Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
2.5D is the best thing I have heard. FPS graphics may hurt the Diablo feel.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
It will retain its single player setting, but we could still compare the b.net option to a MMORPG.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
Update: either I am losing my mind, or this thread recieved 600+ hits overnight, cuz it was at 16xx yesterday!
I know this because I was getting ready to announce the 2000th hit, but by the time i looked today, it was at 25xx...
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
It depends on which "diablo" trademark you picked, there are three, all nearly identical, except for small deatils like dates
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
I did happen to come across a "Diablo II: Salvation"
I don't know if that means much though. I noticed it was pattened around 2003 or 2002. you'll have to re-check.
Cmon guys, Diablo 3 is under the trademark I pointed out earlier.
Diablo II: Salvation will be a collection of all of the CGs found in the game, nothing more, nothing less. It is fairly old news, dating back before any one of us regitered for these forums.
I repeat, Diablo II: Salvation will not be a game.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
How do you get to see that page again? I went and did what you said but when I got to the list of patents the only Diablo related items were Diablo and Lord of Destruction. Am I in the wrong spot? It didn't have any information about a possible Diablo III when I looked. Could someone tell me what I might be doing wrong?
The trademarks will not say Diablo 1, Diablo 2, or Diablo 3. They all just say Diablo, all three of them. LOD says LOD, that is the only exception, because it is an expansion that branches off of the trademark of Diablo 2
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
I have forgotten your inability to show mercy for the uninformed, Cyks.
That is simply not true. He has as much information as I do, and I have ensured that he was provided with it. Nice to see you again BTW, lol.
Quote from "Warriorcat80" »
Is there ne chance that this patent could just have something to do with the diablo book that just came out... idk ne thing bou tthis patent crap jw
There is no mention of books in the newest trademark. Books were covered in one of the previous trademarks. This trademark give us a 99% chance that D3 will be released, to suspect otherwise is just pessimistic. Businesses do not muck with the US patent office for no reason, they typically have some goal orientated, and if one thinks that goal is toward toothpaste, movies, socks and underwear, there may be no hope of proving to one otherwise, because I just cannot fathom that sort of reasoning in order to create some opposing points. Besides, Blizzard has already confirmed that they would ‘revisit Diablo universe in the future.’ Work on Diablo3 has been confirmed by numerous unrelated sources. Blizzard still has job postings for Diablo-related work, which means they are still budgeting money for the development…. What more do we need, people? There remains only the question of time, not the fact in general.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Because if the invisible guy the president believes in isn't the real invisible guy then the real invisible guy gets mad and no longer powers our economy with his invisible hand. Jesus, have you never even read anything about economics?
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Update: either I am losing my mind, or this thread recieved 600+ hits overnight, cuz it was at 16xx yesterday!
I know this because I was getting ready to announce the 2000th hit, but by the time i looked today, it was at 25xx...
ok... here
http://inventors.about.com/od/trademarks/a/Trademarks.htm
Cmon guys, Diablo 3 is under the trademark I pointed out earlier.
Diablo II: Salvation will be a collection of all of the CGs found in the game, nothing more, nothing less. It is fairly old news, dating back before any one of us regitered for these forums.
I repeat, Diablo II: Salvation will not be a game.
The trademarks will not say Diablo 1, Diablo 2, or Diablo 3. They all just say Diablo, all three of them. LOD says LOD, that is the only exception, because it is an expansion that branches off of the trademark of Diablo 2
There is no mention of books in the newest trademark. Books were covered in one of the previous trademarks. This trademark give us a 99% chance that D3 will be released, to suspect otherwise is just pessimistic. Businesses do not muck with the US patent office for no reason, they typically have some goal orientated, and if one thinks that goal is toward toothpaste, movies, socks and underwear, there may be no hope of proving to one otherwise, because I just cannot fathom that sort of reasoning in order to create some opposing points. Besides, Blizzard has already confirmed that they would ‘revisit Diablo universe in the future.’ Work on Diablo3 has been confirmed by numerous unrelated sources. Blizzard still has job postings for Diablo-related work, which means they are still budgeting money for the development…. What more do we need, people? There remains only the question of time, not the fact in general.