The only one that is questionable is the one in the center, but given the details around at best it is questionable. The other parts are not part of the CLEAR outline details of the face. Do you even read the post before you quote it?
You can't say there isnt snow dots over his face...... So why not over his damn horn.
And by the way, the ice isnt melting, it exploded, the hole is getting bigger and is PUSHING the ice.
None of the clear images of the face can you see dots of snow, I repeat none. All you can see dots in is the parts you can see through.
Also the explding part does not hold with the image. If it exploded there would be additional damage to the ice around the hole, which there is not. It appears more to be melting. It would take longer to melt the outside then where the melting started.
If the snow goes over the face, it's not only in the background, duh.
Except for 2 flaws in this therory.
A) the depth shows clearly the dots in the background
if diablo was hot enough to melt through ice the snow, which melts at a lower temp, would surely have melted by now.
ITS OKAY GUYS, EVERYONE CAN GO BACK TO WHAT THEY WERE DOING. YOU CAN DRAW A DOT IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT HAS DEPTH TO IT, SO IT CANNOT BE DIABLO.
Sigh you are really an idiot. I never state that in the least. You cant just draw a single dot and it have depth. But you can make a drawing with a dot incorporated into it and make the rest of show depth so you can see if the dot is in the foreground or background. In addition I never stated the game is not diablo, but you of course anything that makes it look like it will not be diablo is jut dismissed by fanboys such as yourself, no matter the evidence.
So now you are trying to tell me that because there are edges drawn on the main ice form, you can see that DOTS are in front of or behind the main focus of the image? You aren't even worth dealing with, just like every other horrible troll on the internet.
I am saying the way you make details allows you to see depth. Apparently you have never drawn anything realistic.
Are you honestly going to try and troll? Have you seen the layered PSD? No. You cannot possibly say "oh well it wouldn't make sense that they are horns because im a fanboy and want it to not be diablo, therefore the snow appears behind whatever shape that is"
Not made to be 2 dimensional? ITS NOT A RENDER MORON, Its a flat image.
A) I would enjoy it if it is diablo just as much as any of you hear, I am just unbiased, where you are not, in short I am not the "fanboy" here.
IF it was 2d you would not be able to make out edges. All you need for 3d is to be able to make out the 3 axes, when you can. Even if you can not actually rotate the image, you can still see the height width and depth, otherwise calling the specs ice would not make any sense.
lol because u can obviously tell if something is in front or behind another object on a 2 dimensional image and all right?
This is not made to be 2 dimensional, it is 3 dimensional, or are you going to tell me now that the eyes could be in the foreground and not behind the ice?
Its the snow over it, because the horn is behind it. And I don't think it's star... Because you can see dots over the face too....
So it is snow dots? all it what you will, they are till in the background, not foreground, meaning they cant be on horns, the horns would have to be transparent.
How do you explain Diablo in Diablo II doesn't look like Diablo in Diablo 1, so why wouldnt he looks different in Diablo III
And no, Just look on the original splash if you are too dumb. Its not hard to see there is a part that isnt smoke. It has a solid texture, I mean, cmon.
You can say the one on the right CAN be solid, but the one on the left has a crack almost completely through it making it not solid.
You can make it look like anything you want it to. How do you explain the point between the eyes? For diablo it is much lower, in a nose point, not in the brow.
I'm one of us from the USA. Just called them out in particular because they killed Manhunt 2, Doom, and much more. I'm just glad they didn't nerf AoC like other countries.
As bad as AOC is, I wish they had, maybe they would have worked to polish the game more hehe.
0
The only one that is questionable is the one in the center, but given the details around at best it is questionable. The other parts are not part of the CLEAR outline details of the face. Do you even read the post before you quote it?
0
None of the clear images of the face can you see dots of snow, I repeat none. All you can see dots in is the parts you can see through.
Also the explding part does not hold with the image. If it exploded there would be additional damage to the ice around the hole, which there is not. It appears more to be melting. It would take longer to melt the outside then where the melting started.
0
Except for 2 flaws in this therory.
A) the depth shows clearly the dots in the background
if diablo was hot enough to melt through ice the snow, which melts at a lower temp, would surely have melted by now.
0
Sigh you are really an idiot. I never state that in the least. You cant just draw a single dot and it have depth. But you can make a drawing with a dot incorporated into it and make the rest of show depth so you can see if the dot is in the foreground or background. In addition I never stated the game is not diablo, but you of course anything that makes it look like it will not be diablo is jut dismissed by fanboys such as yourself, no matter the evidence.
0
I am saying the way you make details allows you to see depth. Apparently you have never drawn anything realistic.
0
A) I would enjoy it if it is diablo just as much as any of you hear, I am just unbiased, where you are not, in short I am not the "fanboy" here.
IF it was 2d you would not be able to make out edges. All you need for 3d is to be able to make out the 3 axes, when you can. Even if you can not actually rotate the image, you can still see the height width and depth, otherwise calling the specs ice would not make any sense.
0
This is not made to be 2 dimensional, it is 3 dimensional, or are you going to tell me now that the eyes could be in the foreground and not behind the ice?
0
So it is snow dots? all it what you will, they are till in the background, not foreground, meaning they cant be on horns, the horns would have to be transparent.
0
Since when could you see through horns? I still see background dots, the snow/stars, what ever you want to call them in the "horns"
0
If you want to consider it "snow" It makes more sense that this is still mist then that it is a horn
0
So which is it, is it solid or not solid? You were the one claiming it is solid.
0
You can say the one on the right CAN be solid, but the one on the left has a crack almost completely through it making it not solid.
0
You can make it look like anything you want it to. How do you explain the point between the eyes? For diablo it is much lower, in a nose point, not in the brow.
0
As bad as AOC is, I wish they had, maybe they would have worked to polish the game more hehe.
0
It could be a new game completely, it could be the new MMO they have been working on.