Revised Rules & New Signature Limit
The majority of updates to the rules were in form only, not in function. We have updated the look and feel of the rules so that they are easier to read and look less like a wall of text. Please review the changes so that you can be fully aware of what the rules are and so you can follow them.
Some rules have been tweaked, others have been added (or removed). One of the main additions to the rules has been a standardized Signature Size Limit. This is very important. Everyone (including the staff) must cut down their signature sizes to within this limit within two weeks - or they risk signature removal.
Thank you for your continued cooperation and contributions,
The DiabloFans Staff
But, I won't argue with you in that I really want to hear something new. And I don't mean just some screenshot of the dungeon again with some monsters and a skill, I mean something with more meat, so to say
We can only wait. Or, if you have some news, you could always submit it. I think it gets reviewed and then posted if it's adequate. Or you could just make your own thread where it would make sense (like the Diablo III forum, or any of its two subforums).
So, anyway, my question:
Say I have an image in my signature (which I do), but I want to add a bar- I'm not sure what they're called- like this:
I figured it's about the size of one line of text, and it's not really a signature "image" since its so short- is it okay if I have that and an image in my sig? The rules don't really say anything about having these little things in there, it just covers a main image and 3 lines of text. So I'm not sure if I'm supposed to interpret it as "only these are allowed" or not.
About sigs:
My sig is text only, is there any problem with its size?
Thanks.
I'd have to dissagree. Many of our mods are good, some are down right awsome, but for a few, it's a miracle that they were chosen to be a mod, and one must ask what (or who) they did to get Moderator/Administratorship...
But yea, most are good... Most...
Still...
I think the main problem he has is that they are leaving alot of wiggle room for mods to do as they please, meaning going after people they may or may not have a personal vendetta against, which may or may not have anything to do with the forums. Which is bad, as mods are supposed to put there personal feelings to the side when the moderate.
But that's what I'm getting out of his posts. Of course, I may be wrong and he may be meaning something completely different, but that's what I am seeing from his posts.
Which is why I have gotten in trouble before for civilly dissagreeing with certain religous groups and certain Blizzard writters? Key word there is civilly.
I think we had them back in late '07 but not as an announcement...
Honestly I think that some mods will say it's ok and others will be anal about it, so I think it'd probably be best if you just had one or the other...