To be honest, with the millions they are making off WoW, I doubt they will have to charge for another game anytime soon
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lord Silver guide us... Lord Silver teach us... Lord Silver protect us... In your light we thrive... In your mercy we are sheltered... In your wisdom we are humbled... We live only to serve... Our lives are yours...
lol i hope that blizzard charges the crap out of the other games and leaves the diablo franchise fee-free but with superior graphics. this will piss off everyone else big-time. (no offense to warcraft and starcraft lovers)
well, i disagree. By this i dont mean i want Diablo multiplayer to be payed for, ofc. What i mean is that i dont mind to pay for a service i get. Its how everything works nowadays. If they give me 0 hackers, no lag, good servers, frequent patches that add new content and a great game and i'd gladly pay for that service on a monthly basis (as i do with WoW).
which is from 11 to 13 Euro/month (depending on the way u pay)
well, i disagree. By this i dont mean i want Diablo multiplayer to be payed for, ofc. What i mean is that i dont mind to pay for a service i get. Its how everything works nowadays. If they give me 0 hackers, no lag, good servers, frequent patches that add new content and a great game and i'd gladly pay for that service on a monthly basis (as i do with WoW).
which is from 11 to 13 Euro/month (depending on the way u pay)
that was just what i was thinking if they can manage to update or fix bug each week like in WoW that would make diablo even better then it already is and that is just what it needs...
its not that easy to do on a non-MMORPG game, tho. In WoW for example except the bug fixes, hacker/bot bans that happen on a weekly basis we get a nice load of new content. If u added all these new instances/talent changes, World Events, Seasonal stuff etc u'd get one really nice expansion for any other game. Just for good quality servers and bugfixes i wouldnt consider it worth it to pay on a monthly basis. Most single-player games like Diablo use expansions to stay alive and sell some more 1-2 years after release. But multiplayer is an option for these games, not the main/only feature. Blizzard and any other company that makes single-player titles goes for good game balance. Not to make it run in best quality on the internet - by this i mean the server quality (Especially if its free).
well, i disagree. By this i dont mean i want Diablo multiplayer to be payed for, ofc. What i mean is that i dont mind to pay for a service i get. Its how everything works nowadays. If they give me 0 hackers, no lag, good servers, frequent patches that add new content and a great game and i'd gladly pay for that service on a monthly basis (as i do with WoW).
which is from 11 to 13 Euro/month (depending on the way u pay)
If Blizzard does an excellent job, and Diablo III is better than the 2nd, i will not mind paying. If die hard Diablo fans do pay the monthly fee (alot will pay for it), then blizzard will see how badly we want to play Diablo III and with the money they earn, they will make more games.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
For the sake of SICK and the glory of Lord Silver.
Those whom have taken in the wicked, shall be punished by thy Lord.
Those whom have trechered into the dark, shall be smited by thy Light.
I want diablo III to be like diablo two in terms of multiplayer, i.e there is Single Player, Closed Battle.net, Open Battle.net (SP chars on multiplayer) and TCP/IP and for it to be free to play.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
the creaters of diablo said that they will never chage monthy for diablo, lets hope blizz keeps that promise
Lord Silver teach us...
Lord Silver protect us...
In your light we thrive...
In your mercy we are sheltered...
In your wisdom we are humbled...
We live only to serve...
Our lives are yours...
quite very true, ait was Bill Roper that made that statement but he left blizz
well, i disagree. By this i dont mean i want Diablo multiplayer to be payed for, ofc. What i mean is that i dont mind to pay for a service i get. Its how everything works nowadays. If they give me 0 hackers, no lag, good servers, frequent patches that add new content and a great game and i'd gladly pay for that service on a monthly basis (as i do with WoW).
which is from 11 to 13 Euro/month (depending on the way u pay)
that was just what i was thinking if they can manage to update or fix bug each week like in WoW that would make diablo even better then it already is and that is just what it needs...
EU is the shortened version of European Union. mostly used for "Europe", tho.
he quoted me, so i said what i ment.
though it would cause some anger, its just an idea for now.