all i can say is holy crap u got all that in 4 days? Took me around 30k bloodshards to just get TnT :''( lol
I find that hard to believe unless he played 4 days as in 96 hours. Prob took me at least a couple of weeks if not longer to get what I have and I think his 4-day gear is better than mine.
No joke, I just know how to be beyond efficient with this current patch. Rng loves me, look at all my characters gear. I even have a perfect unity.
yeah RNG totally loves you man, like holy hell even IF I were efficient that wouldn't happen to me lol. But your character has got the gear and goddang is it pretty
So are you saying physical or fire is your build of choice for t6? For me physical wins T6.
Well I had a pet garwulf/4mara/tnt physical build.......and I was doing T6 with ease.....new fire build with 6pc.....still doing it with ease...about to toy with your 6pc phys.....gonna have to suspect aht will be done with ease too.....lol,
I've had success with physical and fire builds on DH. So I personally think its a preference. But then again I'm not sitting here with a stopwatch timing my runs.....I like to play with my own pace and get lazy (still probably 15-20 min at most lol) and use my naga while playing/watching TV. So.......I'm not gonna sit here and be like I know fire/phys is the best.....I just think both are viable lol.
I'm just here to defend that physical builds are viable and aren't trash like one of the first posts mentioned lol.
I know a lot of DHs on this forum including Chad who just posted and we have clearly came to the conclusion that while both are viable for T6 , physical is the most efficient for farming T6 rifts
Good to know, like I said I'm no expert. Just a person who likes to play and watch ESPN at the same time lol. Nothing like killing stuff while listening to Stephen A Smith shout in the background.
So are you saying physical or fire is your build of choice for t6? For me physical wins T6.
Well I had a pet garwulf/4mara/tnt physical build.......and I was doing T6 with ease.....new fire build with 6pc.....still doing it with ease...about to toy with your 6pc phys.....gonna have to suspect aht will be done with ease too.....lol,
I've had success with physical and fire builds on DH. So I personally think its a preference. But then again I'm not sitting here with a stopwatch timing my runs.....I like to play with my own pace and get lazy (still probably 15-20 min at most lol) and use my naga while playing/watching TV. So.......I'm not gonna sit here and be like I know fire/phys is the best.....I just think both are viable lol.
I'm just here to defend that physical builds are viable and aren't trash like one of the first posts mentioned lol.
I run a similar spec, but with some fire dmg instead (you can see some %phys cause I'm in the process of converting and was toying with both) and honestly I can say both specs are t6 viable. I can say TnT is honestly the biggest difference maker if you're deciding on a physical build. It's great in the build I'm using as well.
Physical builds are super viable
I just couldn't sit there and literally watch people say physical is trash.....
At this point in time, I really do think it's whatever your preference is. Fire and Physical both succeed with a good setup.
TnT should be mandatory for physical builds...
...and I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say Mara 6pc is undeniably in the lead for build setups for both fire and physical.....the frequency at which these turrets spit out hatred spenders is just.....redonkuolous
If I take 6pc Mara to be the most important part of the fire build.......I can honestly say I'm going to Take TnT over cindercoat because of the sentries.
I don't understand, what's so good in physical? None of the physical spenders are even close to CA:LfB, with Cindercoat you can spam CA yourself in addition to sentries which is a big dps boost, the only pet that does good damage is a Wolf, not to mention pets are simply dumb and you can't direct their attacks any way. I really don't see any advantage.
Different flavor. Certainly cindercoat sways builds in fire's favor, but that doesn't stop people from trying different elements. I'm running 6 pc bonus with Tasker and Theos w/o cindercoat and I honestly like it better as I find the sentries more useful when they fire faster. So, I think its honestly preference and it kinda gets boring when every class I play goes fire with a cindercoat.
Also even though I'm going mostly fire atm with 2 hatred spenders with CA LFB and Multishot arsenal, on T6 I'm finding Im using Multishot arsenal more.........don't exactly prefer CA:LfB's AOE coverage.
Nope. Physical sucks imo, fire much stronger with the current build + rune benefits.
I wouldn't say it sucks......but I don't believe it shines until you get Tasker and Theo gloves for that insane pet attk spd increase. 50%!
Then you start seeing the true damage your pets start doing and I have to say its quite impressive. I used that spec till not long ago.......it's also pretty amusing cause you just let your pets and sentries do all the work and all you have to do is pepper in your razor disk chak. I find it to be a relaxing build lol....
It certainly is viable t6 and I find it to be one of the more survivable builds for t6. May not be the fastest, but does its job damn well.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Sorry I won't deter this thread anymore! lol.
I've had success with physical and fire builds on DH. So I personally think its a preference. But then again I'm not sitting here with a stopwatch timing my runs.....I like to play with my own pace and get lazy (still probably 15-20 min at most lol) and use my naga while playing/watching TV. So.......I'm not gonna sit here and be like I know fire/phys is the best.....I just think both are viable lol.
I'm just here to defend that physical builds are viable and aren't trash like one of the first posts mentioned lol.
I run a similar spec, but with some fire dmg instead (you can see some %phys cause I'm in the process of converting and was toying with both) and honestly I can say both specs are t6 viable. I can say TnT is honestly the biggest difference maker if you're deciding on a physical build. It's great in the build I'm using as well.
Physical builds are super viable
I just couldn't sit there and literally watch people say physical is trash.....
At this point in time, I really do think it's whatever your preference is. Fire and Physical both succeed with a good setup.
TnT should be mandatory for physical builds...
...and I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say Mara 6pc is undeniably in the lead for build setups for both fire and physical.....the frequency at which these turrets spit out hatred spenders is just.....redonkuolous
If I take 6pc Mara to be the most important part of the fire build.......I can honestly say I'm going to Take TnT over cindercoat because of the sentries.
Also even though I'm going mostly fire atm with 2 hatred spenders with CA LFB and Multishot arsenal, on T6 I'm finding Im using Multishot arsenal more.........don't exactly prefer CA:LfB's AOE coverage.
Then you start seeing the true damage your pets start doing and I have to say its quite impressive. I used that spec till not long ago.......it's also pretty amusing cause you just let your pets and sentries do all the work and all you have to do is pepper in your razor disk chak. I find it to be a relaxing build lol....
It certainly is viable t6 and I find it to be one of the more survivable builds for t6. May not be the fastest, but does its job damn well.