Quote from Ameko
Just toss it out here: I did the Key Warden in Act1 8 times without the key dropping once.
Inferno monster level 6
So I don't expect the drop chance of the key to be anywhere close to even 40%
Quote from Fl4sh123
I dont get their problem with the CM Wizard build. They say they needed to nerf it because of the new legendary procs. Please tell me which legendary proc is so powerful that it would be a gamechanger? None of it deals that high damage, maximus is nice, but everyone uses that on the follower, because the weapon is not that great. I dont think this reason can justify nerfing a very fun build. I played all classes, my main is not a wizard, but it would be great to see different characters in my party doing different things (i feel boring to play with 4 of the same class, even the same build). If wizards loose the CM/SC build and they probably loose the infinite archon build because on higher monster powers u cant keep archon up) than noone will farm with wizard...
http://us.battle.net...ment#magic-findQuote from UberMey
Im not getting it right, is mf affecting the affixes roll?
what should the mlvl improve on drops? I just cant see a good point on it, more mf means more rares, more rares means more time lost identifying trash as the affixes are just bad ...
Quote from lorien1973
The Realm of Chaos - Ghom and Raknoth.
This one, by far, seems like the most difficult.
Monster Power is considered "on" once you bump it up to Monster Power 1, at which point all monsters in Inferno become level 63. "No Monster Power" means that the system is technically "off," so monster levels will remain the same and you won't get any of the scaling XP/GF/MF boosts.
Quote from bmiha
So, we still don't have this sorted out - if you set the monster level to max , you can only have more MF ,meaning you use more MF gear ,MF shrine stacks after 375,400 or whatever is max MF atm, BUT you don't actually get more and better loot if monster level is set to max. Hmm ,so elites are 10 times harder to kill but don't reward better loot ? Well they do, if you have 100000000 MF + the enough kick to go through them. Interesting.
If I'm wrong ,correct me please. I'm also interested in how exactly it will work .Thanks
Quote from Benegesserit
and in return players will receive scaling bonuses to experience (for heroes levels 1-60)
This is either a typo or they changed their minds about level 60 players getting xp for ML
Quote from Benegesserit
Quote from Zeyk23
Quote from NirXY
amazing patch to be honest,
they really touched everything that I found annoying/broken.
only thing I dislike is :
"..in return they’ll receive scaling bonuses to experience (for heroes levels 1-59)".
but cannot complain really.
It does say "as well as" after that so it's a bit ambiguous. Not providing any exp incentive for Monster Power after having just added the Paragon incentive would be extremely short sighted.
Not really. Better loot is more than enough incentive (especially since loot is quickly irrelevant as you level in this game but means everything at 60). With the XP shrines, possible gear bonuses to XP, and the NV buff, I think Blizzard wants to cap how fast people can make it to 100. They really want it to take a while. Besides, better loot = improved combat efficiency which means killing faster thus faster XP anyway. Just not as dramatic as the sub-60 improvements.
Quote from NirXY
amazing patch to be honest,
they really touched everything that I found annoying/broken.
only thing I dislike is :
"..in return they’ll receive scaling bonuses to experience (for heroes levels 1-59)".
but cannot complain really.
Quote from Keiser
Quote from kilo56
When it comes to the NV stacks and skill swapping I see no problem with the way it is. If a champ pack gives you problems it isn't because of your skills it's because of your gear, plain and simple.
Wrong. Try playing a wizard against a fast jailer vortex frozen spider pack. Now try it with all skills available. Having the ability to switch to have a ton of escape abilities completely changes the game.
No longer do you have to make strategic choices in your build and create a balanced set of skills, just keep changing them until it works.
Should I remind you, PLAYERS asked for build permanence. PLAYERS were playing with the skill window open. Do you want to go back to playing with the skill window open?
0
I would rather that packs only had one or two affixes, even in Inferno, and they were way more dangerous. Design them specifically to be a difficult boss encounter, rather than throwing a bunch of abilities in the mix and hoping it works out.
0
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/8197580149?page=21#403
0
- Has the possibility of making items Bind on Equip been considered to reduce the item supply inflation in the AH?
- Are there any systems in the works to provide an alternative to selling loot on the AH, for people who truly don't want to touch it at all?
- If a legendary is created to improve an underused skill - for instance, the Three Hundredth Spear giving huge buffs to Weapon Throw and Ancient Spear - does that mean those skills will never be buffed to make them more viable for conventional builds?
2
No, it doesn't. Local means multiple players on the same system.
0
Just because a console port was bad doesn't mean the idea can't work. There's no reason Diablo can't be played with a gamepad, which is basically the only requirement.
0
Offline play is not confirmed, only local co-op(which I've never heard anyone complain about not having on the PC before).
0
Theoretically yes, but then you're counting on getting double Strength rolls on your Vit shoulders. If what you want is DPS, locking in Strength greatly increases your odds.
0
I think if nothing else, newer level 60s that haven't capped out their crit chance will probably be better served sticking with Rubies for a while.
0
I think what they have now in 1.0.7 is more than good enough for what should have been included at release. If it had been like this from the start the game would have been much better received. It sucks that it took this long, but it is what it is, no point complaining about it now.
As I said, there certainly is room left for improvement. I agree that there are too many rares of too low quality. I would like to see the droprate cut in half and the affix rolls buffed accordingly. They also should make it so that loot for your own class is far more likely to drop than loot for another class. Those are both changes that could easily be added to 1.0.8 for all we know, so I'm hopeful they'll come to that conclusion as well.
What's important to remember is that they can only do so much at a time. I feel that every change they've made thus far has been a step in the right direction. And every time one of these fixes is made, that frees up their developers to work on the next most pressing issue. From reading blue posts over the past few months I feel confident that they have recognized almost all of the things that people feel are problems with the game, it's just a matter of time before they get to addressing them.
4
I don't agree with any of that. The core game is not broken, and every patch since launch has been a considerable improvement. There are still improvements left to make, but many of them will come in future patches, and the rest I don't mind waiting for an expansion if need be.
2
The theme for the Q&A was 1.0.7.
0
I agree that it creates a theoretical maximum gold value for AH items(at least, for rares in those slots). The trouble is that it doesn't create a minimum value. If the AH economy is such that items keep getting cheaper(say, because Blizzard is combating gold inflation but not item supply inflation), then crafting will become useless again. I definitely think they need to pursue some system for making all gear eventually become account bound, either after being equipped or after being traded once.
0
2
He just has a short term memory for enchantments. Give him a break, his wife is dead.
0