I really just wish they would have had different categories.
It's really a moot Top 200 List since half of the games are near unplayable nowadays. I would think the main point of a list like this would be to remind people how great a game was so they can play it again, or show people how great a game they had never tried was.
But alas I'm left with games which I've played, and systems which are basically extinct.
Really. It makes little sense to rank games that are across multiple generations and platforms.
Exactly.
Great Zelda got number one, too bad I've already played it, even if i wanted to play it again where the hell am I going to get a NES, not to mention going back THAT far on games, just doesn't feel right.
It's like going from riding in a car all your life to a horse drawn buggy. Or turning off your lights and having to carry a lantern around.
It's really a moot Top 200 List since half of the games are near unplayable nowadays. I would think the main point of a list like this would be to remind people how great a game was so they can play it again, or show people how great a game they had never tried was.
But alas I'm left with games which I've played, and systems which are basically extinct.
Basically what game pops into people's heads the most.
Actually it seems they used some sort of system, still just seems like popular games to me.
http://gameinformer.com/blogs/editors/b/gireiner_blog/archive/2009/11/25/the-process-behind-the-creation-of-issue-200.aspx
Exactly.
Great Zelda got number one, too bad I've already played it, even if i wanted to play it again where the hell am I going to get a NES, not to mention going back THAT far on games, just doesn't feel right.
It's like going from riding in a car all your life to a horse drawn buggy. Or turning off your lights and having to carry a lantern around.
I'd love to see a list of what they think is best for just PC.