Funny article; biased or otherwise. I feel inspired to add my own comments.
Whilst I expected that there'd be some objections raised by those that don't like to see change, I'm somewhat surprised at the volume of complaints flooding the internet about the look and feel of D3.
I can appreciate the 'if it ain't broken, don't fix it' mentality, which is a handy motto in some areas of life, but I can't understand why some people have harped on (and on, and on...) about Blizzard needing to produce a sequel to our beloved D2 and then, when it's finally announced, whine that it's not a carbon copy of something that was designed around the limitations of technology that's a decade old. I just want to shake these people out of their comatose slumber, give them a copy of today's newspaper to prove what the date is, then wow them with other such improvements of the 21st century as MP3, HD televisions, broadband internet connections and double-sized Snickers bars.
Good for Blizzard that they've rendered their world with richer detail. Applause for making the gameplay faster by dispensing with the potion-belt. A slap on the back for providing us with what appears to be a very exciting new character class. A bit of cheering for the refining of abilities on an old favourite class. A little jig for what can only be summed up as progress. More, more!
How dare the detractors suggest that Blizzard spend this amount of time produce something that would, if they had their way, effectively be just another expansion set? Shame on you all (you know who you are...)
And, at the ripe old age of 37, I would have expected that I'd be the one to be a bit stuck in my ways...
Very nicely put, you just made take a step back and think. sometimes we are afraid of change, but the way you put it, it is indeed for the better:thumbsup:
Just curious if they were even expecting polarity, i mean they knew all along on what direction they were going to take
Its like the old famous saying "Beauty is in the of the beholder"
Very nicely put, you just made take a step back and think. sometimes we are afraid of change, but the way you put it, it is indeed for the better:thumbsup:
A microscopic majority or minority, it wont give you accurate data,for that you need more diversity from different pools of people