suppose to break the boundaries between heaven and hell (demons were already on the mortal realm even when the worldstone was uncorrupted :P).

    So I think tyrael was corrupted by baal somehow (his soulstone was never destroyed), and baal made tyrael finish his initial plan. Which was to break the boundaries between heaven and hell, therefore allowing hell to run loose on heaven. Remember years ago, "sources" said diablo III takes place in heaven? Making a lot more sense now.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Quote from "DunHammer" »
    Malah
    "If Tyrael says the Worldstone must be destroyed, then it must. We cannot let Baal's corruption prevail! The world will change, true -- but who is to say it isn't for the better?" QualKehk
    "The destruction of the Worldstone does not bode well for our world. But I'll try not to worry… After all, we have warriors like you fighting for us and for the Light. Farewell!" Cain
    "So…The Worldstone was corrupted by Baal. And now Tyrael must destroy it. Worry not. Through whatever lies ahead I have faith that the Light will guide us both. Anya
    "Strange that you say that the Worldstone must be destroyed. The prophecies said nothing about that. Perhaps all we have fought for will be lost…or perhaps we'll never need fight again!" Leaves a sort of cliff hanger, lol. Very nice!

    Exactly. Which is why now I think Blizzard has actually opened themselves up for another sequel.

    For those who missed it. its here http://diablo.wikia.com/wiki/Worldstone

    Also. Just to clear things up. Destroying the soul stones ONLY prevent the prime evils from corrupting the mortal realm. They might not be actually dead. Since they could still screw up heaven now that the world stone is destroyed. (Which I think is baal's initial plan :D . Thats a big twist)
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Lol I was up reading Diablo Wiki. And a Diablo III is making more and more sense.

    http://diablo.wikia.com/wiki/Worldstone

    The fate of baal's soulstone has never been revealed. And also, from the link above, it would seem like the worldstone may not necessarily need to be destroyed at all. And Tyrael may have been corrupted by baal before hand, and baal's actual plan was to break the worldstone, which allows hell to run lose to heaven.

    I think a Diablo III is very promising. I really do believe it will be revealed in WWI.

    edit: Just to add. Soulstones ONLY prevent the prime evils from corrupting the Mortal realm. But says nothing about screwing heaven up
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Has anyone ever wondered what would've happened to the heroes in Diablo 2 if there was a Diablo 3?

    Remember, some say that the warrior of Diablo I was the wanderer, the Summoner was the Mage and the Rogue was Blood Raven.

    But there is no specific hero for Diablo 2, so maybe all of the heroes killed the prime evil together?
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Quote from "blade2006" »
    Hell'o i'm newbie! Here is the hot news.

    Quote:
    Speaking under conditions of anonymity, a senior UK development source has claimed today that the Blizzard Worldwide Invitational game announcement Rob Pardo alluded to in Paris this morning is definitely Diablo III. A second, highly-placed European source has also just told us that they are “sure” that Diablo III will be revealed on Saturday afternoon at the event.

    Do you have a source on this??
    P.S Sorry dont know how to quote a person who quoted....

    I think its fair to say, that if Diablo III wasn't announced and that the "media" has been lying to us. I'm pretty sure we'll start seeing murder cases on the news with a letter D and III on the victim's chest. But that is only speculation, it might not happen. Afterall, Blizzard could be giving out false announcements.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Quote from "floyd626" »
    I just wanted to mention that the picture they have been posting in sections is one of the fanarts from a while ago. I checked the fanart section to reference this as proof...but it seems they have removed the picture and added a "?" in it's place. There is also a caption that states "This space intentionally left blank by Falthorn"

    Not sure who or what Falthorn is supposed to refer to...the pic is on page 13 of the fanart stuff.

    Someone really needs to make a thread that sums EVERYthing up.


    But right now, I think blizzard is making us look closer and closer to the monitor. And before you know it, on saturday. POW RIGHT IN THE KISSER.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Quote from "IonStorm999" »
    yea i kno damm it so can u inform me what the lil markings are?

    There really isn't a proper "theory" on what those markings are yet unfortunately. Some say it looks like infinite, some say they're numbers, which links to diablo 3 and starcraft 2 or even the amount of time before the release date.

    I for one haven't paid too much attention on those signature like things. But the one that looks like an infinite, beside the protoss symbol, looks a bit like one of the diablo runes. Whiles the one beside the frostmourne one is just....... all over the place. Btw the frostmourne rune has altered if you missed it.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Quote from "IonStorm999" »
    hi guys just woke up i feel asleep around 2:40(est) yesterday damm i woke up to this great news yay
    anyways idk if someone has said this or not but does anyone see little markings off of each rune just outside the circles?

    I think the general rule when you leave the forum and return again a few hours later is that :

    Diablo Fanatics have beaten the dead horse to the point where gold is coming out of the horse's arse.

    Whatever you see on the picture, will have already been mentioned over 60 times in the previous 1 post.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Quote from "GimmeD3" »
    how about this?
    (selfmade :P)
    could be a hint for diablo:cool:

    Bad drawings never fail to amuse me.:P
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Do the smartasses realize they're being dumbasses.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Quote from "Stupified" »
    I will donate half of my next month's pay to Red Cross if its related to WoW or Starcraft.

    I don't mind if its related to SC2 or Warcraft. As long as diablo 3 is going to be announced, I don't care if Blizzard is making Sims Vs Warcraft.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Quote from "thefarrow87" »
    uh guys, its world of warcraft related, I want it to be diablo 3, but think about it. Its on blizzard.com and worldofwarcraft.com it is not on starcraft2.com so think about it

    So if a company was going to announce a new project only 1/3 of the fans should know?
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on Please confirm - Another CSS hint?
    The CG looks a lot more realistic. I think its part of the teaser :)
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Quote from "enofr" »
    Hah! Major insult right there! Least lore in SC? Bullocks! It has tons of it. Fact is there are 3 (4 with hellfire) Diablo games, and 6 warcraft games - and hold on... 1 starcraft game. Wow, huh?

    One can never say any blizzard game lore is least developed. They expand to books :O. But for me, starcraft had a very good lore, very thought out, and very detailed. If you ask me, Starcraft 2 was truely blizzard's masterpiece. The story was so genius, so twisted, when I first played it I went crazy. Now add that to the 9 years of waiting sequel and the biggest cliffhanger of them all. Ouch for starcraft fanatics.

    But still, I am around 80% sure that the announcement will be Diablo 3, solely because Blizzard is just too good with lore to start an IP through MMORPG, which usually have no real base at all.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on WWI Teaser - Day 3
    Quote from "Enslave" »
    there's never been a discussion about it.. blizz sources has always claimed that the diablo universe WILL be revisited.. just like starcrafts.. it's just a matter of time anyhow =)

    Starcraft Fanatics suffered a lot more than any other of the franchises. At least diablo had a quite a quick sequel. Starcraft..... had the biggest cliff hanger compared to warcraft and diablo, and required the longest time for a sequel.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.