Question, why shock pulse over electrocute? Golden rune in both do the same thing, and electrocute is far more predictable than shock pulse. Yes, shock pulse is slightly more damage, but it is random in its pathing. If all of your enemies are only on one side of you, then there is a 50% chance for each pulse to never hit an enemy. You'd literally need to stand face to face with enemies in order to make sure all three shock pulses actually hit targets. Standing face to face with enemies I imagine is the exact opposite of what a "glass cannon" would prefer to do.
I know you did mention that you were already debating the usefulness of shock pulse in the first post, but I thought it'd be something to bring up again. From all of the videos I've seen, shock pulse is great when it actually hits, but like plague of toads, it is a very unruly spell and can give vastly different results per cast.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
What are you willing to sacrifice?
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I know you did mention that you were already debating the usefulness of shock pulse in the first post, but I thought it'd be something to bring up again. From all of the videos I've seen, shock pulse is great when it actually hits, but like plague of toads, it is a very unruly spell and can give vastly different results per cast.