I understand all of you! It's just that I'm afraid that they will do the same thing with Diablo as with WoW! Then why did they wait so long with WoW? Do you guys really think they purposely wanted to ship it at the 10th anniversary?
Because WoW( the initial WoW) was being made from scratch basically, maybe only extending story and all. It has WAAAY more content than Diablo franchise. And Diablo 3 was in development 4 years prior to the announcement. And it is being made with comeplety different graphics and chars and content, but nothing compared to the magnitude of the development of WoW.
I'm new to the diablo series. I was just wondering if i would be better of starting off with diablo 3? Even though I'm ganna have to wait quite some time. Or should i go buy diablo 2 to start getting a feel for the game?
Thundercats Hoooooah!
Lol, if you really want to appreciate it, yyou should try playing the previous versions for sure, especially Diablo 2
By your logic, why pay $50 for Mario Galaxy? You can just go to the Wii store and get good ol' Mario World for $5 bucks! Mario Galaxy is really no different then the nes version except for the better graphics and slightly different story right? Shoot, why play any new video game at all?? It's all just better graphics and different stories
Tons of things have changed.
I meant in a technical way, technical online experience way. What could possibly change in online play for them to assign a monthly fee?? thats what I meant.
Who says that Blizzard won't add new content and areas? Maybe they will release TWO expansion packs because of the extra revenue.
That sounds like a good idea to me. And since D3 isn't an MMO, and $15 is usually the price for playing one, I think Diablo 3 will have maybe $5 MAX for some fee.
O come on dude, what kind of content would they add to Diablo 3 that would require a monthly fee?? Expansions are another story, we pay once to buy them. The only fee that people might have to pay is for some features that will be in the new battle.net, thats it!
Paying to play in co-op mode with 3 other people is a rip off. Think of it as Diablo 2 with way better graphics, differnt classes( some), different story.. Nothing really changed in terms of playing online: Co-op mode with even less people, maybe its for the better, and chat and stuff like that.
possibly another character? the guard looks like a male version of the amazon
lol, na. I think those are just npcs that will be in caldeum, like guards of caldeum. It would be really sloppy of them to put some character up like that.
Hell no diablo isn't worth paying to play. I don't have to pay to play Halo co-op, and I didn't have to pay to play Diablo II co-op. if the online is just co-op again why the hell would anyone in their right mind pay for it? I'd lean not even buy the game as well
This dude is right. Its kinda lame to p2p for a game you bought and especially a Diablo game, which isnt like WoW where a monthly fee is needed to keep the servers going and adding content and etc. But they said Diablo 3 will be co-op with 4 players per game.. I'm not going to pay a monthly fee for that, it's not worth it.
They make so much freaking money with WoW.. I would buy it but only for single player if it is actually P2P.
Now that the D3 site has been updated with the wizard movie and details. They also have the Caldeum page up there. Is it just me or were those two guys up the top not there before? It's all animated now. i don't remember it looking like that..
lol, you're right. They werent there before... weird. Some guard looking dude with some other dude. hm..
hahaha. they were trying to tick off diablo fans alittle, in a friendly sort of way xD. I think it was their response to the complaints that it is not dark enough lawl
Because WoW( the initial WoW) was being made from scratch basically, maybe only extending story and all. It has WAAAY more content than Diablo franchise. And Diablo 3 was in development 4 years prior to the announcement. And it is being made with comeplety different graphics and chars and content, but nothing compared to the magnitude of the development of WoW.
Lol, if you really want to appreciate it, yyou should try playing the previous versions for sure, especially Diablo 2
I meant in a technical way, technical online experience way. What could possibly change in online play for them to assign a monthly fee?? thats what I meant.
O come on dude, what kind of content would they add to Diablo 3 that would require a monthly fee?? Expansions are another story, we pay once to buy them. The only fee that people might have to pay is for some features that will be in the new battle.net, thats it!
Paying to play in co-op mode with 3 other people is a rip off. Think of it as Diablo 2 with way better graphics, differnt classes( some), different story.. Nothing really changed in terms of playing online: Co-op mode with even less people, maybe its for the better, and chat and stuff like that.
lol, na. I think those are just npcs that will be in caldeum, like guards of caldeum. It would be really sloppy of them to put some character up like that.
This dude is right. Its kinda lame to p2p for a game you bought and especially a Diablo game, which isnt like WoW where a monthly fee is needed to keep the servers going and adding content and etc. But they said Diablo 3 will be co-op with 4 players per game.. I'm not going to pay a monthly fee for that, it's not worth it.
They make so much freaking money with WoW.. I would buy it but only for single player if it is actually P2P.
lol, you're right. They werent there before... weird. Some guard looking dude with some other dude. hm..
hahaha. they were trying to tick off diablo fans alittle, in a friendly sort of way xD. I think it was their response to the complaints that it is not dark enough lawl
because he was a back-stabbin goat!
lol, pusseeey. hehe jk. Yeah he was scary, but not really
Who knows, maybe they'll change it deeper into developement...