I don't like the idea of voting someone who we have no evidence for or against, they die, we end up with nothing gained just one less chance of surviving. :/
Going with my suspicion.
Vote: Molster
Thing is, someone not posting can be two things.
1. They're lurking scum and unless we punish lurking, they'll continue to just sit back and surf under the radar.
2. They're an inactive innocent whose only contribution is padding our safety buffer against a loss. But it's better to lynch those than active innocents, since active innocents actually contribute to us finding scum.
Either way, it's usually better to vote out inactives when you have no leads at all.
thats why I want to go back on what I alreayd posted, and noone commented on.
but I duno...if apple is good, then we are losing a someone we need, if we kill someone who is good...and is not playing...we didnt lose much, thats my thoughts until we get some solid theories going at least.
Going for the people that are not playing to me is a win/win but I guess thats just me?
I actually agree with the idea of voting out lurkers more than actives. At least when we have no leads.
Honestly, Fire and Apples probably are both innocents. The real mafia are likely just sitting back watching this all confident-like because that's usually how Day 1 plays out.
That being said, I don't think we should worry all that much about lynching an innocent. This is how the game plays out, we inevitably lynch innocents. This isn't a bad thing though for several reasons:
1. It narrows the field, both by eliminating wrong ideas about the lynch-ee and by reducing possible options for those that remain.
2. It gives us information about the lynched player's role.
3. We can glean information on who might be scum based on voting patterns and what is said.
Really, unless we get a lucky guess, I don't think it will be until... Day 3 until we lynch a scum. That's just an estimate based on how mafia games in general tend to play out.
because obviously there were 3 evils before illith joined. hes probably a neutral.
Or he could just as easily be an evil convert who isn't one of the 3 big bads. Always gotta be careful about assuming roles with people who join when the game is already in progress.
Also, what's with the mass bandwagon on Fire?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
☢ CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION ☢
☢ CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION ☢
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Thing is, someone not posting can be two things.
1. They're lurking scum and unless we punish lurking, they'll continue to just sit back and surf under the radar.
2. They're an inactive innocent whose only contribution is padding our safety buffer against a loss. But it's better to lynch those than active innocents, since active innocents actually contribute to us finding scum.
Either way, it's usually better to vote out inactives when you have no leads at all.
☢ CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION ☢
Vote: Knucker
☢ CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION ☢
I actually agree with the idea of voting out lurkers more than actives. At least when we have no leads.
☢ CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION ☢
That being said, I don't think we should worry all that much about lynching an innocent. This is how the game plays out, we inevitably lynch innocents. This isn't a bad thing though for several reasons:
1. It narrows the field, both by eliminating wrong ideas about the lynch-ee and by reducing possible options for those that remain.
2. It gives us information about the lynched player's role.
3. We can glean information on who might be scum based on voting patterns and what is said.
Really, unless we get a lucky guess, I don't think it will be until... Day 3 until we lynch a scum. That's just an estimate based on how mafia games in general tend to play out.
☢ CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION ☢
"more"
How's that for ya? ^___^
☢ CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION ☢
Or he could just as easily be an evil convert who isn't one of the 3 big bads. Always gotta be careful about assuming roles with people who join when the game is already in progress.
Also, what's with the mass bandwagon on Fire?
☢ CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION ☢