Hello everyone, I'm wondering how important is area damage on rings because I'm not sure which one of these two rings to use. http://imgur.com/a/ce9FB
Is it better to use ancient one with augment (+300 strength) or non ancient one with area damage?
I'm currently trying to push GR 74.
don´t listen to him (in general pls he has no idea about barbs in obviosuly...). area dmg is rly important and the rolls u want on your rings are area dmg,crit,crit. i would compare the dmg stats of both rings. 20% area dmg is 4% more dmg for each mosnter in a 10yard radius... if both would be ancient/non ancient u would always take the area dmg ring... but without that i would compare stats and just try it
No AD for MotE as earthquake is the only skill that procs it.
should be exactly the other way aroung: EQ doenst proc AD. the rest does.. but outcome is the sam leap barb doesnt want AD right now.. not even on shoulders.
From what I've tested and seen only the active skill of EQ procs AD. All the other skills that trigger EQ do not provide AD. They did at first but during the 2.4 PTR they removed AD from skills that procs EQ because of extreme lag.
obviously comparing to you i´m the biggest expert. everythign u say here in the forum is 99% of the time just wrong because u have no idea...AD is extremely important and the funny thing is it is only bad in the build u said it is good and it is extremely good in the builds u said it is bad in lel