If Diablo II is such a bad game, why do you have a level 81 Barbarian? Do you enjoy playing bad games? Your logic seems to be raping itself.
Congratulations, you can insult me like the immature, little troll you are. Brilliant! Do you have any other tricks?
As I said many old faces/friends have came back and for me big part of multiplayer games is the community and friends. I would never touch this game if there wasn't any friends to play or even chat with.
For u it seems like biggest part is the artistic style or then u are just trolling by urself.
Yeah I insult since you seem to be picking fight against anyone who likes the way game is going now. No matter what the topic of the thread is.. i've seen it before. so stfu.
i would say mindless fan boys vs constructive criticism..
besides..i dont play games..just very few..and d2:lod is one of them ( mod )
I know its hard to choose - good old stuff, or new..Why new if old was good..why old if making new game.. Why new, it will replace old, and definately it will be felt - something is missing.. and so on.. and so forth..
Just let them change textures a bit and it will be good for few more years..who know how long we will live
It would be even harder to choose to move forward from old if they hadn't patched Orginal D2 aswell to the state where it now is. Now there is no other options but to move forward to the next one since now the game is somewhat shitty. Only bright thing about is the community that kinda shines atm since many old faces came back.
Blizzard North are the only company that could ever create Diablo III, seeing as Diablo is their series; unfortunately for us gamers, that's not the way the video game business works.
Looks like you're the idiot here, go see a shrink or find some other way to deal with your issues than trolling in forums.
Only issue was that this guy thinks the game is already bad when it's not even in the stores yet and no one has played it. I tought Hellgate London could be pretty nice game.. but hey I played it and found out it was piece of crap. So imo it is just a waste of bandwidth to post things like that when you haven't even played it yet.
I think that blizzard north would have done a superb job on Diablo III if they where they ones that completed the project.
I would also like to point out that, considering they didn't have a fraction of the funding they had available to them when they where working with blizzard, does not make them less creative or bad game developers. I believe that if with the right funding Hell Gate London would have been a big success, sadly though they where limited to what they could do, and they probably made a miracle happen with whatever funds they had.
If they still had the funding and backing of Blizzard I'm more than sure that we would all be playing their masterpiece(Diablo III) by now and loving every second of it.
At they very least I'm sure they would never have even thought "I wonder what would happen if we make a Fast Paced Action RPG version of WoW" - which sadly seems to be what was going on in the heads of the current developers when they where working on it.
I wouldn't trust so much to Blizz North. Yes they made a great games Diablo and Diablo2 but the expansion turned out to be nothing more than a resolution upgrade to the good old diablo with some features that made the gameplay a lot worse.
Well I guess when the orginal D2 was maybe more designed to single play at beginning after they saw the popularity of the multiplay they made a lot of changes to the game to allow better multiplaying(no screen freeze from sorc spells etc) too bad they didn't manage too well with it. It was only 1 year of orginal D2, if they had spend 1 more year to create the expansion I'm sure it would have been a lot better.
So yeah after that screw up I'm happy it's not Blizzard North that is doing the game. And it really looks great so far.
RIP: Demon Hunter: lvl 50 | Barb: lvl 60 (plvl 5) | Monk: lvl12 & lvl70 (plvl 200)
For u it seems like biggest part is the artistic style or then u are just trolling by urself.
Yeah I insult since you seem to be picking fight against anyone who likes the way game is going now. No matter what the topic of the thread is.. i've seen it before. so stfu.
RIP: Demon Hunter: lvl 50 | Barb: lvl 60 (plvl 5) | Monk: lvl12 & lvl70 (plvl 200)
It would be even harder to choose to move forward from old if they hadn't patched Orginal D2 aswell to the state where it now is. Now there is no other options but to move forward to the next one since now the game is somewhat shitty. Only bright thing about is the community that kinda shines atm since many old faces came back.
Lol what a BS GTFO idiot.
RIP: Demon Hunter: lvl 50 | Barb: lvl 60 (plvl 5) | Monk: lvl12 & lvl70 (plvl 200)
bah could as well lock this thread :)'
RIP: Demon Hunter: lvl 50 | Barb: lvl 60 (plvl 5) | Monk: lvl12 & lvl70 (plvl 200)
RIP: Demon Hunter: lvl 50 | Barb: lvl 60 (plvl 5) | Monk: lvl12 & lvl70 (plvl 200)
Well I guess when the orginal D2 was maybe more designed to single play at beginning after they saw the popularity of the multiplay they made a lot of changes to the game to allow better multiplaying(no screen freeze from sorc spells etc) too bad they didn't manage too well with it. It was only 1 year of orginal D2, if they had spend 1 more year to create the expansion I'm sure it would have been a lot better.
So yeah after that screw up I'm happy it's not Blizzard North that is doing the game. And it really looks great so far.
RIP: Demon Hunter: lvl 50 | Barb: lvl 60 (plvl 5) | Monk: lvl12 & lvl70 (plvl 200)
Seriously idiot.
RIP: Demon Hunter: lvl 50 | Barb: lvl 60 (plvl 5) | Monk: lvl12 & lvl70 (plvl 200)