No, they've found traces of chemical compounds which life is known to produce on Earth. It's indirect evidence of life, but no fossilized life has been found.
Are you sure? Because I remember the close up pictures that nasa released showing what they suspected to be a micro-organism.
If you eliminate the probability that it a civilization was annihilated by a nuclear war, or something like a great flood or war or what ever. You are left with two possabilities, the first being a polar shift and the other being a naturally occuring nuclear reaction.
A naturally occuring nuclear reaction is beyond unlikely, but it is possible.
So if there was a pole shift, maybe there are wreckages and artifacts on the South Pole? I don't think the poles would exactly shift so dramatically, but you have to consider that we have no first hand data on such an event, save for a few fossils.
Not very likely. There's a sheet of glass in Africa that is about 6,000 years old I think which can be created by nuclear explosions. However, a meteor can also create the same effect. All requires is some masive heat.
You'll definately have to dig up a link if you want us to buy that it exists everywhere in the world.
I took a few minutes to try looking for it, but all I found were more conspiracy theory websites. I guess I can't prove it.
If mankind was wiped off the face of the planet, even by the most horrendous nuclear war tomorrow, evidence of our species would last much longer than 15,000 years. I'd bet it would last longer than 200,000 years also. With our current technology to detect the extraordinarily subtle, we should be able to detect something as monstrously effecting as an advanced civilization
I agree that people often have a warped view of ancient technologies (especially the theoretical, like ancient mathematics). Some people think that all they had was a lion cloth and two sticks to rub together... But some people think cavemen ran around with gravity guns :rolleyes:
P.S - I kept that link, and when i get an hour or so, I'll watch it the entire way through
If Egyptians had electricity then where are their electrical devices and generators?
If they were intelligent enough to have complex electrical supplies then wheres the technical diagrams and electrical mathematics etc
Some people go 'ancient technology' crazy... There have been times in history where historians have been surprised at ancient technology I'm sure. Like intricate calculating machinery and very primitive electrical sources which are way ahead of their time. Ancient civilizations were also much better at moving large objects than was previously thought...
But to say that they were somehow MORE advanced then todays technology is just plain stupid. Satellites, electronic computation, combustion motors, flying machines... evidence? no... *sigh*
Not directed at you Ranim, directed at crazy people
You can easily say logically that it was improbable. But we have barely anything from 15,000 years ago so how can we absolutely rule out the possability that at an earlier point there was a civilization that was similarly advanced or more than ours. There is at least 200,000 years of unaccounted history, even if we were not as sophisticated as we are now. How is it that we are genetically incompatible with Neanderthals, while we're at it. Fly cars is a stretch but we live in a country where the ordinary would have caused people like George Washtington to shoot at cars at first sight because he would think they are mechanical demons
There is a paper thin sheet of the glass that is made from a nuclear explosion (I think it's called Trinitium) spread across Europe, the Mideast, Northern Africa and India, deep under the soil simultaniously at a layer point in all excavated areas dating to at least 6,000 years old. I don't even know if there is a link that talks about it, it's been years since I learned about it.
Despite that though, we're still re-evaluating our perspective of the past, so I'm still a moderate to it.
A naturally occuring nuclear reaction is beyond unlikely, but it is possible.
So if there was a pole shift, maybe there are wreckages and artifacts on the South Pole? I don't think the poles would exactly shift so dramatically, but you have to consider that we have no first hand data on such an event, save for a few fossils.
I took a few minutes to try looking for it, but all I found were more conspiracy theory websites. I guess I can't prove it.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ancientatomicwar/esp_ancient_atomic_01.htm
There's the link anyway.
John Deer made the Earth!
You can easily say logically that it was improbable. But we have barely anything from 15,000 years ago so how can we absolutely rule out the possability that at an earlier point there was a civilization that was similarly advanced or more than ours. There is at least 200,000 years of unaccounted history, even if we were not as sophisticated as we are now. How is it that we are genetically incompatible with Neanderthals, while we're at it. Fly cars is a stretch but we live in a country where the ordinary would have caused people like George Washtington to shoot at cars at first sight because he would think they are mechanical demons
There is a paper thin sheet of the glass that is made from a nuclear explosion (I think it's called Trinitium) spread across Europe, the Mideast, Northern Africa and India, deep under the soil simultaniously at a layer point in all excavated areas dating to at least 6,000 years old. I don't even know if there is a link that talks about it, it's been years since I learned about it.
Despite that though, we're still re-evaluating our perspective of the past, so I'm still a moderate to it.
This guy is right about a lot of what he claims, but some of what he says is baseless rubbish