i know it pretty good, it has just about everything now
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
I think it diablo 3 should also be harder. I feel like LoD is too easy.
I disagree... I think the 1.10+ patch really made it too difficult. It was a lot funner when you could just shread thru all the monsters. Parties were so fun b/c it was like a "who can kill all monsters first" race.
Now, you NEED to party just to survive. = NOT as fun
plus I'd like a few characters that give you quests that aren't necessary... you know-- just more extra minor quests that you dont have to do, but it will give you some extra points or something
Actually, what I really HATE, and i DON'T want to be in D3 is the fact that with synergies, you can actually have sorcs that are stronger melee than Barbs, palys that are better bowers than zons, etc.
I think classes should still be better in their specialy than other classes that use crappy new skill combos to take over a speciaty that they normally wouldn't be good at. You know what i mean?
yeh medievil rocks, but diablo is humans only and thats the way it should be
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
warrior = diablo
sorcerer = summoner
rogue = blood raven
cain = cain
griswold = corrupt griswold
wirt = dead
adria = trapped soul in act 4 with patch 1.12 if it ever comes out
that leaves
the drunk farhnam
the barmaid
the taven owner and his wife
the healer pepin
the bard from hellfire
the barbarian from hellfire
the monk from hellfire
the cow suit guy from hellfire
but we are getting of topic again, amazing how often that happens
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
um yeh, so can anyone think of anything im missing from my 'need in d3' list?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
You need to be able to kill npc's so that you can become evil if yoyu are good. And another thing that I think is necessary because I missed it soo much when d2 came out even though it was really shite in d1...The ability to zoom right in on the character and chech out what you are wearing.
In d1 you used the zoom to look for items but I used it to check out what my person looked like. because there were some really cool outfits. They need to put the ability to zoom back in diablo 3
yeh, if they have quests in d3 like the rescue cain quest if you are evil you should be able to um not rescue them, or kill them, rescuing isnt very evil like.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
Yer i just read that if you fail to rescue cain before you kill andariel that you actually get charged 100 bucks everytime you get your items identified by cain...
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
1. Hundreds if not thousands of more items, uniques especially, sets, etc.
2. No immunities in hell....its not fair to sorcs.
3. More then 1 "good" build for each class.
4. Monsters like souls shouldnt be so powerful
5. More classes
6. More skill tabs (fire, cold, lightning, *magic*) for example.
7. A couple more Acts
8. Another item type "like runes" such as elements, as well as more gems and like 30-50 more runes and runewords.
9. pvp needs to be way different, ppl should drop 1 of their weilding items if u kill them.
Ill edit and add more as i think.
so you want Diablo 3 to be easier than Diablo 2??? is that really nessicary??? i mean serioulsy, the games a joke already, hell baal 9 Fireballs.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
What do you get from hope??
has hope ever made a game for you?
Dont mean to Step on ur cherries, but im here to denounce lies
um yeh, so can anyone think of anything im missing from my 'need in d3' list?
well first off a team who is goign to make diablo 3,
then, the money in witch to do so.
blizzard to actualy care.
uhm got any magic wands? lamps or things of that sort? they will help alot
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
What do you get from hope??
has hope ever made a game for you?
Dont mean to Step on ur cherries, but im here to denounce lies
yeh i know my list seems a bit like that, but blizzard doesnt really do expansions to expansions like Maxis (the sims) does
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I disagree... I think the 1.10+ patch really made it too difficult. It was a lot funner when you could just shread thru all the monsters. Parties were so fun b/c it was like a "who can kill all monsters first" race.
Now, you NEED to party just to survive. = NOT as fun
I think classes should still be better in their specialy than other classes that use crappy new skill combos to take over a speciaty that they normally wouldn't be good at. You know what i mean?
Whats next on the agenda? Who was the guys who own the inn in D1
and what was his wifes name?
um let me think
warrior = diablo
sorcerer = summoner
rogue = blood raven
cain = cain
griswold = corrupt griswold
wirt = dead
adria = trapped soul in act 4 with patch 1.12 if it ever comes out
that leaves
the drunk farhnam
the barmaid
the taven owner and his wife
the healer pepin
the bard from hellfire
the barbarian from hellfire
the monk from hellfire
the cow suit guy from hellfire
but we are getting of topic again, amazing how often that happens
In d1 you used the zoom to look for items but I used it to check out what my person looked like. because there were some really cool outfits. They need to put the ability to zoom back in diablo 3
That could be a con to being evil
so you want Diablo 3 to be easier than Diablo 2??? is that really nessicary??? i mean serioulsy, the games a joke already, hell baal 9 Fireballs.
has hope ever made a game for you?
Dont mean to Step on ur cherries, but im here to denounce lies
(i dislike cherry)
well first off a team who is goign to make diablo 3,
then, the money in witch to do so.
blizzard to actualy care.
uhm got any magic wands? lamps or things of that sort? they will help alot
has hope ever made a game for you?
Dont mean to Step on ur cherries, but im here to denounce lies
(i dislike cherry)