• 0

    posted a message on The Dark Knight
    huh?? this movie sucked soooooo bad...I almost fell asleep

    it was WAY too long, it had no plot!!! no plot at all...not even a climax, it was just a whole bunch of scenes/series put together, felt more like "batman the series back to back", and they rushed it after the 1st half of the movie, the characters had no development and didn't connect, they guy playing the batman can't act for crap, the whole deep voice thing was just stupid and annoying, and when the batman fought, he looked like a midget with tiny arms trying to use karate moves.

    The movie should've been called "the joker", he did an OK performance and appeared more than the batman himself. the joker didn't impress me much, people are just flipping over him all because he died, Jack did much better. There was too much pointless talking that didn't even add anything to the movie, and why did batman want to stop being a hero? Did he forget why he became the batman in the 1st place? the movie had a few good parts, like the batmobile turning into a motorcycle, the joker doing his "magic trick" and when they showed two-face's face for the 1st time. Movies are supposed to make you want to keep watching and have a plot and at least a climax, not just random action and pasted together scenes, it was like they started a whole different movie every 20 mins...the first 6 mins were def the best in the whole movie, then after that it starts to drag it out

    By far not the best movie I've ever seen, not even a "good" movie....it's just too overhyped
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on have you seen family guy
    Quote from "JAZZ" »
    Some bad shows in my opinion are

    Aqua teen Hunger force
    Assy Mcgee
    and
    Squidbillies.
    agree 100%

    also to add to the list:

    Harvey birdman
    Frisky dingo
    12 oz. mouse


    family guy is only funny sometimes...and i hate the stupid flashbacks or when they drag out something for too long, like when peter falls and hurt his leg or has that stupid fight with the chicken...south park hasn't been that funny lately but it is still funnier than family guy
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Good Horror Movie, Please.
    the movies that people suggested that I have watched and KNOW are good:

    *"the fly" and the "fly 2". Epic movies, very cool, and the fly 2 doesnt suck as most part 2 movies do

    *the devil's rejects" not so much scary, but great plot and entertaining, nice gore too. def must watch

    *cube" also great, more of a suspense-horror, very unique movie

    tale's from the crypt tv series are always good too..but yeah..haven't found any other good horror movies really :/.....I can guarantee you will enjoy the movies I suggested

    PS: I always wanted to watch "the thing" too...gonna give that one a try
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Percentage Complete
    only 15%? damn :/...they have a long way to go still, I don't think we'll see diablo 3 until at least the beginning of 2010...demo maybe in the middle of 2009
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Items with negative attributes...
    I think it's a good idea, it worked well on diablo 1...blizzard should really learn from diablo 1
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Diablo 3 Bootskin
    Quote from "Num3n" »
    cool stuff, is there a guide as to how to get it to work>?

    im running xp 32
    just install the program (bootskin) and then download the diablo 3 bootskin, that's it, if you have the program installed it should recognize the diablo 3 bootskin right away when you double click it

    if not, then just open up the bootskin program and choose file>import from file and choose the diablo 3 bootskin and it'll change your bootskin
    Posted in: Diablo Wallpaper and OS Art
  • 0

    posted a message on New Diablo 3 Bootskin
    Quote from "anakyn" »
    *sad d'oh...*

    Is it possible to learn this power?
    (Not, from a Jedi...)
    well, there was a way to do it (hard way) in vista, but that's no longer possible since SP1 version of vista is out, so if you don't have vista SP1, then you can still do it, but it'll be very hard and involves replacing system files and it could potentially harm your computer :/...so yeah...you'r stuck with that ugly vista bootskin since there are no programs that change it and you can't hack it anymore
    Posted in: Diablo Wallpaper and OS Art
  • 0

    posted a message on New Diablo 3 Bootskin
    Quote from "anakyn" »


    Any idea how well it gets along with Vista?
    100% NOT compatible with vista, since this is a windows xp bootskin, I'd have to make a version of this for vista, but sadly I can't since none of my computers have vista :/
    Posted in: Diablo Wallpaper and OS Art
  • 0

    posted a message on New Diablo 3 Bootskin
    Quote from "anakyn" »
    Sweet!

    Edit: Except I don't like the reviews/rating that the Bootskin program receives on Download.com (the ultimate destination of that link)...
    ____

    E
    True, but the people at download.com are idiots! They either tried to use it with another program that conflicts with it (like tuneup or another bootskin, visual style modifier) or used a corrupted bootksin (like one they tried to make themselves or meant for another bootskin program) the "bootskin" program is the mos tused and safest program for changing bootskins and I've been using it since 2005 with no problems at all with windows xp
    Posted in: Diablo Wallpaper and OS Art
  • 0

    posted a message on New Diablo 3 Bootskin
    Here's a bootskin I made for someone on DA, looks pretty good IMO



    Click Here To Download
    (only works with windows xp, so don't use it if you have vista, and if you do have vista....then shame on you :/..)


    *you need this program to use bootskins: http://www.stardock.com/products/bootskin/
    Posted in: Diablo Wallpaper and OS Art
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo 3. Opinion survey
    You are wrong. Diablo is not the game for you then, go back to wow or find another game
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on G4TV's Adam Sessler Attacks Diablo 3's Art Haters
    I agree with vegas :/..

    the art direction is not bad, it just doesn't fit diablo at all, if we didn't know that diablo 3 was being made and we looked at that barbarian woman screenshot, we would never think that it's diablo 3, we would think it's from a new WOW game or something, but not diablo.

    and blizzard is not changing the graphics because they already made most of the game using WOW ideas and WOW looking graphics, they said it themselves that diablo 3 is very influenced by WOW, and WOW makes money so if they take some things from WOW they are hoping to attrack WOW players too and hope it will be almost as big as WOW...all of us diablo fans will buy diablo 3, even if we like it or not just to see how it is.

    Blizzard north really didn't think diablo would make a lot of money, they just made a great game (even with its few flaws it was still great) without thinking about making a lot of money, but this is not blizzard's case anymore, I remember when they listened to their fans and made games because they wanted to make great games, not because they wanted to make money.

    there are way to many blizzard fans that think they can't do anything wrong, that they are game making gods or something and trust blizzard completely, I don't really think blizzard has made any good games besides diablo and diablo 2 (exp not included), WOW is total crap and played by losers and little kids. I remember playing diablo 1 and having the crap scared out of me, I was actually afraid to go in a fight the monsters and I'm sure a lot of you got at least chills playing diablo 1 and it wasn't only scary, but it wa salso fun and it took skill and thinking, but diablo 3 has lost the "diablo" heart and doesn't really feel like diablo anymore, diablo 1 had crap graphics, but at least they did what they were meant to do, inmerse you in the game and scare you.

    It sucks that the graphics look colorful and too soft and have no texture or defenition at all, like most people say, they look like paintings, if I wanna look at a painting then I go to a museum, but I don't wanna kill a zombie that doesn't look like a zombie or walk through a monster infected section that doesn't look scary, graphics might not play an important part in most games, but they do in diablo, and I too like vegas don't play many games and carefully choose which ones to play because I don't have much time to play games and I rather use it playing a great game than just random other not so good games

    blizzard's arguments about the gaem are not substantial either, it's all bull because they just DON'T wanna change the graphics and want to appeal to as many people as possible, thus they are aiming for a non mature rating too :/
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • 0

    posted a message on New Diablo 3 Wallpaper (widescreen)
    Quote from "Diablo-Fiend" »
    Pretty good. I like it. :)

    You've done quite well with Tyrael's wings. Mustn't of been easy to keep them glowing and not chopping them up.

    One of the better Tyrael wallpapers I've seen so far, good job. ^_^

    I didnt render it though >.<, my rendering skills are limited, i just finished it up
    Posted in: Diablo Wallpaper and OS Art
  • 0

    posted a message on New Diablo 3 Wallpaper (widescreen)
    I just got done making this wallpaper, and I think it came out good, so here it is, tell me what you think, I think it's better than what blizzard has made so far :/ XP...if u like it maybe i'll make it in different sizes

    1280x800: http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb160/LD006/diablo/tyrael.jpg

    [not my renders, i just put it together and finished the edges and wings on tyrael so it doesn't look too cut out]
    Posted in: Diablo Wallpaper and OS Art
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo3.com becomes Diablofans.com! Blizzard acquires diablo3.com.
    I think this could be either good or bad. 75% chance that they will announce diablo 3 at wwi which is why they finally got diablo3.com, or 25% chance that they don't want any sites about diablo 3 because they are never making it and they want anyone who types anything about diablo to go directly to blizzard and maybe be interested in other blizzard games (like wow) since there's no diablo 3
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.