When I saw this problem I thought: "why won't I just put the data in a graph?"
So I took the skill points 3-20 and the corresponding Life and used my trusty program. Then I let the computer draw a line through all the points and I looked at the result.
The result was that the data is wrong, well at least incorrect. It seems that those numbers given are integers, whereas it should be doubles. So then I corrected them.
I went to this:
21 31.5 42 52.5 63 73.5 84 94.5 105 115.5 126 136.5 147 157.5 168 178.5 189 199.5
This also makes much more sense. Now the increase each level is linear, as we would expect. First it was +10, +11, +10, +11 and now it is +10.5 each level.
So now we get a perfect correlation, being:
Life = (Skill - 1) * (50/100) * Base
This is, of course, for levels 3 and upwards. Levels 1 and 2 use the base level.
So I took the skill points 3-20 and the corresponding Life and used my trusty program. Then I let the computer draw a line through all the points and I looked at the result.
The result was that the data is wrong, well at least incorrect. It seems that those numbers given are integers, whereas it should be doubles. So then I corrected them.
From this:
21 31 42 52 63 73 84 94 105 115 126 136 147 157 168 178 189 199
I went to this:
21 31.5 42 52.5 63 73.5 84 94.5 105 115.5 126 136.5 147 157.5 168 178.5 189 199.5
This also makes much more sense. Now the increase each level is linear, as we would expect. First it was +10, +11, +10, +11 and now it is +10.5 each level.
So now we get a perfect correlation, being:
Life = (Skill - 1) * (50/100) * Base
This is, of course, for levels 3 and upwards. Levels 1 and 2 use the base level.
Join the chat!