I'm still a nub when it comes to crusader passives, so if there ARE passives that make 1h'ers viable compared to two handers, then yea I apologize.
But as it stands I completely agree. The addition of the 4th passive slot only compounds the issue; Unless you're going for a VERY specific build, the only downside is the movement speed penalty when taking Heavenly Strength. Why on Earth would you NOT want to take that and increase your dps?
There needs to be another passive ( I vote to not roll it into heavenly strength and instead use a different one / make a new one) that gets 1 handers close, to within a few %, of using a 2 hander and a shield. The choice seems obvious; Double your stats on your weapon and use a shield, or use a 1 hander and a shield, bleh.
I'm still a nub when it comes to crusader passives, so if there ARE passives that make 1h'ers viable compared to two handers, then yea I apologize.
But as it stands I completely agree. The addition of the 4th passive slot only compounds the issue; Unless you're going for a VERY specific build, the only downside is the movement speed penalty when taking Heavenly Strength. Why on Earth would you NOT want to take that and increase your dps?
There needs to be another passive ( I vote to not roll it into heavenly strength and instead use a different one / make a new one) that gets 1 handers close, to within a few %, of using a 2 hander and a shield. The choice seems obvious; Double your stats on your weapon and use a shield, or use a 1 hander and a shield, bleh.