- TwilightRealm
- Registered User
-
Member for 17 years, 9 months, and 15 days
Last active Tue, Aug, 8 2017 20:13:04
- 9 Followers
- 1,258 Total Posts
- 9 Thanks
-
Mar 16, 2010TwilightRealm posted a message on The History of DiablofansMy favorite year was 2006 with all the rumors, silversurfnstud(ism), people's epic bio's, the overall vibe, and ambiguity.Posted in: News
I remember Darkjay and his epic axe... -
Mar 9, 2009TwilightRealm posted a message on Diablo and Doom combined! Diabloom? Doomablo?Havent played it but the screenshots look pretty cool. If its as good as it sounds this could be the best thing since boogie boards! Doom, my fav fps and diablo my favorite rpg... godly. eh i better wait till I actually play it though, but if it sucks in gameplay this concept should still be remade better, ill ahve to wait and see. Theres a game called Cold Zero which kinda reminds me of this style, it was a pretty crappy game though imo.Posted in: News
-
Apr 30, 2008TwilightRealm posted a message on Diablo3.com becomes Diablofans.com! Blizzard acquires diablo3.com.wow i never would have thought it was coming even within a month that our old site would be handed over to blizz, i feel special cause i was an "oldie" on diablo3.com aw yes old memories... DIABLO3 IS COMING!!Posted in: News
o btw i hope we chagne the background color back to the orangish tan color the old site had. or at least one easier to tell whats going on.. i liked the old site looks... -
May 7, 2007TwilightRealm posted a message on Blizzard Confirms New Product Next Month!If it was Diablo3 i would feel more relieved though.Posted in: News
-
Mar 26, 2007TwilightRealm posted a message on "Official" Diablo 3 Petitionnah, people will just think its a scam... no trust these days on bnet.Posted in: News
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
One of the best things ever said about John Frusciante, quoted from a user on youtube... "Thank you so much John Frusciante for being a constant example that you can sound bad ass on guitar without doing neoclassical sweeping arpeggios etc."
0
Dude, I totally agree with what you just said and can't say it any better. People are going to believe what they want.
On a sidenote here is what I believe and a short explanation to why...
I believe in God and Jesus as the son of God. I believe the bible and live by it the best I can.
Why?
C.S. Lewis made a statement about Jesus that went something like this... Either he is a liar, lunatic, or Lord.
Saying Jesus was just a good moral teacher is the easy way out of answering who Jesus really was. Either you believe he was a liar (one who perpetuated a lie/hoax through beatings and eventually to his death on a cross), a lunatic (who taught morals that most human beings live by today in a general sense), or Lord. Now I don't know about you, but it I don't know many people who would be willing to take a lie to the point of being killed for it, knowingly. Jesus as a lunatic doesn't make much since either, his teachings would not line up with a madman.
How many religions serve a risen Savior? There is enough evidence to prove that Jesus grave was found empty, but to make this short... you have to decide whether it's because he was who he said he is or if it was some kind of hoax.
Also, our universal time system is based on this one lowly, poor man. Even if "BC" and "AD" are under attack, "BCE" and "CE" are still based on the same starting point from his life, funny huh?
I also find it ironic that people question the existence of Jesus in general, to whether he was even a real man, given the fact there is more evidence for his existence compared to Socrates.
At some point a hoax, and esp. one of this grand exposure would be solved, but millions believe and the reason why is because the evidence for Jesus being who he said he was outweighs a hoax.
That's my opinion.
EDIT: (from wikipedia)
C. S. Lewis was an Oxbridge medieval historian, popular writer and Christian apologist. He popularised the argument outlined above in a series of BBC radio talks later published as the book Mere Christianity.
"I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God. That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronising nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to. ... Now it seems to me obvious that He was neither a lunatic nor a fiend: and consequently, however strange or terrifying or unlikely it may seem, I have to accept the view that He was and is God." [5]
Lewis's trilemma is based on the view that, in his words and deeds, Jesus was asserting a claim to be God. For example, in Mere Christianity, Lewis refers to what he says are Jesus' claims:
* to have authority to forgive sins—behaving as if he really was "the person chiefly offended in all offences."[6][7][8]
* to have always existed,[9] and
* to intend to come back to judge the world at the end of time.[10]
Lewis argues that these claims logically exclude the possibility that Jesus was merely "a great moral teacher" because he believes that no one making such claims could possibly be rationally or morally reliable, unless he were God. Elsewhere, Lewis refers to this argument as "the aut Deus aut malus homo" ("either God or a bad man"),[11] a reference to an earlier version of the argument used by Henry Parry Liddon in his 1866 Bampton Lectures in which he argued for the divinity of Jesus based on a number of grounds, including the claims he believed Jesus made.[12]
[edit] Formal structure
The premises are as follows.
(P): Jesus claimed to be God.[citation needed]
(Q): One of the following must be true.
1. Lunatic: Jesus was not God, but believed that he was.
2. Liar: Jesus did not believe he was God, but spoke as if he did.
3. Lord: Jesus is God.
From these premises, it is argued, it follows that,[citation needed]
(C): If not God, Jesus is not great and not moral.
0
0
I have 2 songs on youtube I made with audacity, they're experimental psychedelic, if you want to hear'em I'll post'em but I don't wanna steal your thread, let me know
0
My sig is a line from a chili pepper song "Power of Equality" for those of you that don't know
0
0
0
Interview With The Vampire - Just an amazing book. Easy read and great character development.
0
@Metzcrag - Thanks for the try but that's just the first chapter of the book.
I don't know what I'm gonna do. I had a guy summarize the book to me the other day and I took some notes down so I'm just gonna role with it I guess.
0
Man this is not good... I know nothing about this book and gotta write a 750 word book review on it...
0
Aight so I gotta do a book review on the book "A Mayan Life" which I haven't read.
Here's the catch... There is no sparknote entry, cliftnote entry, and my search optimization skills seem to be pretty rusty because I can find NOTHING on this book...
The only thing I need is a summary of this book or even any information on it...
Any help would be so appreciated!
Thanks guys!
0
0
0
0
EDIT: Like how did geo. determinism effect how they played sports/types of sports in contrast to northern native american tribes? - That's the kind of contrast I need help finding.